0 users agree
1:01 AM, Sunday October 4th 2020

To start, your organic intersections are looking pretty good, although I did notice that you're not maintaining a consistent light source. Some of your forms cast shadows to the left, others to the right. This generally happens when we don't actually think about light is casting those shadows, so make sure you keep that consistent in the future. Always tell yourself where the light is supposed to be, and determine the nature of your shadows from that.

Looking over your animal constructions, there are a number of areas in which I think we can retarget your focus and attention, to improve your overall results and your understanding of how to tackle these kinds of beasts. First and foremost though, I do need to stress the importance of observing your reference almost constantly, only looking away long enough to draw a specific mark before looking again.

While I definitely think you're putting effort into pushing your observational skills, especially when it comes to the major structures, it does vary from drawing to drawing, and overall when you get into a lot of the smaller elements - especially head construction, I think you end up relying more on your memory than you should. Just as a refresher, I recommend that you read through these notes on observation from Lesson 2.

Moving onto your actual drawings, let's look at this one first. Your overall approach is good, but there are a number of things to draw your attention to:

  • You're using the sausage method for some of the legs, which is good, though the actual adherence to the characteristics of simple sausages isn't the best, with some getting wider through the midsection, others with ends that are a bit flat, etc. Also, and perhaps more importantly, the contour lines at the joints are not wrapping around the form properly. They're quite shallow, and don't appear to have been drawn with enough care - perhaps you treated them more like an afterthought. We end up running into the issue described here.

  • If you can see part of a leg, you should construct the whole thing - that one leg you kind of tried to half-do obviously did not turn out well, because you didn't employ the techniques we've been learning to use. Everything you add to a construction must be a 3D form - you should not be adding anything as a 2D shape. That also applies to that front foot.

  • The additional masses along the bear's backside and upon its shoulder are a good start, but it's important that when you actually draw those form's initial silhouettes, that you're thinking about how those forms are actually meant to wrap around the underlying structure, so that it really "grips" and holds onto it. Right now it appears that you've kind of drawn flat shapes on top, and just left them there. They don't really have enough of a believable relationship with the rest of the construction. Here are some notes on how to think about those additional forms while adding them to a construction.

  • Your bear's head construction is made up of a bunch of separate pieces that are floating relative to one another. As shown in this informal demo of a tapir's head, and this demo of a moose head, the head must be treated as a 3D puzzle. That is, a series of pieces that all fit together to create the whole - not stickers we place on the surface of a large sphere with no actual relationships to one another.

Here are some notes directly on your bear pointing out the issues listed above.

Jumping further down in the set, this camel is also a good example of where the additional masses didn't work out so well, because they give the impression that if the camel were to move, those parts would all fall over. The masses need to hold onto the structure much more firmly than that. Students will often draw their additional form as an arbitrary shape, not necessarily thinking about how it's meant to exist in three dimensions until they start adding their contour lines - but unfortunately those contour lines only serve to make the form feel 3D-ish in isolation. They don't build relationships between it and the forms underneath.

That said, I think the legs on this camel are definitely showing overall improvement, and the fact that you're delving into a little more complexity by adding forms along them on top of the base sausage structure is definitely promising. This is something we can continue to push farther as shown here with a dog's leg. This sort of thing can definitely be pushed more on most of your other constructions.

Overall I think you are definitely moving in the right direction, and the shark especially does show the fact that you're able to leverage a general grasp of 3D space and how your forms exist within it to figure out something quite different from the demos provided in the lesson. That said, there is a ways to go, and I want to make sure we hammer out the points I raised above, so I'll be assigning some additional pages below.

Next Steps:

Please submit 4 more pages of animal constructions, applying what I mentioned in the critique. As you've done for most of this one, leave out any detail and focus entirely on pushing construction as far as it will go (so no fur or other textures).

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
6:35 PM, Friday October 9th 2020

Far from perfect but here we go: https://imgur.com/a/hyD6DnL

8:54 PM, Monday October 12th 2020

I do agree that they're far from perfect, but they are definitely much better. There are still some issues, such as:

  • The legs on this polar bear don't show perspective - they're all on the same flat line, rather than the legs on the opposite side being slightly higher. It's important to always think about your drawing in terms of how it relates to the ground plane, and how the feet touch it at different distances from the viewer. We also see this in your zebra.

  • As a whole, this suggests that you might not be looking at your reference as carefully as you should when it comes to determining the relationships between the various elements of your drawing. Do not rely on your memory, as it will mislead you - look at your reference almost constantly, for everything.

  • Some of your proportions are still somewhat out of whack - like the lioness' head being very large, as well as its torso being quite long.

That said, when it comes to actual construction - understanding how your forms fit into one another, making the heads feel solid and three dimensional, and so on - you're doing a great job. Investing more time into your observation of your reference will help with this a great deal. One thing you may want to leverage is a greater awareness of the "negative space shapes" - that is, the shapes created by the legs and other components, as shown here on another student's work.

A greater awareness of these shapes will help you identify more accurate relationships in your drawing that reflect your reference instead of being the result of your own logical inference.

Now, you do have plenty of room for improvement on that front, but because your constructions are looking much more solid here, I am going to mark this lesson as complete. You will of course have to work on this yourself by continuing to do your own animal studies, but I do feel that you're making considerable strides in the right direction.

Next Steps:

Move onto the 250 cylinder challenge, which is a prerequisite for lesson 6.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Let's be real here for a second: fineliners can get pricey. It varies from brand to brand, store to store, and country to country, but good fineliners like the Staedtler Pigment Liner (my personal brand favourite) can cost an arm and a leg. I remember finding them being sold individually at a Michael's for $4-$5 each. That's highway robbery right there.

Now, we're not a big company ourselves or anything, but we have been in a position to periodically import large batches of pens that we've sourced ourselves - using the wholesale route to keep costs down, and then to split the savings between getting pens to you for cheaper, and setting some aside to one day produce our own.

These pens are each hand-tested (on a little card we include in the package) to avoid sending out any duds (another problem with pens sold in stores). We also checked out a handful of different options before settling on this supplier - mainly looking for pens that were as close to the Staedtler Pigment Liner. If I'm being honest, I think these might even perform a little better, at least for our use case in this course.

We've also tested their longevity. We've found that if we're reasonably gentle with them, we can get through all of Lesson 1, and halfway through the box challenge. We actually had ScyllaStew test them while recording realtime videos of her working through the lesson work, which you can check out here, along with a variety of reviews of other brands.

Now, I will say this - we're only really in a position to make this an attractive offer for those in the continental United States (where we can offer shipping for free). We do ship internationally, but between the shipping prices and shipping times, it's probably not the best offer you can find - though this may depend. We also straight up can't ship to the UK, thanks to some fairly new restrictions they've put into place relating to their Brexit transition. I know that's a bummer - I'm Canadian myself - but hopefully one day we can expand things more meaningfully to the rest of the world.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.