Hi! Let me first congratulate you on finishing this challenge- it’s no easy feat!

The first thing I noticed were the improvements in regards to line quality. Though your lines were fairly solid from the get go, they’d sometimes stop short of their mark- the hatching ones, in particular, had a habit of floating inside of the plane. The line-weight, as well, was a little too scratchy. The improvements in these areas are considerable- your line-work is confident, accurate, and I can tell that you’re much more comfortable with your mistakes now. Though it’s fine the way it is, I’d recommend applying line-weight to the entire silhouette of the box, to hold it together, and perhaps in some areas more than others, to guide the viewer’s eyes.

I was also pleased to see that you’d experimented with various degrees of foreshortening, though I’d like to quickly correct a possible misunderstanding. Shallow foreshortening doesn’t mean that there’s zero convergence, just that whatever convergence there is is slight. If you take a look at the notes regarding foreshortening you’ll notice that the lines of the box on the left are still visibly converging, just not as much as its counterpart on the right. Though shallow foreshortening is, ultimately, what we’re aiming for, we mustn’t fall into the trap of constructing fully parallel boxes, especially considering how easy it is for our lines to end up diverging if we’re the slightest bit off in our estimations. I’d recommend getting comfortable with a rate of foreshortening similar to box 229.

The convergences improve considerably throughout the set. I can tell that you’ve grown a lot more comfortable in your estimations, but, even so, continue to carefully plan each mark- that’s the way. Still, I will recommend keeping the rate of foreshortening consistent, rather than having one vanishing point be really close to the box, while another is far away. I’d also recommend taking a look at this diagram. The goal, is to look at each set of parallel lines in isolation, and especially consider the angles between them as they converge to the vanishing point. Let’s take the blue lines of box 250 as an example. The middle lines, being as close as they are, have a much smaller angle between them, and as we move further and further away from the vanishing point, these lines become increasingly parallel- so much so, in fact, that we can treat them as parallel, as you have, and eliminate all guesswork from our estimations. We can use the same technique to look at the other 2 lines as well. If we were to look at their angles, we’d notice that the left one is slightly larger. This is because, being a little further away from our initial line of the Y (the one that’s pointing to the VP), it needs to converge a little more dramatically to reach it. The right one, on the other hand, is a little more shallow, and of a smaller angle. An understanding of these relationships is something that develops over time, so don’t stress about it too much, but do start thinking about it, as yet another avenue for understanding these convergences.