Hi Gady! before we get into the critique, you gotta promise me that you are going to give me a longer time to recover between critiques xd!

Starting by your organic intersections, it looks like you are doing a solid job on them, you are convincigly wrapping new forms on top of each other and these forms alone look solid and 3d. Though, there is still a few things I want to draw attention to:

• First, try to always stick to the characteristics of the simple sausage- It seems like you are almost doing it but sometimes you are flattening them out a little (flattening their 3d form, you are not making any mistakes on making them look solid), think of them as balloons full of water, as they will sag and wrap around each other, but not completely loose their original structure, like a half full balloon would!

• And second, on your first page happened that you added some of your forms to the sides and sometimes it lokes as if you added them below others. As this is an exercise that mainly uses gravity as a factor, it is recommended that you just build on top of the forms you add, try to make a generous base of sausage/s and then build on top of that until you have no space left, its more useful in this way.

Moving on to your constructions, they definetely look solid and believable, Im pretty pleased to see that you are respecting your silhouettes way much than your past lesson, though there is still a thing here and there that I want to talk about so you can keep on the right path.

First thing that called my attention is the belly of your dog, we have talked about this in very depth so you know how it goes, dont alter the silhouette of your forms, instead build on top of them. And since we are on the topic of adding forms, lets talk about your head constructions- Its pretty common for students to have a hard time building these at this stage, mostly because they have a lower margen of error than other part of the body, if you make the leg slightly fatter for example, the chances are that nobody will notice, though if you construct an eye slightly higher than the other, people will immediatelly sense that something is off. This said, the general advice for constructing heads (at least in this course and this lesson) is to think the whole structure as a 3d puzzle that needs to fit snuggly together, or else it will look odd. I know that you have probably seen this puma demo though my best advice is to tell you to go back and absorb what Uncomfy explained here cause its clearer than what I will able to explain.

Some extra points on this lesson that I want to just comment about:

• Be ware of using too many contours on your masses, usually just one contours is enough since the more you add on the same form, the less impact they individually have.

• Regarding line weight, it seems like you kind of took some of what I talked about on the past critique- Just remember that it is a tool used in localized areas to clarify overlaps, although I have to really congratulate you on how you build up your cammel head, you are using a very thick line weight on the top contour of the head and that is not communicating anything for us, worse, its just undermining the effectiveness of the line weight that is actually communicating overlaps!

• I wanted to talk about what you said about proportions, it is really not the focus of this lesson, you did some really 3d and solid constructions and thats what is important here, to be honest, your proportions were pretty accurate, but its just we dont really care about that yet.

All this said, Im going to mark this lesson as completed! Keep up the good work.