View Full Submission View Parent Comment
8:44 PM, Monday October 12th 2020

I see! My mistake then, but I'm glad you followed that instruction properly here. There is definitely a wide variety of results here - which suggests that you are gradually grasping the concepts I'm explaining, but it's not always a solid understanding.

I'm going to focus most of all on this horse drawing, as it is one of the more successful ones. There are a number of things you're doing quite well here:

  • I can see you doing a much better job of wrapping all your forms around the underlying structure. Not all of them are perfect, and as a whole it can be exaggerated further (how they wrap around that is) but there's a lot of improvement here.

  • That said, there are some additional masses like the one on this front leg which ended up reading as a flat shape, rather than something that actually wraps around. So there is still lots of room for growth.

  • The head construction has come out quite flat, because the muzzle was drawn as more of a flat 2D shape rather than a boxier form. Because we're looking at it from the side view, this is definitely a problem, but it simply means that we need to accentuate the things that will make it feel 3D all the more. In your last submission, your head constructions were actually coming along fairly well, so you do know how to do this.

  • Your observation here is MUCH Stronger than before. Not perfect, and if we look at the negative shapes between the legs there's still a lot of deviation, but it was still a huge move in the right direction - especially compared to the other drawings in this set where the observation was still somewhat weak.

  • For now, I wouldn't add hatching lines to the legs on the "other" side of the body. This is a valid technique you can use to move focus to the side of the body closer to the viewer, but in this case I do not think it is doing us any favours here - we want to focus entirely on construction for now, additional matters of presentation can be left for later.

  • The tail is something you generally struggle with quite a bit, and it's because you end up drawing it as something that doesn't really convey any sense of flow or fluidity - the tail is more akin to the leaves from lesson 3, where they're not heavy/sturdy things, it's more a representation of motion. The complex shape you constructed there may somewhat capture the general shape of what we see, but it doesn't convey the movement that the photograph gives us - so instead of trying to precisely capture its complexity as a two dimensional shape, focus instead on applying the principles of leaves from lesson 3, starting by defining a "flow line", and then creating your shape with simpler edges. Don't worry about capturing the tail accurately as shown here. Focus instead on what the photograph is showing you, and conveying that to the viewer.

If all of your drawings in this set were at the same level as the horse, I'd definitely mark it as complete - but since they're not, I'd like you to do another 4 animal constructions, focusing on how you approached the horse - specifically observing your reference more.

Next Steps:

Please submit 4 more animal constructions.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
3:33 PM, Monday November 23rd 2020
6:01 PM, Monday November 23rd 2020

This is certainly a bit of a mixed bag. Your first drawing - the horse - is a huge improvement over before. It's not perfect, and there are a few areas in which I will make recommendations for further improvement, but as a whole it's definitely pushing forward in a notable fashion.

Your other three drawings, however, definitely come off as much weaker, although it's more at the first glance than anything else. This is because they have some really glaring issues that stand out, which make it harder to notice the fact that the underlying construction isn't actually all that bad. The main issues are related to how you've approached drawing their heads. It seems to me that your observational skills (or perhaps just your attention and care) drop off sharply when you start drawing their heads. The horse's head was pretty decent - a bit long, but it showed that you were paying attention and making decisions based on what was present in your reference image.

The wolf and otter heads however were largely made up, not reflecting your reference at all. The body construction is however much better, for the most part. There is that biiiig form you half-drew coming down from your wolf's head all the way down along its belly that was very incorrect, for a couple reasons:

  • First off, it wasn't drawn as a complete, enclosed form. It was drawn more as a line that relies on other forms' outlines to enclose its own silhouette. Every single form we add to a construction must be its own fully enclosed form.

  • Secondly, any situation where you end up with such a massive additional form, you need to think about just what it is meant to accomplish. Generally speaking, a form that big is probably trying to accomplish too many things at once, and so you're probably skipping steps. It's usually best to construct them using several smaller masses building upon one another, each accomplishing a much smaller overall task.

Since I last gave you feedback, I've drawn up some additional diagrams that may help you better grasp how to approach two topics you're struggling with: head construction and thinking about additional masses. That said, you have improved with the latter.

For head construction, here's a breakdown and explanation of how to tackle building a head. This is something I plan on integrating more meaningfully into the lesson content in the coming months, as I work on rerecording the video demos. Read through the explanation, and I recommend attempting to draw along with the demonstration to better grasp how to approach building up that kind of structure. Since you have a tendency to draw your eye sockets way too small, make a point of drawing them larger than you think they need to be. This will also help you avoid cramping up the head construction as a whole.

Moving onto the next issue, as shown in this diagram, the silhouette of our additional masses is all determined by thinking about what structure it is being pushed up against. When the mass is floating up in space, it's like a ball or blob of soft meat. It's malleable, but because there's nothing else pressing against it, it curves outward all over, forming a ball. If however we were to push it down onto another form (like the depicted box), the form is going to start curving around that form, adding more complexity along the sides that actually make contact. This forms corners, and inwards curvature.

What this means at its core is that anywhere you include any complexity along the silhouette of an additional mass, you need to be aware of what specific form or structure is actually causing it. You need to be consciously aware of a lot of the little masses you're building up on the body of your animal.

Now, to be clear, you are improving on this front, especially when it comes to the animals' torsos. The biggest room for improvement is in how you tackle the animals' legs - the additional masses you add there tend to have silhouettes that don't read as clearly as wrapping around these structures. Try not to just focus on the forms that bulge out on the sides of the leg - draw the forms they're going to press up against along the inside of the leg as well, as shown in this old dog leg example.

All in all, you are really making progress, but these last little bits - understanding how the additional forms press up against the existing structure, and understanding how to approach the head structure - are very important. So I want to see 2 more animal drawings, and the draw-along with the head structure demo.

Next Steps:

Please submit two more animal drawings and the drawing of the head structure demo. Regardless of your results in these revisions, I will be marking this lesson as complete.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
11:19 PM, Tuesday November 24th 2020

I was looking at my feedback and realized that I'd done a redline of two of your drawings but totally forgot to actually included it in my critique. Here it is. Sorry about that!

8:19 AM, Monday November 30th 2020
View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

The Science of Deciding What You Should Draw

Right from when students hit the 50% rule early on in Lesson 0, they ask the same question - "What am I supposed to draw?"

It's not magic. We're made to think that when someone just whips off interesting things to draw, that they're gifted in a way that we are not. The problem isn't that we don't have ideas - it's that the ideas we have are so vague, they feel like nothing at all. In this course, we're going to look at how we can explore, pursue, and develop those fuzzy notions into something more concrete.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.