Check Out NMA    About our Partnership    Collapse this Ad

Not getting the "Width of Opposite Ends" part of 250 box challenge

7:32 PM, Friday November 17th 2023

Hi everyone,

I'm progressing throught the 250 box challenge, (I'm on box 187) and I think it's going well. However, I'm really confused by the width of opposite ends rule.

I understand the rule with elipses. As a perfect circle moves across our view, the degree gets smaller as we look at the edge. That makes sense. Naturally that line of thinking applies to planes. Cool. But when it comes to incorperating that into boxes, I get lost. I always look and my own boxes and the examples on the page and- I can't really see it. If anything, the opposite end gets smaller and less wide, as a result of moving towards the vanishing point. I realize the explanation says that the shrinkage effect is seperate from the width effect, but I guess I just can't spot it. Is it only visible in extreme circumstances? Cause if I follow that lines to their vanishing point, it seems to make the opposite end smaller if anything.

Report
1 users agree
3:13 AM, Saturday November 18th 2023

Don't confuse getting wider with getting larger. In this instance, wider just means it is turned more toward the viewer. The back sides will still be smaller.

Personally I found worrying about width in this regard isn't as valuable as just making sure all your edges converge to the vp's properly. As long as you do that well enough the sides will just naturally turn toward the viewer as necessary.

10:25 AM, Saturday November 18th 2023

Ok cool. Thanks.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something we've used ourselves, or know to be of impeccable quality. If you're interested, here is a full list.
How to Draw by Scott Robertson

How to Draw by Scott Robertson

When it comes to technical drawing, there's no one better than Scott Robertson. I regularly use this book as a reference when eyeballing my perspective just won't cut it anymore. Need to figure out exactly how to rotate an object in 3D space? How to project a shape in perspective? Look no further.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.