View Full Submission View Parent Comment
2 users agree
11:46 AM, Saturday March 1st 2025

Hello Liia, Congratulations on finishing lesson 3. I'll be giving you feedback, pointing out mistakes you've made as well as thing you did good.

Arrows

  • You make good use of foreshortening. The arrows get narrower and the bends are closer to each other towards the back giving a good sense of depth.

  • You also applied shadows and line thickness correctly to clearly establish how your arrows twist and turn in space. The hatched lines of your shadows are slightly bent however. Try to make them straight by using the ghosting method.

Leaves

  • The linework for your leaves is looking smooth which helps communicate their shape and movement in space.

  • Your addition of edge detail is generally looking good, as you construct your edge detail additively.

  • It's good to see you experimenting with more complex leave shapes of different types of plant.

Branches

  • Moving on to your branches they are coming along decently as you're following the instructions for the exercise. There are a couple of visible[ tails ]https://drawabox.com/lesson/3/2/tails)in these branches. This mostly comes down to practice but you can also attempt to mitigate it by limiting the amount of ellipses in the branches. By spacing them further apart you'll allow for a bigger runway between ellipses and ensure a smoother transition between marks.

  • For ellipses it's good to see that you're always drawing through them twice. However the degree of the ellipses is very similar. They do get wider/narrower along the branches but you can push this a lot further to create more dynamic structures. Remember that as a form shifts in relation to the viewer, so will the degree of the ellipses within that structure also shift.

Plant construction

  • The plant construction is coming along nicely. You use the method as described which results in believable 3d shapes.

  • While it's not a requirement I would suggest to spend some time on texture. Most importantly lineweight (which you did on some occasions but not on all) and cast shadows as those really help with the readability of your drawings. And especially in later lessons where there are a lot of construction lines it helps differentiate which lines are important and which are not.

  • I also see you've drawn mostly branches which again is fine as it fulfills the requirement of the lesson it's good to push yourself to drawing more different types of plants. For example when drawing a whole plant (like the potato plant demo) you face a different problems to solve. Namely to space out the different branches so they all fit together.

In short, technically your drawings are very good. You seem to have a good understanding of how you draw your lines and how construction works. As a point of improvement I suggest to pick more varied subjects to draw.

Next Steps:

  • Continue to lesson 4
This community member feels the lesson should be marked as complete, and 2 others agree. The student has earned their completion badge for this lesson and should feel confident in moving onto the next lesson.
5:20 PM, Saturday March 1st 2025

Thank you so much for critiqueing my work Fable!! Your critique was very thorough and your suggestments for improvement are very helpful! I look forward to implementing them :D Thank you again!

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something we've used ourselves, or know to be of impeccable quality. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Michael Hampton's Gesture Course

Michael Hampton's Gesture Course

Michael Hampton is one of my favourite figure drawing teachers, specifically because of how he approaches things from a basis of structure, which as you have probably noted from Drawabox, is a big priority for me. Gesture however is the opposite of structure however - they both exist at opposite ends of a spectrum, where structure promotes solidity and structure (and can on its own result in stiffness and rigidity), gesture focuses on motion and fluidity, which can result in things that are ephemeral, not quite feeling solid and stable.

With structure and spatial reasoning in his very bones, he still provides an excellent exploration of gesture, but in a visual language in something that we here appreciate greatly, and that's not something you can find everywhere.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.