View Full Submission View Parent Comment
0 users agree
11:11 AM, Sunday August 8th 2021

Ideally, they’d be separate pages, but it’s not an issue – we can judge them like this, too (it’s how most students submit them, anyway… TT).

Hello, and welcome to drawabox. I’ll be taking a look at your lesson 1 submission.

Starting off, your superimposed lines looks solid. They’re smooth, properly lined up at the start, and of a consistent trajectory. The ghosted lines/planes look quite good, too. I cheated, and skipped to the end, and noticed that the overshooting issue improves throughout the set – good on your for keeping on top of it.

The table of ellipse exercise looks mostly good – your ellipses are smooth, rounded, and properly drawn through. Try to lift (not flick) your pen off the page at the end of said rotations, though. Also, be a little more careful with regards to your spacing. Also also, remember that ellipses in a frame share a degree/angle. The ellipses in planes look really confident, despite these more complicated frames. Now that you’ve gotten your feet wet, see if you can fit them in in such a way that the ellipses are bisected by the center lines. Nice job on the funnels. But!, where there’s no minor axis (the edges of your funnels), there should be no ellipses, either. The goal isn’t to draw an ellipse that is roughly upright, it’s to draw one that we’ve carefully aligned to the minor axis, such that it is cut into two equal, symmetrical halves by it. Anything beyond that is an ellipse without a goal, and those are of no use to us.

The plotted perspective exercise looks clean.

The rough perspective exercise shows some good improvement over its 2 pages. I’m pleased to see that you’re spending a lot of time on the planning stage, as per the number of unused points on the page. It’s minor, but the front faces of your boxes should’ve been drawn free hand. A little tip I’ll give you: pay attention to the shapes of your planes. Since we’re dealing with 1-point perspective, we know that the near plane (the one you’ve drawn with the ruler) should be identical in shape to the far plane (the one we plot points for). If they’re not, like in the case of the rightmost box in page 2, frame 1, then there’s a mistake with our points.

The rotated boxes exercise looks great! It’s bit (though it could be even bigger!), the boxes are snug, and rotate nicely. The far planes look good, too, as do the depth lines of your boxes. What little mistakes there are will be ironed out as we progress through the box challenge, so don’t stress – all that’s left at this point are some informed decisions, that don’t necessarily align with the exercise instructions, that you’ll have to make.

Looking at it more carefully now, I’m wondering if the reason for the overshooting in the organic perspective exercise is because you didn’t point start/end points for your lines, instead extending them arbitrarily, and then meeting them from the other side. If that’s the case, know that it’s incorrect – all lines need start/end points. Outside of that, however, this looks solid; the size, and foreshortening of your boxes do a good job of conveying the illusion we’re after.

Next Steps:

Solid work, and move on to the box challenge. GL!

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
9:18 PM, Thursday August 12th 2021

Thank you for the feedback, I'll try to apply the advice in the 250 boxes challenge. :) I already read the instructions and started with a few but I'm still confused in how to distinguish which is the front face, right now I'm really just guessing. Could you give some advice?

9:33 PM, Thursday August 12th 2021

That's actually my fault - my wording in that video is unclear. Each box is made up of six faces, three of which point towards the viewer, three of which point away. You can fill any one of the three faces pointing towards the viewer with hatching. In the video I was trying to show that I was pointing at one of the back faces, but it was entirely unclear, and something i'll fix in the near future.

3:51 PM, Monday August 16th 2021

Oh, I see. Thank you ^^

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

While I have a massive library of non-instructional art books I've collected over the years, there's only a handful that are actually important to me. This is one of them - so much so that I jammed my copy into my overstuffed backpack when flying back from my parents' house just so I could have it at my apartment. My back's been sore for a week.

The reason I hold this book in such high esteem is because of how it puts the relatively new field of game art into perspective, showing how concept art really just started off as crude sketches intended to communicate ideas to storytellers, designers and 3D modelers. How all of this focus on beautiful illustrations is really secondary to the core of a concept artist's job. A real eye-opener.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.