View Full Submission View Parent Comment
3:48 PM, Thursday August 6th 2020

Looking at your last drawing, the one of the beetle, I do see a number of issues that come up:

  • You start out by drawing your major masses, which is fine, but you appear to do so with a purposely lighter stroke, as though you're trying to leave them as a sort of underdrawing, not entirely treating them as part of the "final drawing", instead trying to separate your drawing into two phases. This is similar to the point explained here back in the form intersections exercise.

  • You then go on to draw much more hesitant, even sketchier/scratchier lines with darker strokes, not approaching these the way you've been taught to execute all of your marks (using the ghosting method), but instead falling back on older habits.

  • Where your initial masses are at least drawn confidently, and so they feel more solid and three dimensional, this next pass feels more like flat shapes, due to the lack of confidence behind the marks. Where your initial submission for this lesson showed drawings which had much stronger relationships between the base forms and the forms that wrapped around them (like segmentation and such), these lack that sense of form.

  • Additionally, when building your legs, you start out properly with a sausage chain, which is good - but you then just wrap those sausages in entirely different forms that define no clear relationship with the underlying structure. Remember that we add bulk to our leg structures as shown here, wrapping forms around the sausages and clearly establishing how they relate to one another. If you just put a tube around a sausage, their relationship will be quite weak, since it's just one form floating loosely inside the other.

Overall I don't really think what you've done for these two drawings really reflects the best you're capable of. Given that you submitted the work less than 24 hours after receiving my critique, I don't really get the impression you took the time to really absorb the information in my critique, and may have been somewhat impatient when attempting to complete your revisions so you could move on more quickly.

I'd like you to do another two insect drawings, but beforehand, please take the time to not only go over what I've written here, but also take the time to let my initial critique sink in, and try and look at some of my demonstrations (including the informal demos here) to get a sense for how your approach differs from mine when drawing. Note especially how the marks I put down are always confident and purposeful - I don't try to hide anything, when I put a mark down I know it's going to be an important, contributing element in the drawing. I'm also always considering how my marks reflect the relationship between the form I'm drawing and the ones around it.

Also, I'd like you to follow a couple more restrictions:

  • Do each drawing on a separate day, so you're not inclined to rush through one to get to the next.

  • Don't include any detail or texture, focus entirely on construction alone.

Next Steps:

Two additional insect drawings.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
10:35 PM, Monday August 10th 2020
edited at 7:30 PM, Aug 11th 2020

Before drawing these two additional insect drawings i read your critique again for a few times and wrote out my mistakes and kept them in head when i drew, but i still see some of them in last drawings

Like bad proportions, skinny legs and scratchy marks when i'm trying to add line weight to the front forms so viewer can understand which form is closer

About scratchy marks: when i try to add line weight i fail a bit and try to mask it but it turns out even worse, so that's one more mistake

I understand that critique for all lessons takes a lot of your time and people like me take even more, I am ashamed of myself

https://imgur.com/a/AGjMfEj

edited at 7:30 PM, Aug 11th 2020
7:30 PM, Thursday August 13th 2020

These are looking much better. There is one issue I noticed in the second drawing however that I wanted to call out. As shown here, you started with a longer form for the thorax. Looking at the reference, it definitely wasn't the best call (the thorax was obviously much smaller, so it's important to observe your reference more closely before making those calls). It's largely a matter of taking your time, rather than jumping into decisions too quickly. Once you make a decision as part of a construction, you basically have to adhere to it, even if it strays from your reference. It's more important that your construction remain consistent, even if it means messing up the proportions of your resulting creature.

Aside from that though, the rest of the construction is quite strong and well develop,ed and I'm pleased with your use of the sausage method. I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete.

Next Steps:

Feel free to move onto lesson 5.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Art of Brom

The Art of Brom

Here we're getting into the subjective - Gerald Brom is one of my favourite artists (and a pretty fantastic novelist!). That said, if I recommended art books just for the beautiful images contained therein, my list of recommendations would be miles long.

The reason this book is close to my heart is because of its introduction, where Brom goes explains in detail just how he went from being an army brat to one of the most highly respected dark fantasy artists in the world today. I believe that one's work is flavoured by their life's experiences, and discovering the roots from which other artists hail can help give one perspective on their own beginnings, and perhaps their eventual destination as well.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.