Unfortunately it seems that you may not have understood what I had explained in regards to avoiding altering the silhouettes of your forms. I will try explaining this again.

Take a look at this diagram. As shown here, in red, you started by defining a ball form for the thorax. This can be perceived as a shape (an ellipse on the page) or as a form (a ball in an imaginary 3D space) depending on how you choose to perceive it.

Then you put down the mark I highlighted in blue, where you cut across the ellipse to effectively alter its shape, cutting it into two pieces - a piece above the blue line that was being cut away, and the piece below the blue line that remained. In doing so, and as demonstrated in this diagram I shared previously, you're eliminating the possibility of us understanding what's been drawn as a 3D form. By cutting the potential ball form's silhouette into two flat shapes, there's no way for us to understand it as though it exists in three dimensions. We are left with only the information we need to understand it as a flat, two dimensional shape.

Now in your response, you were pretty confident that you understood what I was saying. It's not abnormal or uncommon for language barriers to create such misunderstandings, but I did notice that while you attempted an ant for one of your revisions, you do not appear to have referred to the ant head demo I provided previously.

This issue is also not the only one present - while you have made a greater effort to define the joints between the sausage segments with a contour line, you did continue to apply the sausage method incorrectly by drawing ellipses/stretched spheres instead of sausage shapes, as noted as something to avoid on the bottom left of the sausage method diagram.

So, it is possible that you simply didn't give yourself enough time to go through my feedback in order to absorb everything that was shared. It is often necessary to read through that feedback multiple times, as it can be quite dense. Taking notes to help remind you what to pay attention to in between readthroughs can help.

Going back to the important point about ensuring that we're always operating in 3D space, you have to actively try to think of the things you're drawing as though they're solid and tangible - like you're actually introducing chunks of marble into a real 3D world, and everything you draw is adding to it. While the fact that we're drawing on a piece of paper gives us a lot of freedom to put whatever marks we want down, most of those marks are going to break the illusion that we're trying to create.

As mentioned in my last feedback, though perhaps it was not clear enough: Do not try to work subtractively. That means, do not try to cut away pieces of the forms you've drawn. Only work additively for now. I would also encourage you, as I did already, to look at the lobster and shrimp demonstrations from the informal demos page.

As to your question, there's no need to imbalance your warmups. These insect constructions are themselves yet more exercises that give us opportunities to think about how we're combining solid, three dimensional forms together.