250 Box Challenge
11:41 PM, Thursday September 24th 2020
Hello! I was told in my last official critique that I could submit 150 boxes instead of 250 as I completed the 250 box challenge in the past. I hope thats ok!
Just to let you know that you linked the wrong lesson, so I am going to mark you as "needs revisions" and you can just comment here with the correct link and I will give you your critique.
Next Steps:
Please link me to the correct album so that I can critique your 250 Box Challenge.
Oh whoops! Thanks for letting me know :) . Here's the proper link: https://imgur.com/gallery/JZKiRK9
Thank you for getting me the right link!
Overall you did great! Your lines are straight and confident looking. You also do a pretty good job of getting your sets of parallel lines to converge more consistently towards their shared vanishing point.
For the future, I recommend that you start trying to add some extra line weight to your boxes, as shown here. This will help further reinforce the illusion of solidity in your boxes/forms.
You said you had done the challenge before, so maybe you have seen this before. But before I send you off I want to show you this diagram just in case as it can help a lot with thinking through your convergences. So, when you are looking at your sets of lines you want to be focusing only on the lines that share a vanishing point. This does not include lines that share a corner or a plane, only lines that converge towards the same vanishing point. Now when you think of those lines, including those that have not been drawn, you can think about the angles from which they leave the vanishing point. Usually the middle lines have a small angle between them, and this angle will become negligible by the time they reach the box.
Congratulations on completing the box challenge (again) and good luck with lesson 2!
Next Steps:
Continue to lesson 2!
Thank you very much for your feedback! ^-^
Michael Hampton is one of my favourite figure drawing teachers, specifically because of how he approaches things from a basis of structure, which as you have probably noted from Drawabox, is a big priority for me. Gesture however is the opposite of structure however - they both exist at opposite ends of a spectrum, where structure promotes solidity and structure (and can on its own result in stiffness and rigidity), gesture focuses on motion and fluidity, which can result in things that are ephemeral, not quite feeling solid and stable.
With structure and spatial reasoning in his very bones, he still provides an excellent exploration of gesture, but in a visual language in something that we here appreciate greatly, and that's not something you can find everywhere.
We use cookies in conjunction with Google Analytics to anonymously track how our website is used.
This data is not shared with any other parties or sold to anyone. They are also disabled until consent is provided by clicking the button below, and this consent can be revoked at any time by clicking the "Revoke Analytics Cookie Consent" link in our website footer.
You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.