View Full Submission View Parent Comment
0 users agree
6:02 PM, Saturday December 12th 2020

Along with the diagram Elodin linked, I've also got this one explaining how to approach it. The thing is though, subtractive construction isn't well suited to working with organic subject matter, and really should be treated as an available tool when working on more geometric/hard surface objects. For organics, try to work additively wherever possible, and as Elodin mentioned, our focus isn't so much on reproducing the reference perfectly. It's to construct something that ultimately feels tangible, believable, and solid.

10:06 AM, Sunday December 13th 2020

Ah okay. I've junked pages halfway through the drawing as I felt there was no way to resurrect it with accuracy, so I'll keep that in mind. Thank you!

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

Right from when students hit the 50% rule early on in Lesson 0, they ask the same question - "What am I supposed to draw?"

It's not magic. We're made to think that when someone just whips off interesting things to draw, that they're gifted in a way that we are not. The problem isn't that we don't have ideas - it's that the ideas we have are so vague, they feel like nothing at all. In this course, we're going to look at how we can explore, pursue, and develop those fuzzy notions into something more concrete.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.