Lesson 4: Applying Construction to Insects and Arachnids

4:20 PM, Tuesday November 10th 2020

Lesson 4 - Album on Imgur

Imgur: https://imgur.com/gallery/H3QVjqh

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

Hi,

first of all, sorry for the long text and the questions.

unfortunately i was 8 days sick. I tried several days to draw, but couldnt hold a pencil. After that i had lost a lot of skill. i am sorry for that.

i tried not to draw over my lines to much, but i think this is really a thing i need to be patient! it got so slowly better... when there are many lines, they tent to confuse me a lot. sometimes i mixed up a leg and and an antenna or the wrong slot for a leg (especially on wasps).

i tried to research a lot about any species.

i startet with wasps:

i tried to understand them from different sides or when they move, some of them from imagination. i hope this was not a bad idea!

scorpions:

i am really not happy with them. altough i looked pretty closely to every detail, they seam to look like lobsters. first i wanted to draw them again, but then i got sick. i think its the box for the body, the eyes and the scissors (often they are not the same size i think??) ?

when i drew the castshaddow of the animals i noticed, that sometimes i placed the feet really bad in front of the abdomen (ant and mantis)??

i did'nt worry much about texture. do i have to put more effort on that?

i drew a few pages more to figure out how the animals are build in space. sometimes i did forbidden things, like building my own construction, from imagination, or i drew the major mass only with one line, instead of drawing through. i did it only because i wanted to get a clearer vision of it in space and the many lines tent to confuse me, as i said. i have to say, that i am pretty confident with lines and circles, as i practice them every day at least an hour, sometimes more...

i hope you are not mad at me, drawing so many pages and doing beside the main pages some stuff by my own to figure things out. i ve tried to apply the methology as much as i can, that you tought us here.

i put a link underneith with some additional pages, incase it helps you to see how i thought. i dont want to make you additional work!

https://imgur.com/gallery/mCbbqjo

thanks a lot for this course

0 users agree
2:10 AM, Friday November 13th 2020

Doing additional exploration on your own to better understand the creatures you're drawing is entirely okay. I appreciate that you didn't include them with the main body of the work (as that makes it easier for me to critique, since I can focus on the drawings that were done following the requirements of the course, as exercises to help develop your spatial reasoning skills), but there is nothing wrong with you figuring out how their bodies work on your own to help your decisions. Just remember above all that the drawings you do for drawabox are not about impressing anyone, nor are they about drawing pretty things. As I already mentioned, these drawings are exercises. Exercises to help you think about how you can manipulate simple 3D forms and how you can combine them to create more complex objects.

In addition to this, deciding not to explore texture much is okay as well - it is not the focus of this course, and choosing to focus entirely on construction is entirely acceptable.

Starting with your organic forms with contour lines, you're largely doing a good job with this, but I do want you to keep pushing yourself to stick to simple sausage forms and avoid ending up with situations where one end of a sausage is larger than the other.

Continuing onto your insect constructions, as a whole you've done a great job in drawing these, and have demonstrated an overall strong grasp of how these forms relate to one another in space, and how they can be combined. There are some issues I want to draw your attention to, but as a whole you're doing very well.

The first issue is a minor one (although I have a lot to say about it) - remember that in this course, our filled black shapes are reserved only for cast shadows. There will be situations where you'll see objects that are black in colour, and you may think that because you're working in a black pen, it'd make sense to capture those - for example, these butterfly wings. Instead, I want you to focus on the idea that the entirety of your object is the same flat white colour. Ignore all patterning and local colours, and focus only on capturing the cast shadows with your filled black shapes. Because we're limited in our tools/colours, this allows us to communicate more clearly, assigning just one purpose to a particular kind of mark.

Looking at your grasshopper, you ran into a similar problem where you appeared to focus more on capturing the patterning of its surface, rather than the actual shadows cast by the little rough areas.

The last point of this nature I want to mention is that back in lesson 2, I mentioned that we will not be using any shading in our drawings in this course. So for example, what you did on this beetle should have been left out. Capturing the actual specific texture of its carapace is one thing, but what you did there was just using generic hatching to add shading as decoration. Because your constructions are already as strong as they are, the drawing doesn't need shading to help it look 3D and solid - so that hatching didn't serve any real purpose.

What we're doing in this course can be broken into two distinct sections - construction and texture - and they both focus on the same concept. With construction we're communicating to the viewer what they need to know to understand how they might manipulate this object with their hands, were it in front of them. With texture, we're communicating to the viewer what they need to know to understand what it'd feel like to run their fingers over the object's various surfaces. Both of these focus on communicating three dimensional information. Both sections have specific jobs to accomplish, and none of it has to do with making the drawing look nice.

Moving forward, there were a few places where you definitely used a lot more contour lines than you needed to. For example, on the scorpions' claws and legs. Contour lines are very effective, useful tools, but it's important to always think about what you're trying to achieve with a mark you're putting down, and whether it is actually the best choice for the job.

Contour lines suffer from 'diminishing returns' - meaning that while the first one you add may be very impactful, the second will be less son, and the third even less. So piling on a bunch of them isn't actually going to necessarily help. Instead you need to focus on which contour lines are going to be the most effective - like those that define the relationship/intersection between forms (which you've made good use of throughout your drawings).

The last thing I wanted to point out is that I noticed that you seem to have employed a lot of different strategies for capturing the legs of your insects. It's not uncommon for students to be aware of the sausage method as introduced here, but to decide that the legs they're looking at don't actually seem to look like a chain of sausages, so they use some other strategy. The key to keep in mind here is that the sausage method is not about capturing the legs precisely as they are - it is about laying in a base structure or armature that captures both the solidity and the gestural flow of a limb in equal measure, where the majority of other techniques lean too far to one side, either looking solid and stiff or gestural but flat. Once in place, we can then build on top of this base structure with more additional forms as shown here, here, this ant leg, and even here in the context of a dog's leg (because this technique is still to be used throughout the next lesson as well). Just make sure you start out with the sausages, precisely as the steps are laid out in that diagram - don't throw the technique out just because it doesn't immediately look like what you're trying to construct.

So! As a whole you are doing a great job, and you are demonstrating a very strong grasp of 3D space throughout all of these drawings. A bigger concern is that you appear to be quite heavily self-critical, which isn't a good thing. It is important not to focus only on the areas where you've failed and need to improve. Recognizing the areas of strength (and there are many here) is integral to developing in a balanced fashion. It is for that reason that we try to discourage students from including long self-analyses as part of their submissions.

Anyway, I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete. Keep up the great work.

Next Steps:

Feel free to move onto lesson 5.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
2:52 PM, Friday November 13th 2020

First: Sorry for the additional massage.

Thank you for this critique. I am really thankfully, that i can ask a real (qualified) person. Its true, i have to much perfectionism. I will cancel self analysis. Nevertheless i am really not after nice pictures. I just love to learn and to draw.

My maxim is: get comfortable being uncomfortable.

I had an „aha“ moment:

„Instead, I want you to focus on the idea that the entirety of your object is the same flat white colour.“

Infact i was asking this myself until now. Although you say it in every possible way, i got confused, because i saw often color(data) in submissions (...leads to confusion. Sorry for looking. Got it.) I tried to answer it for me like that“ Maybe only when it is mandatory to understand the texture like the tigers fur/the black stripes“. So i understand now. Its like „color“ and „bump-map“ on a 3d model...

I have a last (lesson 4) question (sorry!!):

What should i do when there are parts like the tigers stripes? Maybe like that: I will try to study the anatomy and on top the flow of the fur. Color, like black strips on a tiger (or dots on a giraffe) will i „add“?? later?

Last i have to thank you again. If i can help in the future in any way. Just tell me. Thanks again. Its great to ask a pro!!!!!

4:35 AM, Saturday November 14th 2020

So the answer to the tiger stripes is that you don't actually need to capture them at all. In the intro video to lesson 5, you'll see me drawing a tiger, where I contradict what I just said by drawing the stripes - the reason is that the video is at this point quite old, and due for a replacement. My approach to how I teach texture has changed a fair bit over the years, especially over the last two, and I've refined my approach to adhere to much stricter rules.

So, moving forward, even if the older videos might show me capturing things like a tiger's stripes (I'll be replacing them as soon as is possible, though I have quite a few older videos to work through), try to ignore any patterns and focus instead on the 3D information contained in actual textures. That is, the shadows cast by textural forms.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Sakura Pigma Microns

Sakura Pigma Microns

A lot of my students use these. The last time I used them was when I was in high school, and at the time I felt that they dried out pretty quickly, though I may have simply been mishandling them. As with all pens, make sure you're capping them when they're not in use, and try not to apply too much pressure. You really only need to be touching the page, not mashing your pen into it.

In terms of line weight, the sizes are pretty weird. 08 corresponds to 0.5mm, which is what I recommend for the drawabox lessons, whereas 05 corresponds to 0.45mm, which is pretty close and can also be used.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.