I can't stop thinking about how side planes of a box could possibly be more visualize when we put it far from our vertical line like in one point perspective.
Like, when i draw a box, should i think about how or wher things like planes or edges of a box will be lay in a scene.
Yes, but a better way to think about it is that we're rotating these boxes freely in space - meaning, we're dealing with entirely random rotations. As discussed in Lesson 1, vanishing points only go to infinity when the set of lines they govern run perpendicularly to the viewer's angle of sight - meaning that you need a very specific, exact orientation to properly push that vanishing point to "infinity" (which is what is required to shift into 2 or 1 point perspective).
Given that we're dealing with totally arbitrary rotations, the likelihood of achieving such a specific alignment is basically nil, so it's better to always think in terms of there being 3 concrete vanishing points for each box, even if lines converge only very gradually towards some of them.
Right from when students hit the 50% rule early on in Lesson 0, they ask the same question - "What am I supposed to draw?"
It's not magic. We're made to think that when someone just whips off interesting things to draw, that they're gifted in a way that we are not. The problem isn't that we don't have ideas - it's that the ideas we have are so vague, they feel like nothing at all. In this course, we're going to look at how we can explore, pursue, and develop those fuzzy notions into something more concrete.
This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.
