Lesson 1: Lines, Ellipses and Boxes
1:32 PM, Monday October 24th 2022
How am I doing?
Hi Chang, I'm Flippy, and I'll be doing your Lesson 1 critique today.
Let's get right into it.
Superimposed Lines
The majority of your lines look very smooth and confident.
There are some instances in the longest of your lines that you begin to arch a bit. This could be a case of you not using your whole arm, moving from your shoulder, when executing the stroke. https://drawabox.com/lesson/1/2/pivots Sometimes intentionally curving your lines in the opposite direction you are prone to curving in can help balance out the stroke.
On a few of your lines it looks like you didn't start in the exact spot of the underlying stoke, causing fraying near the beginning. (Unless, of course, you rotated the page, and so started your lines on the right side and drew to the left.) Make sure you always give yourself time to properly align your strokes to the starting line. https://d15v304a6xpq4b.cloudfront.net/lesson_images/1585f266.jpg
Your strokes are consistently hitting very close to their target. Well done.
Your lines are already looking good, and they'll only improve with time and milage.
Ghosted Lines
Your strokes very confident
You properly utilized the Ghosting method
Wobble is very minimal
Not much overshooting or undershooting present
Excellent work here!
And the same goes for the Ghosted Plains
The minor case of undershooting/overshooting will go away with time. All your lines were very well executed and very tidy.
Tables of Ellipses
Ellipses appear drawn through 2x-3x times
Some of your ellipses go outside of the borders, but this is a small issue, as the majority fit in nicely
Some of your "hyper extended" ellipses are a little messy near the furthest points, but the rest look very clean, and could be divided into two equal halves at the minor axis
Ellipses in Plains
Funnels
Your funnels fit well into the confines of the curves while maintaining even placement along the minor axis
Some of your funnel's show the shift in the degree of the ellipses better than others. I would suggest making the shift more dramatic, starting from only a sliver in the middle and working your way up to almost 90 degrees. (You already achieve this with some of your own, so just take this as a reminder.)
That's all I have to say concerning your ellipses. I think you did a great job with them.
Now, onto the boxes!
Plotted Perspective
Boxes are drawn through
Your hatching lines are nice and clean
Boxes are well-placed with little distortion
Good.
Rough Perspective
Your boxes' angles came impressively close to their intended targets
There are some instances where it appears you've redrawn lines. Please refrain from doing this, as it disincentivizes us to draw them to the best of our ability the first time if we allow ourselves to correct it after. (I still struggle with this rule myself.)
Rotated Boxes
Now, first let me say that this exercise is meant to be difficult, but you did a great job on it.
I think your angles might be a little extreme, because in Uncomfortable's demo, the larger form ends up shaped like a sphere, whereas yours is slightly more diamond-shaped, but what's more important is that you were consistent with your spacing all the way through. I can tell you were paying close attention to the relationships of the boxes, finding the parallels and using them to make educated guesses about the next box's rotation, which is the whole point of this exercise! Furthermore, you made very good use of hatching lines, keeping them clean and even, though there were a couple more surfaces that could have used them. (Don't worry about it)
And lastly, Organic Perspective
Looks good.
Good job varying the boxes' size to portray depth
The boxes' line convergences look believable
In the third panel of the first page, the box in the middle looks a little unrelated to the rest of the drawing, as does the leftmost box on the third panel of the second page, since they are not on the depth line
Good job overlapping the boxes
really nice composition — especially that last one
Kudos for using line weight on the overlaps
And I believe that brings us to the end.
I'm afraid I didn't find enough areas to correct you on. I think you did an amazing job with this first lesson, and I am confident that you are ready to move forward.
Next Steps:
As a next step...
It's time for you to move on to the 250 Box Challenge, where you will further solidify your knowledge of 3D space, as well as build upon your ability to rotate objects within that space intuitively.
A quick tip to bring with you as you tackle the Box Challenge: Posting a page of boxes every now and then on the Drawabox Discord can be an immense help in correcting any mistakes early on, before they become a habit you need to break.
I wish you luck... No, better than that: patience and determination. You've got this!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Farewell!
Thank you very much for the critique Flippy!
Rapid Viz is a book after mine own heart, and exists very much in the same spirit of the concepts that inspired Drawabox. It's all about getting your ideas down on the page, doing so quickly and clearly, so as to communicate them to others. These skills are not only critical in design, but also in the myriad of technical and STEM fields that can really benefit from having someone who can facilitate getting one person's idea across to another.
Where Drawabox focuses on developing underlying spatial thinking skills to help facilitate that kind of communication, Rapid Viz's quick and dirty approach can help students loosen up and really move past the irrelevant matters of being "perfect" or "correct", and focus instead on getting your ideas from your brain, onto the page, and into someone else's brain as efficiently as possible.
This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.