Lesson 4: Applying Construction to Insects and Arachnids

11:20 AM, Sunday February 28th 2021

4. Applying Construction to Insects and Arachnids - Google Drive

4. Applying Construction to Insects and Arachnids - Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PWYeIxzmIN8qk7Hgl_eVIMH3qXKyGLQm?usp=sharing

width=device-width,initial-scale=1,minimum-scale=1,maximum-scale=3,user-...

Greetings,

Here is my submission for creepy crawlies. I had a lot of frustration with doing these, and I'm not sure if I'm over critical or if there is some part of a lesson (or multiple ones) that did not connect in my brain. Or maybe I forgot something. But I feel like the crawlies aren't 3D and they end up very flat. I don't see what I'm doing wrong if this is the case. So I'm kinda stuck >_<

Thank you!

0 users agree
6:29 AM, Tuesday March 2nd 2021

Starting with your organic forms with contour lines, these are looking pretty good. You've stuck to the characteristics of simple sausages, your contour lines are confidently drawn, and fit snugly within the silhouette of the forms, and you're mindful of how the degree of those contour lines change along the length of the form.

Moving onto your insect constructions, honestly for the most part your work is as far as construction goes, mostly very well done. There are a few issues that would definitely contribute to the drawings feeling a little flatter than they otherwise could, but as a whole you are demonstrating a good grasp of how the forms combine together in 3D space to create solid, believable results.

The mistakes fall into a few categories:

  • Getting too complex too soon - maintaining the illusion that the constructions are 3D relies heavily on starting with forms that themselves read as being 3D without too much additional work. So working with strictly simple forms (balls, simple sausages, etc.) is key. We combine them and build upon them to achieve greater complexity in the whole, while maintaining the illusion of solidity. The page with the tree hopper and the hercules beetle both feature forms that are are dropped pretty much fully formed into the construction, rather than being built up piece by piece. For comparison's sake, here's a beetle horn demo showing how we can work through this step by step. Looking at how you approach certain parts of other constructions, it's clear to me that you are aware of this kind of approach, but that for whatever reason you opted not to use it here. These are the core principles of construction, and should be used consistently all across the board. Just for the sake of completeness, here's an ant head demo showing the same principles.

  • To the point above, I noticed that you seem to have employed a lot of different strategies for capturing the legs of your insects. It's not uncommon for students to be aware of the sausage method as introduced here, but to decide that the legs they're looking at don't actually seem to look like a chain of sausages, so they use some other strategy. The key to keep in mind here is that the sausage method is not about capturing the legs precisely as they are - it is about laying in a base structure or armature that captures both the solidity and the gestural flow of a limb in equal measure, where the majority of other techniques lean too far to one side, either looking solid and stiff or gestural but flat. Once in place, we can then build on top of this base structure with more additional forms as shown here, here, this ant leg, and even here in the context of a dog's leg (because this technique is still to be used throughout the next lesson as well). Just make sure you start out with the sausages, precisely as the steps are laid out in that diagram - don't throw the technique out just because it doesn't immediately look like what you're trying to construct.

  • Not defining the relationship between forms. When we add more forms onto a structure, it's critical that we define how these forms relate to one another in 3D space. This on its own can take something that might otherwise read as a shape (like a simple sausage) and immediately make it feel like a solid, 3D form. This of course works in conjunction with the forms themselves being simple to begin with.

  • Not drawing through forms. Sometimes you'll have a form's silhouette stop where it gets overlapped by another form. Drawing each form in its entirety is critical to ensure we understand how it sits in space, and how it can possibly relate to those around it. After all, a form doesn't stop existing where we can no longer see it.

  • Observation. This actually doesn't so much impact the illusion that the constructions are 3D, at least not directly - but some of your constructions do feel more simplified, in ways that suggest that you're not observing your references closely and frequently enough, and instead end up working from memory. Remember that in order to ensure that you're drawing an accurate, realistic construction of the given insect, you need to be deriving the information upon which you're basing your work right from the source. You should be studying your reference closely, identifying specific forms, and then looking away only long enough to transfer a given form to your drawing before returning your gaze to the reference.

All in all, you are doing a good job, but I want to see a couple more drawings showing that you understand what I've laid out above before I mark this lesson as complete.

Next Steps:

Please submit two more pages of insect drawings. Take care to observe your reference more closely, and to work through each construction step by step, not jumping too far ahead in the complexity of the forms you add.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
1:16 PM, Tuesday March 2nd 2021

Hello Uncomfortable,

Thank you for the input :)

I've done the revisions and you can find them here. I think I'm starting to get a better understanding of how to do these.

The insects with many legs are pretty tough on my brain when it comes to drawing the "invisible" parts.

6:48 PM, Tuesday March 2nd 2021
edited at 6:49 PM, Mar 2nd 2021

I was admittedly concerned when you came back with your revisions just a few hours after receiving the critique. I went to bed at 8am (a long night of critiques), and you'd posted your revisions within an hour, so they were fresh and waiting for me when I got up. That usually suggests that the student hasn't had the time to properly process the feedback they'd received and apply it to the requested drawings.

That said, your work is indeed looking fine. The legs could certainly be taken a bit further, and I think that closer observation and study of your reference would help you identify those additional forms a little more easily (working with high resolution reference images helps with this as well), but despite the overall simplification of the construction, the forms themselves are well constructed. Just note how much complexity can be found on an insect's leg, as shown in the ant leg I shared previously.

One additional piece of advice I have is that you should try to avoid the sort of "hotdog in a bun" look we get when we take an additional mass and just rest it flat against a sausage segment as you did here. Try to twist the additional mass a little bit as it wraps around the sausage structure, as shown here, to make it feel more organic and natural. Also, pay attention to how the silhouettes of those additional masses are shaped to specifically convey how they're gripping that structure, rather than ebing pasted on top of it.

This is something we'll continue practicing throughout Lesson 5, so I'll leave you to it and we'll address it more then if it is necessary. You can consider this one complete.

Next Steps:

Move onto lesson 5.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
edited at 6:49 PM, Mar 2nd 2021
7:25 AM, Wednesday March 3rd 2021

Hmmm, one hour is a bit strange. My timestamps shows 8.29 AM for the initial critique and 3:16 PM for my reply. I had nothing to do yesterday during my shift so I worked on the revisions throughout. Was this maybe a timezone...bug? xD

(I work as a software tester this sort of thing piques my curiosity)

Anyways, that's still good feedback. Sometimes this one forgets the importance of letting things sink in. I'll also practice on the side to improve those legs :3

Take care!

View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

The Art of Blizzard Entertainment

While I have a massive library of non-instructional art books I've collected over the years, there's only a handful that are actually important to me. This is one of them - so much so that I jammed my copy into my overstuffed backpack when flying back from my parents' house just so I could have it at my apartment. My back's been sore for a week.

The reason I hold this book in such high esteem is because of how it puts the relatively new field of game art into perspective, showing how concept art really just started off as crude sketches intended to communicate ideas to storytellers, designers and 3D modelers. How all of this focus on beautiful illustrations is really secondary to the core of a concept artist's job. A real eye-opener.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.