0 users agree
8:24 PM, Wednesday June 9th 2021

Starting with your arrows, they're definitely very fluid and confidently drawn, which contributes to a strong sense of movement. What is lacking however, is a degree of planning - right now you're not compressing the gaps between the zigzagging sections to show a greater sense of depth in the scene, and that appears to be because you're allowing the arrows to just move along the page as they wish. When it comes to capturing a sense of a third dimension - something that doesn't already exist - we have to do so through intent, and plan/prepare towards the execution of that intent. That is ultimately what the first two stages of the ghosting method are for.

Continuing onto your leaves, you are achieving a bit more structured depth and are still doing a great job of capturing how the leaves both sit in space, and how they move through the space they occupy. That said, you appear not to have completed this exercise, opting instead to stop at step 2 (as per the instructions in the lesson). Step 3 - that is, building up more complex edge detail upon the existing structure is an important part of this exercise, and one you appear to have skipped.

Continuing onto the branches, you're moving in the right direction, but again appear not to have followed the instructions to the letter. As explained here, you're meant to extend each segment from one ellipse, past the second, and halfway to the third, then starting the next one at the second ellipse and continuing the pattern. This allows for a healthy overlap between the segments, creating a more seamless and smooth transition from one to the next. This is something your branches struggle to achieve, most notably when turning or bending.

Continuing onto your plant constructions, here you appear to be adhering to the principles of construction fairly well, building up from relatively simple components to create solid structures where the relationships between the forms are established. The fact that you opted to go through the steps in the construction of each individual petal in the plant on the right side of this page definitely stands out. All in all, it shows that you are certainly grasping the overall principles of the lesson, and that you're applying them fairly well.

The cactus on this page is the only one that didn't turn out particularly well, for a few reasons:

  • The intersection between the main trunk of the cactus and the flower pot is not actually drawn to sit on the surface of both forms (it exists outside of the cactus, rather than on its surface), so it fails to create a believable relationship there.

  • Similarly, there's no intersection defined between the "arms" of the cactus and the trunk, so they all read as flat shapes rather than three dimensional forms.

  • In general, I highly recommend that when constructing structures like this, you focus on the use of simple sausages to create the basic structure. From there you can wrap additional forms around the existing structure to add any more nuance to it - though all of this is somewhat outside of the scope of this lesson, and pertains more closely to lesson 4. You can, however, see an explanation of how to build upon those structures in this diagram.

All in all, I do want to see you push the leaves exercise further, and to take another swing at the branches, but as far as your plant constructions go, they're fine (aside from the cactus). So, I'll get revisions on those two exercises, then leave you to continue on. You'll find the revisions assigned below.

Next Steps:

Please submit 1 page of leaves and 1 page of branches.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
10:07 PM, Friday June 11th 2021

Thank you very much for your critique Uncomfortable, I've done the pages you requested again, available here: https://imgur.com/a/wVLCKyH

5:50 PM, Saturday June 12th 2021

Your leaves are certainly better, though I want you to put a little more effort in ensuring that the marks you add to your leaf's silhouette to add the edge detail:

  • Flow smoothly out of the existing silhouette's edge, and back into it, avoiding gaps and little "tails" that stick out. This is just a matter of taking more time and making sure that you're not drawing these from your wrist.

  • Maintain the same general line thickness as the previous phase of construction. Don't make them darker than the lines from the previous step.

For your branches though, you appear to be making the same kinds of mistakes a lot of the time:

  • Not extending some of your edge segments fully halfway to the next ellipse

  • Not starting your segments at the previous ellipse, instead starting a little further ahead.

While there are some places where you're doing it correctly, the fact that it's totally inconsistent suggests that you're not really thinking about the instructions, instead kind of winging it.

Also, I noticed that the ellipses in your branches don't really show an understanding of how their degree should be shifting narrower as we get closer to the viewer, wider as we move away, to properly represent how those cross-sections are positioned and oriented in space. If this is something you've forgotten about, I recommend you check out the lesson 1 ellipses video. It goes over the mechanics of how the degree of an ellipse conveys its orientation in space, relative to the viewer.

Anyway, I will need you to tackle that branches exercises again - take your time, apply the instructions.

Next Steps:

1 more page of branches.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
12:37 AM, Saturday July 10th 2021

Hi Uncomfortable, I've attached the new corrections, followingthe rules in the image:

https://imgur.com/a/XhJqcWX

Thanks

View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

Right from when students hit the 50% rule early on in Lesson 0, they ask the same question - "What am I supposed to draw?"

It's not magic. We're made to think that when someone just whips off interesting things to draw, that they're gifted in a way that we are not. The problem isn't that we don't have ideas - it's that the ideas we have are so vague, they feel like nothing at all. In this course, we're going to look at how we can explore, pursue, and develop those fuzzy notions into something more concrete.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.