Lesson 3: Applying Construction to Plants

11:12 PM, Monday November 1st 2021

Imgur: The magic of the Internet

Direct Link: https://i.imgur.com/QAfEPf6.jpg

Post with 15 views.

I'm not too sure if this is necessary or not, but here's the reference I used for my plants and leaves: https://imgur.com/a/dLqdLLY

Thanks for taking the time to look at my garbage :-) . Have a good day!

0 users agree
1:24 AM, Thursday November 4th 2021

Before I start - I know that a lot of people use self-deprecation as a pretty standard ice breaker/form of humour, but when it comes to drawing, it's very easy for people to slip into using it as a defense mechanism. While yours is far from the worst self-deprecation I've seen (calling one's work own work garbage offhand is pretty tame), it still is worth shining a bit of light on as a whole. A lot of people will take that first step of badmouthing the fruit of their labour first, so that when another calls out faults, it doesn't sting so much. One unintentional side effect of that however, is that it also can make critique less effective, because the same door whose opening makes us vulnerable, also gives us an avenue to change, and develop.

So while I know you were just being light hearted, but these kinds of habits can develop without us realizing it, and sometimes just cutting that kind of thing out can have unexpectedly positive impacts on how we view our own work and potential.

Anyway, onto your work! Starting with your arrows, these are looking great. You've drawn them with a great deal of confidence, and they really push through the world with a strong sense of fluidity. This carries over into your leaves, where you're doing a good job of capturing how they not only sit statically in the world, but also how they move through the space they occupy.

One minor thing that I noticed was that you are at times a little loose when it comes to building on top of the existing structure. I can see clear signs in a variety of places where you are definitely building up more complex edge detail one piece at a time, having it flow off the existing structure and return to it (although sometimes it's a bit sloppy and results in a slightly raised edge instead of one that flows right into the existing silhouette, as seen here).

What I'm more concerned about is the general looseness of edge detail like this and this where the relationship between the phases of construction is simply a lot weaker, since each individual spike/protrusion isn't really given enough of a chance to be grounded against the existing structure. In general, keep in mind that construction is about building up one thing through successive stages - but not having every new stage replace what was there previously. We're not redrawing the entirety of the leaf, we're simply adding the parts that change from one step to the next. So, instead of drawing those earlier phases as being fainter, and your later phases as being darker, try to draw them all with the same mark, and allow the pieces from the previous stages that can stand for themselves, do so without being replaced with a new stroke.

Continuing onto your branches, these are largely well done. You're building up simple, solid tube structures, and I'm pleased to see that you're shifting the degree of your ellipses as each branch moves and turns through space. One thing I want you to keep working on though is to ensure that you're extending each segment fully halfway to the next ellipse. You do this some of the time, but you also have plenty of cases where you only extend slightly past the previous ellipse. As explained here, the overlap we get from extending each segment fully halfway to the next ellipse helps to achieve a smoother, more seamless transition from segment to segment.

Finally, looking at your plant constructions, as a whole you're doing a pretty good job here. I'm thrilled to see that you're very fastidious in terms of being sure to draw each leaf or petal in their entirety, even when they're overlapped by others, and you're making good use of cast shadow shapes. I did catch the odd case of you zigzagging edge detail back and forth on your leaves, so be sure to keep an eye on that. Still, as a whole you're demonstrating solid use of constructional principles, and I can see that when you're taking a swing at the use of texture, you're doing quite well in using cast shadows and implicit markmaking.

So, all in all, you're progressing quite well. I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete.

Next Steps:

Move onto lesson 4.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
8:43 PM, Sunday November 14th 2021
edited at 9:14 PM, Nov 14th 2021

Sorry for the odd time to respond. I was waffling on whether I should respond or not.

I appreciate the in-depth critique, and I'll keep your words about the self-deprecation thing in mind. I hadn't even thought about that, haha

However, I just have one question / concern: when we're studying from a reference, is it fine to do a digital traceover to lay in all the basic forms of the subject before tackling it on paper with fineliners? I'm not sure if this is recommended / allowed or not. I think this was brought up by someone before, but I can't remember your answer on the topic.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to your response :).

edited at 9:14 PM, Nov 14th 2021
5:36 PM, Monday November 15th 2021

I don't really have a firm stance on that, but I would first put in every effort to figure out the construction purely by thinking through your decisions, step by step, as you build up your construction on the page. If you are particularly struggling with figuring out how to break an object into its simpler parts after a fair bit of struggling, then you may consider a digital traceover - but this shouldn't be your go-to solution right from the beginning.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Ellipse Master Template

Ellipse Master Template

This recommendation is really just for those of you who've reached lesson 6 and onwards.

I haven't found the actual brand you buy to matter much, so you may want to shop around. This one is a "master" template, which will give you a broad range of ellipse degrees and sizes (this one ranges between 0.25 inches and 1.5 inches), and is a good place to start. You may end up finding that this range limits the kinds of ellipses you draw, forcing you to work within those bounds, but it may still be worth it as full sets of ellipse guides can run you quite a bit more, simply due to the sizes and degrees that need to be covered.

No matter which brand of ellipse guide you decide to pick up, make sure they have little markings for the minor axes.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.