I think It is possible, every line goes to its own vanishing point, so conceptually I guess it is right, though I'm not an expert, but if i put a boc on a glass table and you look from under the table It could be possible to be accurate this box
Ok, I thought about it again... and I think it's conceptually wrong..
If the 2 lateral vanishing points go downwards it means that I am looking at the box from the bottom upwards, because my horizon line (my eyes) are under the box. So if I look up, the 3rd vanishing point can't point towards the horizon but away from it.
As before, maybe I'll explain better with a drawing -> https://imgur.com/a/gpKtTlc
did I get it right?
Wow that was getting into eating my brain, but i suppouse that you're right, I had done many isometric and 3D draws for my carreer but I have never seen one like the left one and thinking about it you're right, but I feel I had seen that in a draw before, felt like a building falling over you, so I don't really know, but if I had to choose I think that yes, the left one is conceptually wrong...
That moved my ground, I'm going to ask a around, if I have news I'll comment in here
These are what I use when doing these exercises. They usually run somewhere in the middle of the price/quality range, and are often sold in sets of different line weights - remember that for the Drawabox lessons, we only really use the 0.5s, so try and find sets that sell only one size.
Alternatively, if at all possible, going to an art supply store and buying the pens in person is often better because they'll generally sell them individually and allow you to test them out before you buy (to weed out any duds).
This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.
