7:14 PM, Sunday January 28th 2024
Thank you for redirecting me to that section! The only remaining question I have related to the back corner is if I should truly be making it a single point and potentially sacrificing one of my internal lines. In cases where there's no way that all three internal lines will realistically meet up together and form a back corner, would it be preferred to just have two lines meet and the third attached to one of those lines with the best convergence goal for all 3 sets of lines individually? Or to sacrifice(making it obviously converge too fast/diverge) that third line making up the back corner for the sake of meeting up with the corner point? I've been utilizing the first method since that seems to line up more with the goal of the exercise from my understanding. Basically prioritizing lining up all my parallel lines than worrying about the back corner? I can see an argument that doing this could be messing up the opportunity for error checking, however.
Thank you!