Lesson 3: Applying Construction to Plants

12:38 AM, Wednesday January 27th 2021

Drawabox Lesson 3 - Album on Imgur

Imgur: https://imgur.com/gallery/OkoC2XJ?s=wa

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

If you check mine I'll check yours! We can do a one for one :).

Conclusion: So all in all I think what I really should improve on are my branches. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if I'm asked to redo the branches page before moving onto lesson 4.

Self Critique: (you can ignore this if you'd like)

Arrows: look pretty decent, though at times when adding line weight I'd deviate from my original stroke. Which is preferable to a shaky when but I guess I should keep it in mind.

Leaves: Look decent as far as construction goes, but I didn't experiment much with texture besides that one leaf. After completing the lesson I'm starting to get a bit more comfortable with texture, but I have a lot to learn.

Branches: Next time, I'll vary my ellipses more to describe how the form moves through 3D space. I would also benefit from practicing thinner branches as these are too thick and rarely found in any plant.

Other; (sometimes I missed the ellipse, general line quality, and tails.)

Daisy: First attempt at plant construction. Light source is inconsistent (granted we weren't asked to think about a light source) but it does sorta mess with the illusion and feels a bit jarring. Stem is too thick but petals flow nicely. Added a bit of texture that I shouldn't have.

2nd Plant (Unknown): Branch is too thick and though they flow nicely, the leaves aren't entirely representative of the reference photo. They're a bit rounder in my study so perhaps next time I should break the silhouette more?

Agave: I'd say I went about drawing this as I did the previous two plants and it wasn't quite what I expected. The angle at which I drew mine isn't in line with my reference (though that's not really a problem) and the clusters of leaves are too sparse and shouldn't be connected to a stem but raher all emperging from a single point. Light source is also inconsistent.

4th Plant (Unknown): Broke the bad habit of using very little space per page that's a plus. Branch is still very thick however it is an improvement from the previous ones. Light source is also inconsistent.

5th Plant (Unknown): Branch is way too thick and though those flowers look alright the little blooming ones don't look entirely accurate to what is seen in my reference.

King's Oyster Mushroom: Big step up from the previous ones, learned a lot about texture and line weight. The crevices beneath the mushroom are random though and it is a bit hard to look at them.

7th Plant (Unknown Mushroom): Not sure that I should have made that area dark, the image quality was rather poor so I couldn't tell if those crevices had actual depth to them. The stem suffers from the same randomness problem as the crevices did in the previous mushroom.

Potato Plant: Perhaps I should've added more leaves? My reference seems denser however I'm not sure I was wrong to maje them more sparse. Some of the branches are way too thin or entirely covered by shadows and that makes it seems like they're not there.

0 users agree
7:02 PM, Saturday May 29th 2021

Hi Sylx, Im gonna go over your submission.

Starting out by your organic arrows, there is a lot of mix of line quality on this exercise, see for example these two different arrows and how the main lines that show the fluidity are. The first one is moving through 3d space with a continuous flowing line, while on the second one it seems like you´ve stopped your lines at the turns and started them again. By doing this last thing, you are not only undermining all the confidence on that arrow by breaking it up on sections, you are also taking all fluidity from it, which was the main point of that exercise. Now, as I´ve said, there is a mix here, sometimes you did like the first, and sometimes like the second one. Also, seeing your line weight it seems like in some cases like you´ve added it in a really slow and woobbly manner, remember to always prioritize confidence over accuracy in all your lines- you need confident and solid lines, to create confident and solid constructions.

Moving on to your leaves, it seems like you picked up on your mistakes and did a good job making them flow throguh 3d space, while it seems like you are overall constructing on top on them, it looks like you are applying a clean up pass on top of them with thicker line weight, dont do this- Line weight is a very localized tool that we use to clarify how certain forms interact with each other in specific areas, by doing a line weight pass through all the silhouette of your constructions, you are undermining the effective use of the line weight itself. You are now drawing and working wtih 3d forms and constructions, and the silhouette is just a 2d representation of those 3d forms, if you just highlight it, you are breaking the relation between the form and the shape, which ultimately breaks the illusion we are trying to create. You will discover that the silhouette is a very dangerous part of our constructions, so dont take it lightly when drawing.

On to your branches, I can see that you are varying your ellipses, which is great, but dont be so shy about it! Try to experiment with them a little more, you will noticethat its very unusual that degrees change so slightly, specially on long branches, talking about ellipses, remember that whenever you are drawing them, just go through them twice, more than this and it will start to make everythin messy. It seems like you started with some wobbly lines and struggling with the exercise, but at the end ones you are doing a much better job!

Now, your constructions are looks pretty solid overall, though there are things that I want to call your attention on so you can keep on the right track. Also, I´ve seen that you talk a lot about doing too thick or big branches or leaves on your self critique, but remember that proportions are not the main thing here, even more than that, its probably the last thing we care- We are doing this exercises to create 3d, solid and believable structures and constructions!

  • First up, on your second plant you are saying that a better way to improve the way you represent the roundness of the plant would be to break the silhouette more, while this could be an option, a safer option for this could be to just try to change the form of the leave you are drawing on to a more rounded one. Remember that while the process is the same (first a flow line and then two lines that compose the flat but 3d form of the leave), you dont have to draw the leaves the same, you can do them more rounded, thinner or even pointier, if you compare the leaves you draw for your third and fourth construction, there is a big difference between how you draw those leaves, and you did them with the same method.

  • On your 5th plant you are going over the construction with a more thicker line, and doing like a clean up pass that we´ve talked about. I forgot to mention before that another issue of going for a more lighter tone on your first forms and trying to draw over them later is that it goes against what we are trying to work here, that is constructing additively- We start by drawing basic solid forms, and then we ramp up the complexity by introducing new solid and 3d forms that build on top of those constructions and always respect them.

  • Talking a little about texture, I like how you improved on it on your big mushroom, though be carefull with how you applied that line weight (clean up pass) and also, keep a close and careful eye on how you affect the silhouette, you did a good job there, but remember to never cut into it!

  • One last thing, whenever you are constructing anything here in this course, take the object you are working on and think of it as completely white, dont try to represent local colors with black, save that for cast shadows and texture. Talking of which, this is a demo on how to apply texture on a similar mushroom.

So, aside from all this, your work is going on the right path, remember to take all this into account and I will go ahead and mark this lesson as completed! Keep up the good work.

Next Steps:

Feel free to move on to lesson 4.

This community member feels the lesson should be marked as complete. In order for the student to receive their completion badge, this critique will need 2 agreements from other members of the community.
2:31 PM, Monday May 31st 2021

Thanks for going over my submission Weijak! I will definitely keep your points in mind during the next lessons.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

While I have a massive library of non-instructional art books I've collected over the years, there's only a handful that are actually important to me. This is one of them - so much so that I jammed my copy into my overstuffed backpack when flying back from my parents' house just so I could have it at my apartment. My back's been sore for a week.

The reason I hold this book in such high esteem is because of how it puts the relatively new field of game art into perspective, showing how concept art really just started off as crude sketches intended to communicate ideas to storytellers, designers and 3D modelers. How all of this focus on beautiful illustrations is really secondary to the core of a concept artist's job. A real eye-opener.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.