Wouldn't it be using multiple references in the 50% rule also a study?
12:36 AM, Thursday March 31st 2022
So for some context, in lesson 0, 50% rule FAQ, one of the questions regards wether or not you should be using references during your "play" time in the 50% rule, as to which it says both yes and no.
I understand that you shouldn't use a reference only to help you avoid drawing something poorly, or that it shouldn't be used only to copy the object exactly as it is (because that would fall with the other 50% time of "studying", as it is an observation study).
I understand all of that until the part where it says that we need to use references only to "fill in the gaps", i quote
You need to make the decisions yourself, and merely use reference to fill in the gaps. For example, you may decide to draw a character astride a tiger, charging through a bazaar. Good luck finding a photo of exactly that to paint from. Instead, you’d find a picture of a tiger running, a person riding a horse, and multiple shots of market stalls, taking parts from each of them and incorporating them into your work.
I understand that using a reference should not be the entirety of our drawing (at least within the 50% "play" time), but isn't "taking parts" from each reference also a study?, I mean afterall, wether or not you create something new, you would still be copying from all those "parts".
I mean, let's use the example of the page:
- A picture of a tiger running, a person riding a horse, and multiple shots of market stalls, all of that to create " a character astride a tiger, charging through a bazaar"
I mean sure, you are creating something completely different and new, but you would still be exactly copying those references, sure you can erase or ignore the elements in the reference that you don't need, like the horse in this example, but you would still be copying the parts that you are interested in, essencially making it no different from just using a single reference because you would still be doing an observation study.
So with that in mind, how can someone "take parts" from multiple references, without making it a study? because that (to me of course) feels like the perfect excuse to stop "playing" and rather just going back to the old mentality of relying on references to avoid drawing something poorly.
I have used my 50% "play" time, only to draw from imagination, but whenever i want to draw something using references, i always wonder about this, and how could i use references without making it a study or an excuse to going back to being afraid of drawing things poorly.
Because yeah, i can be 100% sure that i don't want the reference only because im afraid of doing it poorly, but who knows, maybe deep down my subconscious will use the reference for exacly that.
TL;DR: Wouldn't it be taking "parts" from multiple references still a study or an excuse to avoid drawing something badly? afterall wether or not you draw something completely new from the use of those references, you would still essencially be copying from them, making you rely more on reference, slowly going back to the mentality of using references to avoid drawing something poorly.
Making me question how can i use references without making it a study or an excuse to go back to the old mentality?
For background, i have been drawing only with my imagination, no prior knowledge about drawing.