View Full Submission View Parent Comment
6:54 PM, Monday May 16th 2022

So there are definitely things you're doing here that are coming along well, as well as areas where you're getting distracted by detail. I can definitely see that detail is something that you're trying to figure out, in a sense, in that you're tackling it through a couple of different approaches.

Here especially the leaves on the top of the page, you're jumping head-first into the "decoration" I talked about in my previous feedback. That is to say, you don't have a clear goal to work towards here in the addition of each mark, you're just kind of floundering, trying to reproduce what you see in your reference image, but with severely limited tools (working strictly with black and white).

My feedback on this front previously hinged on the fact that in this course, we deal with two things: construction and texture, and texture specifically pertains to the points raised in Lesson 2, which is all about understanding the specific nature of each individual textural form you're adding to your construction's surfaces. That's not what you're doing here - you're not thinking about the forms that are present, you're thinking in terms of each individual stroke, and thinking in terms of reproducing what you see in your reference image. That is taking 2D information (your reference image) and applying it to a 2D drawing, but without the necessary intermediary step of understanding the forms that are present, and how they relate to the surfaces around them in 3D space.

I elaborate on this further in these notes, so I suggest you give them a read.

Skipping further down to this drawing, you do think more specifically about each individual textural form that is present, although you're drawing each and every one with an outline, using explicit markmaking techniques, rather than the implicit ones discussed back in Lesson 2. Implicit markmaking is not about drawing the forms themselves, but rather the specific shadow shapes they cast - shapes which themselves are designed based on the relationship between the form casting the shadow, and the surface receiving it.

One thing that helps with this is to purposely approach it in two stages - first outlining your intended shadow shape (the process of which helps us think about how we're designing the shape, and about the forms/surfaces in question), then filling it in. You can see an example of this in this video (which is timestamped to the brush pen section, in which this approach is demonstrated).

This is of course not easy to do, but you're sidestepping it entirely by instead relying on explicit markmaking - outlining each textural form, rather than attempting to deal with shadows at all.

I should mention that what you're doing on the leaf veins here is actually very much headed in the right direction - you just need to stop working with individual lines, and start working with actual shadow shapes.

Now, when you stop worrying about texture/detail (which is optional for the purposes of this course, so you don't have to worry about it), you definitely do better. Specifically this drawing. Here there are two main issues, but overall it's still fairly successful:

  • A minor point, but it would have been good to draw through the planter box - that is, draw the edges on the opposite side as though we have x-ray vision. This will help us to understand how it's meant to exist in relation to the other forms at play, not in the 2D space of the drawing, but in the three dimensions of the construction.

  • As shown here you are prone to skipping constructional steps, and diving into a more complex initial silhouette than you should be. Remember - construction is all about maintaining tight, specific relationships between the stages of construction, and when there's no preceding structure to support what you're trying to draw, you must keep things as simple as possible.

As to that second point, you're much more prone to leaving looser relationships between your constructional steps in this drawing, at least in some places. As shown here, you should not have a bit of edge detail that attempts to capture more than one thing at a time. Always have it rise off the previous stage of construction's edge, then return to it. Don't go in for seconds and thirds.

Oh, one last thing - in general, you are not putting enough time into your linework, and it results in a lot of sloppiness. For example, if we look at this individual leaf, it shows clear signs that you're trying to get through it quickly, rather than giving yourself a decent measure of time to think through each individual problem. Don't stress about speed - your only responsibility here is to give each and every form, every shape, and every mark the time it requires for you to execute it to the best of your current ability, with appropriate consideration for what each mark's job is meant to be, and how it can accomplish that task most effectively. These are at the heart of the ghosting method, specifically in its planning phase - so do not skip or rush through it.

I'm going to assign one last set of revisions just to see what you make of this feedback.

Next Steps:

Please submit:

  • 1 page of leaves

  • 2 pages of plant constructions

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
5:50 PM, Saturday June 4th 2022

https://imgur.com/a/qzShEKM

I think I started understanding better this time around. Hopefully it shows here, if not then I'm okay with trying again

7:26 PM, Monday June 6th 2022

I'll be marking this lesson as complete, as you're demonstrating enough here that you understand how to approach the core principles of construction, although there are quite a few points that you are still struggling to implement:

  • The first thing that jumped out at me was how you were dealing with texture. We'd discussed this previously, but you're still running into a fair bit of trouble with it. Most of the time you still appear to be looking for reasons to be able to add a ton more ink down, rather than trying to imply the presence of specific forms with as little ink as possible. This is something I talked about in my original critique when discussing the difference between decoration vs texture. Also, you may want to read through these notes as well.

  • In my original feedback I stressed the importance of constructing your flower pots around central minor axis lines. You've been doing so this time around, albeit in a somewhat rushed fashion. Take more care in executing a single, straight, smooth, confident stroke using the ghosting method, and ensure that the minor axis line cuts entirely through the areas where you intend to place your ellipses, rather than just going from center to center.

  • I also mentioned that you should also include ellipses inset within the opening, to help establish the thickness of the rim. You appear to have skipped this.

  • In some places, like here, you're still prone to zigzagging your edge detail back and forth, which as explained here should be avoided.

Setting texture aside (where you're definitely still running into difficulties in terms of understanding what the goal is for those marks), when it comes to core construction I can see that you very much have it in you to knock this work out of the park. What's keeping you from doing so is the tendency to rush.

You may not think you're rushing, but I can see it quite clearly in your work that the more demanding a drawing gets, the less time you put into each individual mark - into identifying what its purpose is meant to be, into observing the specific element you're trying to transfer from your reference into your drawing, into executing each and every stroke with planning and preparation, preceding a confident execution (as per the ghosting method).

You also have a tendency to specifically lean into doing constructions that are more complex, with a lot of different elements to them. There's nothing wrong with picking a simple plant - in fact, it can provide a far better opportunity to force yourself to take your time with each individual mark, whereas picking more complex ones may make you feel like you're giving them ample time, but with each individual mark still being given less attention.

Now, as I said - I am marking this lesson as complete. As it stands, I think you've received the feedback you need, you simply need to give yourself the time to absorb and apply it all. Rather than investing more time into critiquing further rounds of revisions, I'm going to give you the chance to reevaluate how you allocate your time, and will allow you to push forward into the next lesson.

Next Steps:

Move onto lesson 4.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Pentel Pocket Brush Pen

Pentel Pocket Brush Pen

This is a remarkable little pen. Technically speaking, any brush pen of reasonable quality will do, but I'm especially fond of this one. It's incredibly difficult to draw with (especially at first) due to how much your stroke varies based on how much pressure you apply, and how you use it - but at the same time despite this frustration, it's also incredibly fun.

Moreover, due to the challenge of its use, it teaches you a lot about the nuances of one's stroke. These are the kinds of skills that one can carry over to standard felt tip pens, as well as to digital media. Really great for doodling and just enjoying yourself.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.