Welcome to drawabox, and a big congrats on making it past Lesson 1. Let’s take this one exercise at a time, shall we?

Starting off, your superimposed lines look good, particularly in (what I assume to be) page 2 – they’re smooth, properly lined up at the start, and of a consistent trajectory. The arcing lines less so, but they’re very small, so that’s understandable. (As you know, the smaller a mark, the harder it is to engage the shoulder for it.) The ghosted lines/planes look good. They’re, more often than not, confident, but there is the usual hesitation, so I’ll remind you that it’s perfectly fine for your lines to miss, or stop short of, or overshoot their points, provided that they’re confident. The opposite (a wobbly, accurate line) is no good, so be mindful of that.

Moving on to the ellipse section, the table of ellipses exercise is mostly good. Your ellipses are occasionally a little wobbly, but as this, too, is limited to the smaller ones, so I take that as the cause of it. The rest of them are well done – smooth, and rounded – but I’d perhaps take an extra second or two ghosting each one, so that they’re a bit more snug against their frames. I have the same advice for your ellipses in planes. They look good, and I’m especially pleased to see how well you’ve performed with some of the larger ones, but I think you can do a tiny bit better, should you be a little more patient during the preparation phase. Save for that (so I don’t repeat myself 3 times!), the funnels are well done – the majority of them are snug, and properly cut into equal, symmetrical halves by their axes.

The plotted perspective exercise is well done. For the record, for those crooked back lines, the solution would’ve been to plot them such that they’re equidistant from the points, and also perpendicular to the horizon (as per the rules of 2pp), but that’s alright.

The rough perspective exercise, if I’m reading the order of your pages correctly, starts off as one would expect it to, improves nicely throughout the set, and then, I guess you get a little frustrated with it near the end, and give up? Anyway, most of what’s here is good, and fixing the issues is as simple as reminding yourself that you are the one that chooses when to commit to your points. If you don’t think that they’re perfect, simply don’t. To add to that, remember that you’re allowed to alter your points (if you plot them, and ghost them, and notice that they’re not quite right), so be sure to, until you’re satisfied, and then commit them to lines.

The rotated boxes exercise also feels a tiny bit rushed, but I suppose you could’ve just been a little overwhelmed. Specifically, the sides of the boxes facing us are well done, whereas their backsides are often missing, and, when they’re there, not especially snug against each other. That’s alright, however – really, most of what we check is whether the student has seen the exercise through to the end. You have, so you’re all good to go. As you move on to the box challenge, we’ll be getting into the construction of the box – both up front, and in the back – and you may retry this exercise then.

Finally, save for some overshooting issues (which make me wonder whether you’re plotting start/end points for your lines here), and some automatic reinforcing issues (remember that each line is to be drawn once, and only once, regardless of how it turns out!), the organic perspective exercise is well done. The boxes are well constructed, and they flow quite well, too, as a result of their size and foreshortening.