View Full Submission View Parent Comment
2 users agree
6:08 PM, Thursday May 14th 2020
edited at 6:11 PM, May 14th 2020

I’m... also really confused, that you’re unsatisfied with this, that is, because this is one of the better submissions I’ve come across. Let’s go through it!

Starting off, your lines are nice and confident. Really, the only issue I notice is the occasional overshooting in your ghosted lines/planes, but that’s something that’ll improve over time. Speaking of the planes, be careful that their non-diagonal center lines go through their center points (that is, the intersection of the diagonal center lines.)

Moving on to your ellipses, these are looking quite confident, too. So much so, in fact, that I’ll recommend aiming for 2 rotations from now on. The only thing you need to be a little more mindful of is the minor axis in the funnel exercises. It’s meant to cut them into two equal, symmetrical halves, and it can’t do that if they’re in any way tilted.

Finally, we arrive at the box section. Really quickly, I’ll mention that the back lines in your plotted perspective exercise need to be perpendicular to the horizon (that VP is at infinity.) If your points suggest that they’re not (perfectly normal, it just means that there’s some slight errors in their convergences), simply estimate. The rough perspective exercise improved a lot through the set, though there’s still the occasional issue. The way to fix it is, of course, to ghost more. There’s also a little trick you can use, which is the knowledge that, because of the rules of perspective, the back faces of your boxes are of a similar shape to the front faces, but smaller. That is to say, if the front face is a square, the back face cannot be a rectangle. If your points suggest that it is, they’re incorrect, so plot some new ones. Good attempt at the rotated boxes exercise, though it is a little stretched. The organic perspective exercise, too, is quite nicely done, though I’d have liked to see a few more boxes, and some more difference in their sizes.

Despite these minor issues, this is, like I said, a solid submission, and you’re more than welcome to move to the box challenge. Good luck!

Next Steps:

250 Box Challenge

This community member feels the lesson should be marked as complete, and 2 others agree. The student has earned their completion badge for this lesson and should feel confident in moving onto the next lesson.
edited at 6:11 PM, May 14th 2020
12:07 PM, Sunday May 31st 2020

Thanks so much for the critique BENJ, I really appreciate it. Sorry I couldn't get back to your feedback sooner, I was really caught up in college work. But anyway, thanks once again! I'll move on to the 250 boxes challenge. Hope to see you around :-)

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

While I have a massive library of non-instructional art books I've collected over the years, there's only a handful that are actually important to me. This is one of them - so much so that I jammed my copy into my overstuffed backpack when flying back from my parents' house just so I could have it at my apartment. My back's been sore for a week.

The reason I hold this book in such high esteem is because of how it puts the relatively new field of game art into perspective, showing how concept art really just started off as crude sketches intended to communicate ideas to storytellers, designers and 3D modelers. How all of this focus on beautiful illustrations is really secondary to the core of a concept artist's job. A real eye-opener.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.