Lesson 3: Applying Construction to Plants

12:45 AM, Sunday September 20th 2020

Draw-A-Box Lesson 3 - Album on Imgur

Imgur: https://imgur.com/gallery/XHN3Ijz

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

I definitely hit a wall while trying to complete this assignment. In a way I forgot that this was more about the practice of contrcutions and less about how "good" all my constructions were. So, after a couple months of drawing plants I was unsatisfied with I tried to reset myself a little and just focus on the process.

I feel like I'm getting better with following the flow of leaves, yet some angles are still difficult. I feel like some of my branches are "chicken-scratchy" at times, but I went back and tried to fix them sometimes and I know I shouldn't have done that.

Overall, I feel like I'm getting the flow of plants but still need some practice.

0 users agree
9:14 PM, Monday September 21st 2020

Starting with your arrows, I'm definitely seeing a fair bit of confidence and fluidity behind this linework. It's solid and concise, but moves with a sense of motion that starts you out on the right foot. This is important, because I think this is precisely what is actually missing from a lot of the rest of this submission, and is the biggest issue at hand.

The reason I assign the arrows right before the leaves is because there's a direct link between those two exercises - they are fundamentally the same thing, just flat elements moving through 3D space, conveying a sense of movement and fluidity. The difference however is that the arrows are easier to draw with confidence because they're somewhat abstract and representative, whereas the leaves are literal - we tend to stiffen up when we draw something real, and these leaves are the first "real" thing we're drawing in this course. This can make students stiffen up and focus too much on how things simply sit statically in the world.

The key point for the leaves is that flow line we draw at the beginning - it defines how that leaf is actually moving through space that it occupies, and represents the forces of wind that push it through the world. I like to draw it with a little arrowhead of its own sometimes, to remind me that it represents motion, and needs above all else to be drawn with confidence and fluidity, in order for the construction that is built upon it to echo that same sense of motion.

Now, your linework is extremely precise, and at least in the leaves exercise you're demonstrating a very steady hand. That said, I get the impression of two things from your linework, and either one of these things might be true - or more likely, both.

  • You may be drawing too slowly

  • You may be pressing too hard

Both of these can yield a similar result, because of how the pen itself ends up interacting with the page. When we draw confidently, with a light touch, our strokes end up developing a sort of tapering on either end, where the pen is already in motion as it touches down. You can see this demonstrated here. Drawing slowly or pressing harder eliminates the opportunity for that tapering, making the linework feel stiffer and more lifeless. It's not that you aren't moving your lines in a fluid, lively way, it's just that the lines themselves contradict it.

I noticed that towards the bottom there you did apply some additional complexity to some of your leaves' edges, but I definitely would have liked for you to have dug more deeply into this, and to have experimented with more overall structural complexity as shown here and here.

Moving onto your branches, there are two mistakes you're making. First and foremost, always draw through your ellipses two full times before lifting your pen throughout this entire course, without exception. Also, apply the ghosting method when drawing them (and every other mark) to ensure you execute them with confidence, in case you aren't.

Secondly, and most importantly, you don't appear to be following the instructions for how to draw and layer the line segments correctly. As shown here, each segment is expected to extend fully halfway to the next ellipse, allowing the two segments to overlap for a good bit, making the transition from one to the next smoother and more seamless. You appear to have missed that entirely. Aside from that, you're doing a good job of keeping the width of your branch structure even, which helps contribute to its solidity, but without that overlap and seamless transition, you end up with a lot of sudden shifts in trajectory at every ellipse.

Admittedly your linewokr here is actually pretty nice and confident, going back to how you were drawing your arrows. Moving onto your plant constructions however, we once again get back to things being much more stiff and rigid. Honestly, as I scroll through all of your plant constructions, that is the only issue of any real significance, and towards the end it definitely loosens up especially on pages like this one where the leaves start to move more fluidly through the world.

I have just a couple other minor points to offer:

  • When drawing your flower pots and vases, construct them around a central minor axis line to help align them to one another. You may also want to look at the mechanics of drawing cylinders (you can read about that here - the flower pot on the right side of this page has its base drawn with a narrower degree than its top, when it should have been drawn to be wider.

  • Again for your flower pots, capture all of the complex elements along its mouth - inset an ellipse inside of the larger one to create the impression of a "rim", and place another ellipse to define the level of the soil so the plant's stem has something to connect to. This obviously is easier said than done, and I expect you've made attempts at this but did struggle with drawing larger ellipses. That will simply require more practice.

  • Filled black shapes are reserved only for cast shadows - if you see something black in your reference, don't fill that area in with black to capture its local colour. Treat everything like it's flat white/grey. This only comes up in this page, but it's not an uncommon mistake for students so I figured I'd call it out anyway.

Now, while you definitely need to revisit the branches exercise, I'm overall happy enough with the later section of your work so I will mark this as complete and leave you to do that in your own warmups.

Next Steps:

Feel free to move onto lesson 4.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
11:15 PM, Friday September 25th 2020

Thank you for this feedback. It is extremely helpful.

You have definitely identified a tension I felt as I was working through these concepts transitioning from the arrows to leaves and my 'stiffening up'. I will add the practice of drawing arrows at the end of my leaves as an additional part of my practice.

I definitely float in and out of pressing too hard and drawing too slowly. Often it is unconscious, and I won't catch myself until I've made more marks than I'd like. I think part of this may be a due to when during the day I'm choosing to practice. I will work to be more mindful of this and try to find a better time to practice.

Ellipses are currently what I would identify as the thing I find the most challenging. I believe I need to add more general ellipse practice to my warm-ups, and I will get back to drawing through them twice. I don't know why I quit doing that. As I look through all the pages of plants I drew (many that aren't included in my submission), my earlier drawings had them and it drops off as I went. I do ghost them, but I think I'm prone to just "going through the motions" of ghosting on my ellipses, and I need to slow down and be more calculated while I ghost.

I think what happened to my branches was a misunderstanding on my part. In one video I believe you were discussing how it's okay if you don't overlap to the halfway point every time, and I think I just took that comment too far, but didn't ever go back to re-reference the branch lesson like I should have to clear that up. I am definitely not happy with how most of my branches turn out, and I think this is just the advice I need to re-ground myself.

I think the cylinder practice would be a worthwhile side-quest for me right now. My pots/vases have usually felt off to me, and it makes sense that part of that is because I'm not putting enough detail into them. The cylinder practice would also get me some more work with ellipses, while helping me with the basic mechanics of pots/vases, which, as a I see it, is inherently the foundation of branches as well.

Thanks for the additional advice on filled black shapes. The one pot I filled-in felt off, and this explains why I may have been feeling that way.

I definitely want to take another go at some of these concepts before moving on to Lesson 4, so I may do another leaf and branch page as well as a couple more plant pages and some cylinders.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
PureRef

PureRef

This is another one of those things that aren't sold through Amazon, so I don't get a commission on it - but it's just too good to leave out. PureRef is a fantastic piece of software that is both Windows and Mac compatible. It's used for collecting reference and compiling them into a moodboard. You can move them around freely, have them automatically arranged, zoom in/out and even scale/flip/rotate images as you please. If needed, you can also add little text notes.

When starting on a project, I'll often open it up and start dragging reference images off the internet onto the board. When I'm done, I'll save out a '.pur' file, which embeds all the images. They can get pretty big, but are way more convenient than hauling around folders full of separate images.

Did I mention you can get it for free? The developer allows you to pay whatever amount you want for it. They recommend $5, but they'll allow you to take it for nothing. Really though, with software this versatile and polished, you really should throw them a few bucks if you pick it up. It's more than worth it.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.