Lesson 4: Applying Construction to Insects and Arachnids

12:27 AM, Saturday October 10th 2020

Lesson 4 Drawabox - Album on Imgur

Direct Link: https://i.imgur.com/jslCDDY.jpg

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

Here are the references used, if this is at all useful.

https://imgur.com/a/N3A5cNk

I feel like most of these drawings were very hit or miss. Some would either come out looking decent, others would have issues with things like proportions and some areas of the drawings are hard to read because of the overlapping lines. I know we aren't here to make pretty drawings per se, but it is still something I felt/noticed.

I opted to not add detail or texture unless it was needed, such as for wings or legs and antennae.

I also focused on trying to draw where the legs would be located on the other side of the form, and to draw that out as well.

0 users agree
1:29 AM, Tuesday October 13th 2020

Starting with the organic forms with contour lines, there are three points I want to draw to your attention here:

  • Your sausages aren't consistently adhering to the characteristics of simple sausages as explained in the instructions for this exercise.

  • While you are reversing your contour lines' degrees (from being curved in one direction, then shifting to another direction), you appear to be maintaining the same degree rather than allowing them to shift over the length of the form. The degree of those contour lines convey the orientation of each circular cross-section in space, and as we move farther away from the viewer, the contour lines should get wider and wider - not maintain the same degree.

  • You appear not to fully understand what the contour lines you're drawing actually say about the given sausage form. The contour lines in pretty much all of these are set up in a very specific configuration, where the ends of the sausages are all turned away from the viewer. You do however include contour ellipses on one tip of each sausage form, which is only reserved for when the given tip is turned towards the viewer, as shown here. This shows that you need to reflect upon how these contour lines work.

Moving on to your insect constructions, there are a number of concerns that I will address one at a time:

  • First and foremost, drawing big is important. When we draw small, we limit our brain's capacity to think through spatial problems, and we also give ourselves far less room to engage our whole arm while drawing. That makes it much easier to fall back to drawing from our wrists, and will generally result in drawings that are quite a bit clumsier, and that don't properly capture the forms we're drawing as being solid, and don't establish a clear grasp of how those forms relate to one another in space. So, for example, looking at this ant you've taken up maybe 20% of the page. There is plenty of room there - take advantage of all of it.

  • Secondly, it's critical that we understand that every single mark we draw defines a new solid, 3D form in the world. These forms need to be treated as though they are real and tangible. We start with simple forms because they are the easiest to make feel 3D, and then in subsequent phases of construction we build on top of them by wrapping further forms around them, connecting forms to them, and so on. But the key to this is accepting that the form is solid and real - not just a flat shape on the page. This also means that we cannot end up in situations where we either cut across the silhouette of a form, where we just add flat shapes on to our drawing (or just one-off lines), and so on. For example if you look at the little spikes you added to this beetle's horns, you added them as simple shapes. There's no clear 3D relationship being created between those additions and the main horns. You're treating it as a 2D drawing, not something real and solid. This also relates to how you started out with smaller thorax and abdomen masses, and then engulfed them in the forms you used for their shells. While there's a little more room for this, because it doesn't define a clear relationship to the existing structure, and just ends up floating loosely around it, it doesn't yield great results. Instead, in this case you should have drawn the thorax and abdomen masses as being as big as those entire outer shell portions.

  • I noticed that you seem to have employed a lot of different strategies for capturing the legs of your insects. It's not uncommon for students to be aware of the sausage method as introduced here, but to decide that the legs they're looking at don't actually seem to look like a chain of sausages, so they use some other strategy. The key to keep in mind here is that the sausage method is not about capturing the legs precisely as they are - it is about laying in a base structure or armature that captures both the solidity and the gestural flow of a limb in equal measure, where the majority of other techniques lean too far to one side, either looking solid and stiff or gestural but flat. Once in place, we can then build on top of this base structure with more additional forms as shown here, here, this ant leg, and even here in the context of a dog's leg (because this technique is still to be used throughout the next lesson as well). Just make sure you start out with the sausages, precisely as the steps are laid out in that diagram - don't throw the technique out just because it doesn't immediately look like what you're trying to construct.

  • As a more minor point, I noticed that you filled certain areas with solid black in a number of cases. A wasp's eye, for instance, the butterfly's wing pattern, etc. Everything we're doing in these drawings basically focuses on one core idea - we're giving the viewer a lot of information to help them understand the forms of this object. With construction, we're conveying everything they need to know about what it would feel like to manipulate this object in their hands. With texture, we're conveying all of the information they need to understand how it'd feel to run their fingers over the object's various surfaces. It's all about 3D forms - and for that reason, when we add filled black shapes, they should be reserved entirely just for cast shadows - the things we use to imply the presence of textural forms. Any sort of "local colour" (like the wasp's eye being black or the darker pattern of the butterfly's wing) should be ignored. All these forms should be treated like they're the same flat white colour. This will allow us to use that tool - the filled shadow shapes - that much more effectively, without our drawings becoming unclear.

As a side note, you mentioned you struggled a great deal with the dragonfly. I had these quick drawings I did over another student's work that I thought might help. It's not a complete demonstration or anything, but a few little diagrams that could help you better grasp how to build up a dragonfly's general construction and how to think about it.

For now I think I've pointed out a number of issues, so I'll leave it to you to address them with the revisions I'll assign below.

Next Steps:

Please submit the following:

  • 2 pages of organic forms with contour curves. I want you to demonstrate that you understand what each contour curve describes about that particular cross-sectional slice of the form, and its orientation in space.

  • 4 insect constructions. Draw bigger, treat every single form you draw as being a solid, three dimensional form. Additionally, take your time - I suspect you're drawing way too quickly and trying to move through each one with far more speed than you should, and as a result, you're likely spending far more time drawing and far less time observing your reference. This in turn results in your drawings being oversimplified, and not accurately reflecting all the nuance of form and construction that is present in your reference images.

Don't forget about this explanation about how observation and memory work from lesson 2.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
2:38 AM, Tuesday October 13th 2020
edited at 2:39 AM, Oct 13th 2020

So just a quick question relating to the beetle horns in your second point, how should I go about adding a form to the beetle's horns? The actual shape of the horn is relatively straight, then turns into kind of a half circle, and I am confused on how I should approach it during construction. I'm asking not for how to solve this specific example, but how I should go about solving problems like these. Most of the forms I drew I was able to understand and try to draw them correctly but the beetle horns were confusing me a bit.

Links added for convenience

Reference - https://i.imgur.com/zbtv7fD.png

Mine - https://i.imgur.com/UbRKa7j.jpg

While writing this out I took a couple of minutes to take a look at it over again and in trying draw the horns I came up with this. I feel like its an improvement but the top right lime sausage seems to be pushing it. Is this approach an improvement, and should I approach future confusing forms like this in a similar manner, or is there something wrong with it?

https://imgur.com/a/xDCx2OO

Also, should I continue to try and draw the legs on the other side of the form, even if they are not visible? For some of my drawings I would draw the legs in full detail even if the body was blocking them, and others I would draw only the parts that would show, while using guidelines that I would still draw through the form.

I have a few more questions but I think I will be able to answer those myself the more I think about them, and I know you are really busy so I'll ask only the ones I need to.

edited at 2:39 AM, Oct 13th 2020
2:51 AM, Tuesday October 13th 2020
edited at 2:52 AM, Oct 13th 2020

I appreciate you limiting your questions to the important ones, at least right now - I still have a couple homework submissions to critique before I can get to bed tonight, and unfortunately to ensure that I don't miss any responses, the system actually forces me to respond to them before I can grab the next submission.

Here's how I would approach constructing that horn. Keep in mind this is not a specific approach (especially in terms of the additional forms I add in the third and fourth steps), and it is not the only approach, but the gist of it is there. Construction is something like a puzzle - you have pieces you can use to move towards your goal, and so you keep using them until you get to an approximation of you're aiming for.

Edit: Sorry I missed your other question. If you can see part of a form, you should draw the whole thing. That doesn't necessarily mean the whole leg, but don't draw part of a form so it gets cut off where it is not visible. If you can't see any of the leg, you don't need to draw it.

edited at 2:52 AM, Oct 13th 2020
11:49 PM, Monday October 19th 2020

My redo

https://imgur.com/a/9eIlCvv

The references

https://imgur.com/a/H3mEt56

I tried to draw a cast shadow under the rhino beetle, but I feel like I ended up making it harder to read. I also had a difficult time drawing the protrusion on the top of the thorax, that entire raised region of the shell, so I would appreciate some more insight on tackling such things.

Other mistakes I noticed were some occasionally wobbly lines ruining the flow, best visible on one of the front legs of the water strider. I feel that the bee and ladybug were far inferior compared to the rhino beetle and water strider, but I can't pinpoint what the major differences between them are.

I also tried to use up more page space, as you mentioned last time.

View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Ellipse Master Template

Ellipse Master Template

This recommendation is really just for those of you who've reached lesson 6 and onwards.

I haven't found the actual brand you buy to matter much, so you may want to shop around. This one is a "master" template, which will give you a broad range of ellipse degrees and sizes (this one ranges between 0.25 inches and 1.5 inches), and is a good place to start. You may end up finding that this range limits the kinds of ellipses you draw, forcing you to work within those bounds, but it may still be worth it as full sets of ellipse guides can run you quite a bit more, simply due to the sizes and degrees that need to be covered.

No matter which brand of ellipse guide you decide to pick up, make sure they have little markings for the minor axes.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.