Lesson 5: Applying Construction to Animals

1:20 AM, Saturday September 26th 2020

Imgur: The magic of the Internet

Direct Link: https://i.imgur.com/gxDSArH.jpg

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

Gave it another attempt but, unfortunately the results are still no good. I've attempted each of these images no less than 5 times (most of them have around 10 or so attempts).

I'm still having issues with proportions and accuracy to spite measuring things. It's really difficult for me to keep things sized up properly.

I've been trying to wrap the forms around each other but sometimes it just don't see a way to do it and keep the result looking like what I want to produce. I've been watching the videos over and over again but, I feel as thought I'm not getting much out of it.

The 7th Image (wolf facing the right). ends up looking pretty bad. I'm having trouble finding the form or properly drawing the limbs and body. The 8th image isn't much better.

Let me know how where I can look to improve. I really want to find out how to do this correctly.

0 users agree
10:29 PM, Monday September 28th 2020

Starting with the organic intersects, there are a number of issues that stand out to me:

  • You're not drawing each sausage in its entirety, instead opting to draw each one only as far as it is visible. Drawing each one fully is important to grasp how they each sit in 3D space, which in turn is integral to understanding how they relate to one another in 3D space. Every single form needs to be understood in more than just being lines or shapes on a page, and these steps help us achieve that understanding.

  • You are definitely making interesting steps forward with the cast shadows, but take a look at these corrections. While I put more of a focus on a consistent light source (casting all the shadows strongly to the right), also note how the shadow shapes themselves taper to a point, whereas yours tend to end in a rather thick shape that suddenly stops towards the left side of your shadows. Using an amount of line weight on the edges of your sausage forms before actually getting into cast shadows will also help clarify how these forms overlap one another.

  • Your contour lines aren't always consistent. Sometimes they'll imply one end of the sausage is pointing away from the viewer, but you'll place a contour ellipse at that end which suggests the opposite. Here's the kind of consistency I'm talking about.

Moving onto your animal constructions, there is one drawing here that I do want to congratulate you on. This fawn has its issues, but overall it shows far more careful attention to detail than the rest, and there are significant ways in which it is moving in the right direction.

Here are some notes about your fawn. I outlined the major strengths along the bottom, and a number of areas where things could be improved. One major thing I noticed was missing (which I'm admittedly not really concerned about because it's best to really solidify the core structural elements first) is that you didn't add any additional forms to build out some of the greater complexity of the structure - like the hump along the back, or the knobby-joints of the fawn's legs. Again - not worried about that, better that you establish the basic structure first.

The other point worth mentioning is that your head construction is lacking, in that you tend to have the various components (eye socket, cheekbone, muzzle, brow ridge, etc.) floating relative to one another. What we want to see is all of these things fitting together like a 3D puzzle. You can see examples of this in this tapir head demo and in this moose head demo.

Now, I do want to focus my critique primarily on the strongest example, but it's worth mentioning that the majority of your work here really does not compare to this fawn. If we were to look at one of the weakest examples, we can take a look at this wolf. I won't dwell on it too long, but just as a general overview:

  • Muzzle is drawn as a flat shape

  • No real thought put into the shape of the eye socket (you didn't draw it as an ellipse, so that's good, but looking at any of my demonstrations will show a very different general shape to the eye sockets

  • Ribcage is way too small, should be half the length of the torso

  • While the front legs are indeed straight in the reference, it's important never to oversimplify things like this. We know that legs have joints, so you should construct them as such. Your fawn's legs were also quite straight, but you handled those correctly.

The most critical issue with this wolf, and in general, is that you struggle most of all with really observing your reference. Whenever something is oversimplified, it's because you're drawing it based on memory, not on direct observation. I'm picking on the wolf because it's the most significant culprit of this, but it comes up in various was throughout the set.

Now I understand that you drew each of these many, many times, and picked the best ones - but I have to ask, just how long did you put into each individual drawing? There is nothing wrong with every single one taking an entire sitting, spanning over an hour, two hours, and more. Whatever it takes for you to really look at your reference, analyze the forms that are present, and then take care in drawing them using the techniques we've covered before.

I do want to say that throughout this lesson you have shown a far greater adherence to the sausage method than I expected. Your trend is usually to demonstrate a better grasp of a concept, and then forget about it moving forward. While your use of the sausage method here isn't perfect, it's certainly held fairly solid to where it was before. I can even see it being used quite well in this horse, which arguably is also one of your stronger ones (not as good as the fawn, but the leg construction is really good).

When it comes to your additional masses though, you tend to still draw those as simple, flat shapes. You can read up on how you should be thinking about them here, but the key is that the silhouette is what shows us how that form wraps around the structure beneath it. Just stamping down an arbitrary flat shape won't really accomplish much, because it's just going to feel like a flat shape.

Now, here's what I want you to do. It's a big change from the usual, and we are going to go through a more significant redo of the lesson later, but first let's start small:

I want you to do one animal construction drawing, but it's going to adhere to a number of very specific restrictions:

  • You are going to take this one drawing, and you are going to separate it across at least 3 days.

  • On each sitting, you're going to spend at least 30 minutes on the drawing.

  • You're going to focus only on construction. No detail, no texture, no fur, none of that. Everything you draw is going to add a concrete form to the construction.

Based on how you've been approaching things in the past, this may be relatively normal for you, or it may seem like an extremely long period of time to spend on a single drawing. Most of this time will be spent on observing your reference, on planning out each and every single stroke you draw, on thinking about the principles covered in previous lessons about construction, and the basic mechanics of drawing forms.

As you draw this animal, you may want to refer to different demonstrations (especially those on the informal demo page - the ones towards the top are generally newer than the official demos, though I plan on overhauling all of the video content for the lessons in the coming months).

Next Steps:

For now, one drawing as described at the end of the critique.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
8:02 AM, Thursday October 8th 2020

Finished the single drawing and spent about 3 days at 30 minutes per day on this drawing. I have also split it up each day to show how fast/slow I progressed through it.

https://imgur.com/a/0UTljIg

Not exactly the most accurate one but, I tried to slow myself down as much as humanly possible. It still looks like things are 2 dimesional.

The legs don't have much meat I can see on them so I did not feel the need to add anything more Most of the fat / muscle was on the torso and stomach. I think I exaggerated the stomach a bit too much and the mass on top of the animal could just be one conjoined lump instead of 3.

The neck did have a bit of a lump but, not that much so I only added a little.

Now I understand that you drew each of these many, many times, and picked the best ones - but I have to ask, just how long did you put into each individual drawing? There is nothing wrong with every single one taking an entire sitting, spanning over an hour, two hours, and more. Whatever it takes for you to really look at your reference, analyze the forms that are present, and then take care in drawing them using the techniques we've covered before.

I'm actually having trouble putting in anything more than an hour or so per drawing unfortunately. I might not be spending enough time analyzing and observing the form.

Some drawings are abandon after only 15 minutes or so because I realize I've made a terrible mistake (something is so horribly out of proportion I may as well start over) or, I have made a number of mistakes after 40 minutes or so of drawing and decide it isn't acceptable.

7:11 PM, Thursday October 8th 2020

I am very pleased with this experiment, and even moreso that you decided to take photos at various stages of the drawing, because that ended up highlighting both specific strengths and weaknesses with greater clarity.

There are two primary issues that come into play when it comes to why you're struggling with drawing:

  • As I suspected, you don't spend enough time on your drawings. This time, you did - and the result is a HUGE improvement over everything you've submitted to date. This second-last stage, for example, is extremely well done. Construction is being applied very well here, and you've exhibited a lot of care in studying your reference and ensuring that most of the marks you put down were directly informed by the reference image.

  • When you add your additional forms, you're showing signs that you're still thinking very much about how this is a two dimensional drawing, rather than a three dimensional object. You tend to pile the additional forms on top of the antelope's back, but don't consider how they actually wrap around its structure, not just remaining on top but also wrapping around the creature's sides. I've drawn on top of your construction here to demonstrate what I mean. Pay attention to the difference between my additional masses and yours.

To that last point, you mention that you abandon some drawings after a short while because of a mistake or an issue with proportions. Don't. What is being asked of you here isn't to create a perfect replica of the reference photo. What we're doing here is an exercise, an exploration of the animal, how they're structured, how they can be broken down into simple forms, and how those forms relate to one another in space. I have had ample situations where students have submitted drawings that were proportionally hilarious, but where because the construction itself was well established, it looked like it was still real - despite being malformed. As though the student had accurately captured some abnormality.

Now, let's take one step forward. I want you to do 5 more animal drawings. Of these, I want the first three to focus on the core construction only, no additional forms at all. That basically means ending at this stage. You're handling this well, but I want to make sure that you grasp how to go about it and a single drawing isn't quite enough to establish that.

Once those first three are done, I want you to do the last two taking them as far with construction as you can, pushing the use of additional forms and all of that.

Again, take your time. That is the primary issue that has always held you back, and you've shown considerable progress here in pushing yourself to invest loads more time into observing and studying your reference, and into planning and preparing each mark.

Next Steps:

5 additional animal constructions as described at the end of my critique.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
6:24 AM, Wednesday October 28th 2020

https://imgur.com/a/I3PHepu

Sadly everything still looks flat and my attempts more often than not do not resemble the subjects I have attempted to draw. I feel as though I'm missing something major even thought I'm trying everything I know how to.

View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Ellipse Master Template

Ellipse Master Template

This recommendation is really just for those of you who've reached lesson 6 and onwards.

I haven't found the actual brand you buy to matter much, so you may want to shop around. This one is a "master" template, which will give you a broad range of ellipse degrees and sizes (this one ranges between 0.25 inches and 1.5 inches), and is a good place to start. You may end up finding that this range limits the kinds of ellipses you draw, forcing you to work within those bounds, but it may still be worth it as full sets of ellipse guides can run you quite a bit more, simply due to the sizes and degrees that need to be covered.

No matter which brand of ellipse guide you decide to pick up, make sure they have little markings for the minor axes.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.