Lesson 3: Applying Construction to Plants
12:38 AM, Wednesday January 27th 2021
If you check mine I'll check yours! We can do a one for one :).
Conclusion: So all in all I think what I really should improve on are my branches. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if I'm asked to redo the branches page before moving onto lesson 4.
Self Critique: (you can ignore this if you'd like)
Arrows: look pretty decent, though at times when adding line weight I'd deviate from my original stroke. Which is preferable to a shaky when but I guess I should keep it in mind.
Leaves: Look decent as far as construction goes, but I didn't experiment much with texture besides that one leaf. After completing the lesson I'm starting to get a bit more comfortable with texture, but I have a lot to learn.
Branches: Next time, I'll vary my ellipses more to describe how the form moves through 3D space. I would also benefit from practicing thinner branches as these are too thick and rarely found in any plant.
Other; (sometimes I missed the ellipse, general line quality, and tails.)
Daisy: First attempt at plant construction. Light source is inconsistent (granted we weren't asked to think about a light source) but it does sorta mess with the illusion and feels a bit jarring. Stem is too thick but petals flow nicely. Added a bit of texture that I shouldn't have.
2nd Plant (Unknown): Branch is too thick and though they flow nicely, the leaves aren't entirely representative of the reference photo. They're a bit rounder in my study so perhaps next time I should break the silhouette more?
Agave: I'd say I went about drawing this as I did the previous two plants and it wasn't quite what I expected. The angle at which I drew mine isn't in line with my reference (though that's not really a problem) and the clusters of leaves are too sparse and shouldn't be connected to a stem but raher all emperging from a single point. Light source is also inconsistent.
4th Plant (Unknown): Broke the bad habit of using very little space per page that's a plus. Branch is still very thick however it is an improvement from the previous ones. Light source is also inconsistent.
5th Plant (Unknown): Branch is way too thick and though those flowers look alright the little blooming ones don't look entirely accurate to what is seen in my reference.
King's Oyster Mushroom: Big step up from the previous ones, learned a lot about texture and line weight. The crevices beneath the mushroom are random though and it is a bit hard to look at them.
7th Plant (Unknown Mushroom): Not sure that I should have made that area dark, the image quality was rather poor so I couldn't tell if those crevices had actual depth to them. The stem suffers from the same randomness problem as the crevices did in the previous mushroom.
Potato Plant: Perhaps I should've added more leaves? My reference seems denser however I'm not sure I was wrong to maje them more sparse. Some of the branches are way too thin or entirely covered by shadows and that makes it seems like they're not there.