View Full Submission View Parent Comment
4:07 PM, Wednesday May 25th 2022

Overall I feel you're moving in the right direction overall. Your leaves exercises are well done, and your american bittersweet is solidly done as well. For the butterfly bush however, you ended up taking a wrong turn. From what I can see, you identified the great increase in complexity to what you were trying to draw, and decided that this should be approached in a different manner to simplify the problem.

Unfortunately an increase in complexity does not inherently imply that a different approach should be used. Sometimes a drawing is just more demanding, and either you need to give it as much time as it individually requires (in this case to construct each petal on each flower using the methodology shown in the instructions), or you simply need to pick a different kind of plant.

At least, that's for the purposes of what we're doing in this course, where each drawing is an exercise in spatial reasoning. The goal is not to simply produce a replica of your reference image - it's about applying the assigned procedures in order to help further develop the way in which your brain thinks through 3d space.

That's not to say that there aren't situations where you could tackle this one with a greater focus on texture - that is, treating the structure itself as though it's a simpler cylindrical structure, then focusing only on drawing the shadows that the petals would cast upon one another. I should be clear though that this isn't just a matter of putting down random marks and hoping to capture the "impression" of those petals - rather, it'd require you to think about and understand the nature of each individual petal, and how they relate to the other surfaces around them, so that you can design each individual cast shadow based on that understanding. This would actually be harder than simply tackling each petal with construction.

What you did here was more a matter of approaching it with explicit marks (so not the implicit markmaking we use for texture) but without holding to the core principle of construction, being that we start as simple as possible and build up complexity in successive stages.

Anyway, I'm not going to assign additional revisions over that, as overall I can see that you're headed in the right direction. Just consider the references you choose to work with. There's no shortcuts in this course, and so if you pick something that has a thousand tiny flowers on it, that's inevitably going to mean a ton more work for you.

You may consider this lesson complete.

Next Steps:

Move onto lesson 4.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
7:05 PM, Wednesday May 25th 2022

Thank you for your review. So my mistake was not prioritizing enough the constructional method, and for future lessons i need to prioritize applying the teachings above all else, is that correct? Because when it comese to the close up, i ended up not doing the flow lines only because i was thinking about contrast, and how about there were so many lines that started to attract too much attention

P.S. out of curiosity, in my next homework assignments, should i include the photos i used as a reference for my drawings? i see other students doing it sometime, and i wonder if i should do the same

8:15 PM, Wednesday May 25th 2022

That is correct - construction is at the heart of the exercise we're doing here, which is essentially to break down the objects we're studying into their individual parts, and then rebuilding them on the page as a sort of 3D spatial puzzle. Solving the puzzle to create something solid and believable (rather than simply reproducing the reference image perfectly) helps rewire our brain and how it perceives and understands the things we draw.

As to your other question, whether or not you include the reference images is up to you. There are some circumstances where it's helpful, but they're not super common, and if I really need them I can always ask for them to be provided.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

Right from when students hit the 50% rule early on in Lesson 0, they ask the same question - "What am I supposed to draw?"

It's not magic. We're made to think that when someone just whips off interesting things to draw, that they're gifted in a way that we are not. The problem isn't that we don't have ideas - it's that the ideas we have are so vague, they feel like nothing at all. In this course, we're going to look at how we can explore, pursue, and develop those fuzzy notions into something more concrete.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.