View Full Submission View Parent Comment
0 users agree
5:55 AM, Wednesday March 5th 2025

(That’s just how imgur works, don’t worry – we can see the full thing!) OK, I shall be formal too! :P Hello and welcome to drawabox! I’m TA Benj, and I’ll be taking a look at your Lesson 1 submission today. Phew, that’s enough of that; back to casual now.

Your superimposed lines look good. They have a ways to go, certainly, but you’re on the right track. I’d say that the number 1 thing to focus on right now is their trajectory. Sometimes when you draw a line and see it run off course, you’ll course correct. Instead, we’d prefer it if you maintained the same course (even if it’s wrong!) Confidence is more important to us than accuracy, you see. The ghosted lines show a good improvement on that front, though their counterparts in the planes are a little lacking. This needn’t be the case! If you really think about it, what you’re doing here is very much the same thing. (You might recall the little blurb about ‘units of work’?) If you allow yourself to think that this exercise is somehow different, and that its unit of work is a plane, then you’ll cause problems for yourself. However, if you think here, as in every other exercise in this course, that the unit of work is a line, and just take things one line at a time, you’ll find that there’s no reason for them to be wobbly here, if they were different in the previous exercise. After all, aren’t you doing the exact same thing? Your planes look good aside from that, of course. You’re just a little too conscious of their end points right now, and thus slow down and try to get the line just right. But that’s irrelevant to us – all we want is for it to be smooth and straight.

The ellipses in the table of ellipses exercise show a good start. I do suspect they could be a little more confident, but they’re not bad even like this. I notice that their issue tends to be in their first rotation – they tend to stabilize after that – so I’ll recommend spending a little longer on the ghosting motion. If you’re more familiar with the motion, you’ll perhaps feel more confident when you commit, and get that first rotation right. If not, as before, remind yourself that we don’t really care how accurate you are; here, we’re only judging the smoothness/roundness of your ellipses. Quite simply, if they’re smooth/round they’re correct, no matter what. If they’re stiff, or wobbly, they’re incorrect. So!, make decisions with that in mind. There’s still the occasional issue, but the ellipses in planes show good improvements on that front – it seems you figured it out yourself, after all! The funnels, too, are well done. There’s the occasionally pointy ellipse, so I wonder if you’re not perhaps switching to a lesser pivot without realizing it? The shoulder is particularly bad at tight, small motions (like the curves at the top and bottom of an ellipse) – the wrist is quite good at them, on the other hand – so if you don’t keep on top of it, you’ll find yourself switching back and forth. The solution is as simple as keeping an eye on it. If you find yourself drawing from a pivot you shouldn’t be, simply switch back. Over time, you won’t have to do it quite so often.

The plotted perspective exercise starts the box section of well. If you’re wondering about those crooked back lines, they happen due to an accumulation of small errors elsewhere in the box – nothing to worry about for the moment. Your hatching here is a little insecure, so I’ll recommend treating it as you do any other ghosted line. You don’t need to plot points for each line, but do ghost them, nonetheless. The rough perspective exercise is missing its correction lines (where you go back after you’re done, and extend the lines to the horizon, as mentioned in the exercise page). From a glance, I can tell that you’ve done well here (with the convergences anyway, we’ll talk about linework…), but so that you can see what I mean, I’d like you to add those before I ‘officially’ say it. Good job with the rotated boxes exercise! It’s missing 4 boxes (the diagonals), but what’s here is good! Your boxes are snug, and though subtle, their rotation is there. You’ve done a good job of keeping track of and respecting the neighboring edges, both up front and in the back, so everything is how it should be. The organic perspective exercise is nicely done. I suppose I’ll talk about the issue here (and not in the rough perspective exercise), but please only ever draw each line once. Even if it comes out wrong, don’t go adding more ink to a line, but simply leave it be. We know that you know that it’s wrong, so there’s no need to tell us, nor to fix it. (And anyway, adding more ink to a mistake doesn’t ‘fix’ it, anyway – it just makes it stand out that much more.) Aside from that, your work here is good. Your boxes are well constructed, and their size and foreshortening are such that they flow quite well, too.

Next Steps:

Very quickly, before I have you move on, I’d like you to add the correction lines to your rough perspective exercise. See you in a bit!

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
10:09 PM, Wednesday March 5th 2025
edited at 11:06 PM, Mar 5th 2025

I'm sorry, I thought the correction lines in the rough perspective exercise were optional, here's the updated version:

https://imgur.com/a/update-6wwwqEu

Thank you for reviewing my submissions. I apologize for not paying attention.

edited at 11:06 PM, Mar 5th 2025
7:37 AM, Thursday March 6th 2025

It's no stress, friend, it's what we teachers are her for, after all!

So, these are wrong :D I joke, they're only half wrong. The correction lines are meant to follow the lines proper, and head to the horizon, thus showing how off you were. They're not, as they're here, meant to head to the vanishing point, and show what the line would've looked like had it been correct.

Just the same, however, it's not hard to tell through that latter comparison that your actual lines are quite close to the goal, so you're in a good place here; you're free to move on.

Next Steps:

Onto the box challenge!

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something we've used ourselves, or know to be of impeccable quality. If you're interested, here is a full list.
PureRef

PureRef

This is another one of those things that aren't sold through Amazon, so I don't get a commission on it - but it's just too good to leave out. PureRef is a fantastic piece of software that is both Windows and Mac compatible. It's used for collecting reference and compiling them into a moodboard. You can move them around freely, have them automatically arranged, zoom in/out and even scale/flip/rotate images as you please. If needed, you can also add little text notes.

When starting on a project, I'll often open it up and start dragging reference images off the internet onto the board. When I'm done, I'll save out a '.pur' file, which embeds all the images. They can get pretty big, but are way more convenient than hauling around folders full of separate images.

Did I mention you can get it for free? The developer allows you to pay whatever amount you want for it. They recommend $5, but they'll allow you to take it for nothing. Really though, with software this versatile and polished, you really should throw them a few bucks if you pick it up. It's more than worth it.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.