Heyo, TA qzhans here!

First, superimposed lines. While in general I like the confidence here, there seems to be an issue of fraying at both ends, especially on the second page. Remember, no matter how long it takes, slowly and precisely place your pen before making that line.

Moving onto ghosted lines, the confidence continues. The only issue I have here is the variety; try lots of different lengths to warm up your arm to various situations.

Your ghosted planes show some of the same nice work. I’m not seeing too much redrawing of lines that missed the mark either.

Moving onto your ellipse tables I like that you're keeping your ellipses tightly packed within the bounds that you've set. There's expected room for improvement in getting your ellipses to be tight and tidy, but drawing through with confidence is more important at this stage, which you are. The next step would be to ghost even more/better, and tuck that tail end in more consistently, but that improvement will happen over time.

Your ellipses in planes show an improvement in that tidiness, and I’m not seeing a lot of deformation either. The thing to improve on here would be bringing down the amount of times you have to draw through your ellipses, keeping it to 2-3 revolutions.

Next, your funnels generally do a good job of aligning to the minor axis that you've set, but there is some wobbliness sneaking back in here. This is better on the second page, but that one has the issue of the ellipses getting a bit wild and out of hand; perhaps more preparation is needed. Remember, confidence is more important than accuracy at this stage; always execute with confidence after you’ve done the necessary preparation.

No problems with plotted perspective!

For your rough perspective, the first thing I notice is how you didn’t apply the error checking method for frames 1 and 2; checking your errors with a second pen is an important part of the feedback loop that will ingrain good convergence into your muscle memory, and is absolutely crucial. You did it on 3 and 4, so I suppose it was just a bit of an oversight. I also see a few issues with keeping the verticals perpendicular to the horizon line and the horizontals parallel to it, so watch out for that. Another problem I do want to address is a little bit of degradation in your line work, with an extra line here and there, perhaps to correct some perceived mistake. Remember that all lines we put down are law, and laying down more lines to fix something will only create more contradictions and draw eyes to a mistake.

And now, the one you’ve been waiting for: rotated boxes. Before anything, I wanted to congratulate you on its completion; it's not something you're really supposed to be ready for. In general, the main issues I see here are not drawing through each box and not keeping the gaps between boxes consistent. The drawing through problem seems to only happen on the outer edges, so perhaps you didn’t really know how to solve the perspective of these boxes which is to be expected at this stage. But one thing that does help with that is keeping the gaps between each box consistent and using the lines you’ve already drawn to guide the others: Take a look at Uncomfortable's example again and you'll see what I mean. These contribute to a general problem of not enough rotation with the boxes. Keep in mind that as the boxes rotate, the vanishing points slide along the horizon line, so the two sets of parallel lines that aren't parallel to the axis of rotation will get new vanishing points. Thus, the boxes in the middle column and row at the edges should have their faces be shrunk by a lot, since they are turning away from the camera and their vanishing points are sliding very close to themselves.

Finally, onto organic perspective. In general, your boxes do a good job of shrinking and growing as they move through space. I'm pleased to see a little bit of overlapping here and there as well (although I do think you could've done a bit more). There's work to be done in getting those parallel lines to converge to their shared vanishing point, but you can iron that out with the box challenge.

On a more general note, I wanted to comment a little bit on how some of the numbers of your submission differed from the recommended minimum; namely 1 page of ghosted planes instead of 2, and 4 rough perspective frames instead of six. I get that this may be that you’re drawing on larger paper, but regardless, try and follow Uncomfortable’s examples for a good idea of the density and number of things you should be submitting.

And finally, before we close up, I'd like to say a little bit about the presentation of your submission. There’s a few photos where it’s a little hard to see what’s on the page based on the lighting, and in general I would stick to copy-paper sized paper as this is what uncomfortable bases his page standards on and it helps us get a closer look at your work. It makes it a lot easier for us to focus on your work when it's presented well, and we would all be super grateful if you fixed some of those small problems. Thanks!

Overall, this is a fairly solid submission. I am a little worried about a lack of attention to detail in the instructions here and there, which is something you may want to look out for in the future. But as long as you take care of that, I have no qualms sending you onto the 250 box challenge!

p.s. In regards to drawing more, you can pull out exercises anytime for warm-ups but try to refrain from doing a large quantity above the minimum. Let us judge if you need that!