Lesson 3: Applying Construction to Plants

8:19 PM, Wednesday October 27th 2021

Imgur: The magic of the Internet

Direct Link: https://i.imgur.com/dYZkvoQ.jpg

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

I didn't do well here as I kept slipping on drawbox practice, so the quality is inconsistent a lot of the time.

0 users agree
12:20 AM, Saturday October 30th 2021

Starting with your arrows, your initial linework is drawn with a lot of confidence and fluidity, which is helping you to better capture how each arrow moves through space. When it comes to line weight however, I think you're perhaps a little overbearing on how much you're applying, and it results in linework that is at times a little more hesitant, or a little more broken and scratchy, than we should be seeing here. There are a couple things to keep in mind in regards to this:

  • First and foremost, you'll have more luck here when reserving line weight only for the areas where there are overlapping forms that need to be clarified. So for example, you can place your line weight at the zigzagging sections, and have it blend smoothly back into the existing strokes.

  • Secondly, always employ the ghosting method when adding line weight (or executing any kind of smooth, fluid stroke), and be sure to engage your whole arm from the shoulder as well. This will help you achieve those confident strokes, as well as to have them blend a little more smoothly into the existing linework.

Moving onto your leaves exercise, these are indeed drawn confidently, but there are a lot of signs that show these have not individually been giving the time they each required to be executed to the best of your current ability. There are a few things that immediately jump out at me:

  • You've definitely leaned hard on the quantity side of things. While filling up a page is great, it should not serve as a replacement for giving each individual leaf the time to be executed to the best of your current ability.

  • The tendency to rush has led to a fair number of gaps in the silhouettes of the leaves you've been constructing, which in turn undermine their solidity and believability. When we see gaps like these and these - and even these where the silhouette was closed but the edges extended well beyond where they needed to and did not meet at a single point - we are more inclined to understand these as loose collections of lines on a flat page - not solid structures in a three dimensional space.

  • Additionally, while there are a number of these where you explored more complex leaf structures (those with many smaller leaves inside of a larger structure), the vast majority of them basically stop after step 2 of the instructions and neglect to explore any more complex edge detail as explained in step 3. That step is of course not optional - only the last step where we add texture can be skipped if the student wishes.

Continuing onto your branches, the first page of these definitely follows a similar trend (where you visibly rush through them, and also have a tendency to forget to extend each segment fully halfway to the next ellipse as explained here in the instructions), your second page (which wasn't actually included in the assignment) is far better. Here you're definitely taking more time, and while I suspect you could still stand to slow down a little more, you're doing a much better job of constructing solid, cohesive tube structures. This is actually quite interesting, since it's a more complex version of the same exercise.

Perhaps you're prone to getting bored with simpler exercises, and as such, don't give them their due consideration. That simply means that you need to push yourself harder to pay appropriate attention to those simpler exercises, and not to overlook them as they are just as if not more important as those with greater complexity.

Continuing onto your plant constructions, as a whole I'd say that you do still demonstrate a tendency to be quick and perhaps a little wasteful with your markmaking (I'm pretty confident that you're not making consistent use of the ghosting method for each and every one of your marks), but you are still approaching these correctly for the most part. You just need to slow down, to give yourself a chance to execute each mark with the precision of which I know you are capable.

At their core, the steps you're employing as you build up these complex structures are correct. You just need to be more mindful of maintaining specific relationships between those constructional steps - for example, the ellipse used here is meant to define the boundary to which each of those petals reaches, and so each flow line should specifically end right at said ellipse's perimeter, not slightly beyond it.

Constructional drawing itself is a process that involves making decisions, or answering questions, then holding to those answers throughout the entire remaining process. When we put down an ellipse in this kind of manner, we're telling ourselves that this structure will feature petals that each right up to this point, and that the ellipse represents how they'll spread out from the center. If however we go on to then disregard it, or to treat it more as a loose suggestion, we end up providing new answers to this question, and in doing so, we cause contradictions to appear in our construction. Contradictions are what will undermine the viewer's suspension of disbelief, and will remind them that they're looking at a flat, two dimensional drawing - not a solid, three dimensional object.

So, I think the best course of action here is to give you some revisions in order to be able to address the issues I've called out here. We'll focus primarily on the leaves exercise, and then a few plant constructions to bring everything together, and to allow you to demonstrate your patience and fastidiousness with each and every step.

One last thing that is worth keeping in mind, is that some students have a tendency of feeling that the amount of time they can put into a specific drawing is determined by how much time they have. So for example, one day they might have 30 minutes, and thus might rush through a drawing to get it to a finished point before getting up. The next day they might have 2 hours, so they might pace themselves and take more care with each stroke.

This approach is of course incorrect - it is not the time that you have that day which determines how long the drawing will take. The complexity of the task before you is what determines how much time it demands - and so if you simply don't have as much time in a given day, you are always free to break a single drawing across multiple sittings and multiple days, as needed.

Next Steps:

Please submit the following:

  • 1 page of leaves

  • 3 pages of plant constructions

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
3:01 PM, Saturday March 19th 2022

https://imgur.com/a/2YW7aYN

Completed revisions. It took me a while due to trying meet your critiques of my previous work. I hope this is satisfactory

6:45 PM, Monday March 21st 2022

By and large this is looking much improved. Just a few things to note as you move forwards, all of which are related to your cylindrical flower pots:

  • Be sure to construct them around a central minor axis line to help you keep the various ellipses aligned to one another

  • Do not leave them as basic cylinders - build out the entirety of the structure, using as many ellipses as are needed. So another ellipse inset within the opening, and one to establish the level of the soil so the plant's stems/trunks have something to intersect with would be a good start.

  • Remember that the farther ellipse in a cylindrical structure is going to have the wider degree, as explained in the Lesson 1 ellipses video.

I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete.

Next Steps:

Move onto lesson 4.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Sakura Pigma Microns

Sakura Pigma Microns

A lot of my students use these. The last time I used them was when I was in high school, and at the time I felt that they dried out pretty quickly, though I may have simply been mishandling them. As with all pens, make sure you're capping them when they're not in use, and try not to apply too much pressure. You really only need to be touching the page, not mashing your pen into it.

In terms of line weight, the sizes are pretty weird. 08 corresponds to 0.5mm, which is what I recommend for the drawabox lessons, whereas 05 corresponds to 0.45mm, which is pretty close and can also be used.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.