Lesson 5: Applying Construction to Animals

4:18 PM, Friday October 16th 2020

Imgur: The magic of the Internet

Direct Link: https://i.imgur.com/frfW4zO.jpg

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

Dear Uncomfortable/teaching assistant,

this was a really fun lesson! Since animals are such a complex subject, my drawing are filled with errors. My personal observation tells me I am making a lot of proportional errors (luckily proportions are not at the forefront of these exercises) and not using detail sparingly enough (mostly with furry creatures).

What confuses me the most though is head construction. Since there are so many planes and the transitions between them are very subtle it is hard for me to simplify the construction. There are several ways to go about constructing the same subject and this makes me wanna go into too much detail too soon. I realise we have to go from simple to complex but I don't have enough experience to know what the most efficient solutions are at a given point in a drawing. I tend to add too many planes witouth a proper, simple construction underneath it, and making contradictions along the way.

Another thing I am having trouble with is leg construction. More specifically, adding a correct intersecting line between two sausage forms. I try to observe my refference as best I can to make these decisions, but there is a lot of going with my gut involved as well. I'm sure I made several mistakes in this area - hopefully there's a simple solution for developing a good understanding of this.

Thank you in advance for the review,

MisterSpades

0 users agree
7:25 PM, Monday October 19th 2020

Alrighty! Starting with your organic intersections, these are for the most part coming along reasonably well - with the second page being a fair bit better than the first, suggesting that you were warming up nicely. One thing I do want to suggest however is that with this exercise, you always build upwards. You may feel that after the fact the base level of your pile doesn't have enough going on - don't worry about it. Since we have to consider the nature of the forms beneath the one we're adding when drawing its silhouette, if we were to add another form (like the more ball-like form on the far right of the second page) and then try and get one of the others to somehow sit on top of it, its silhouette was drawn without this other form present. So the result would not be convincing. Long story short - don't try and put a new form "underneath" an old one.

Moving onto your animal constructions, there's a lot of good stuff here, although there are definitely things we can work on to keep making progress.

Starting with your birds, I really loved your eagle and I felt this was an excellent example of construction employed well. Your drawings as a whole show a lot of thought being put towards how every element you add is three dimensional and solid, but it comes together especially well with this eagle, especially around its head. My only complaint is a very small one - if you draw part of something, draw it all. In this case, the wing on the other side of the body was cut off where it is overlapped by another - since our drawings here are all spatial reasoning exercises, our focus is on understanding how each part relates to its neighbours, and therefore each form must be drawn in its entirety, if it is to be drawn at all.

Moving on, one of the issues you remarked upon was with your leg constructions. On this front, I did notice a number of issues - or at least inconsistencies - which I had actually remarked upon in regards to your lesson 4 submission. It is clear that you made an effort to applying the sausage method to construction your legs in some of these, though you were not at all consistent in doing so, and you also did not actually apply the steps and principles of the technique as thoroughly as you were meant to:

  • First and foremost, there were plenty of cases where you didn't use the technique - tiger 2, the bears, the elephant, etc. As I explained in lesson 4, "The key to keep in mind here is that the sausage method is not about capturing the legs precisely as they are - it is about laying in a base structure or armature that captures both the solidity and the gestural flow of a limb in equal measure, where the majority of other techniques lean too far to one side, either looking solid and stiff or gestural but flat.

  • Once the sausage chains are in place, we can then build on top of this base structure with more additional forms." Again, I provided some examples of this in my lesson 4 critique: wrapping forms around sausages, common pitfalls when trying to add additional components to 3D structures, building up an ant's leg, building up a dog's leg. Based on how you approached things here, I get the impression you forgot about the information that was provided there in the last critique, at least in regards to this. In regards to this, I wanted to point out the fact that with your gorilla drawing, specifically its forearm, you drew the sausage structure but then went on to basically redraw its silhouette to account for the larger space. Modifications to silhouettes of forms occur in 2D space, because the silhouettes themselves are a 2D representation of the form. To actually make this change in 3D, one must actually introduce a new 3D form, and define its relationship with the structure that already exists (as shown in the diagrams above).

  • When you did use the sausage method, there were some cases where you were pretty loose in terms of the use of actual 'sausage' forms. As shown in this diagram, it is important that you stick to simple sausage forms (this is also stressed back in lesson 2's organic forms with contour lines exercise). In many places you have a tendency to use ellipses rather than sausages, as pointed out in the bottom left of the diagram.

In regards to the intersection lines between the sausages, your work here isn't too bad, but there are two things to keep in mind:

  • The contour lines themselves are sometimes shallow in their curvature, and don't capture the impression that they're wrapping around the form. You can see this issue addressed here. Making a point of overshooting those curves and hooking them back around (as mentioned in the notes I just linked) will help you overcome that.

  • How you draw those contour lines is one of the things that is not really found in the reference image. You use the reference image to determine the orientation of the forms themselves in space, but you then go on to apply your spatial reasoning skills to decide what degree the curve should be drawn with. Since this contour line basically designates a cross-sectional slice of both forms simultaneously, you need to consider how that slice is oriented relative to the viewer. If we we're looking at the animal from the side, then it's likely going to be quite narrow in its degree (as you've generally done). If we were looking from a higher angle, however, where we'd ostensibly be able to see the "face" of this slice (if the rest of the body weren't in the way), then the degree would be wider.

The next thing I wanted to touch upon - although this critique is already getting quite long - has to do with the use of additional forms. There are definitely places where you're using them well, and stressing the importance of "wrapping" those forms around the underlying structure, but these notes should help you think about how those forms can be integrated with one another, how we might have multiple additional forms pile upon one another, and where we should focus on giving those forms more complexity, and where they should have simpler curves.

I know you mentioned you were worried about your head constructions, but for the most part I'm pretty happy with these. That said, I did put down some notes on this bear drawing - mostly about ways you can define the other solid structures around the eye socket, like the brow ridge, the cheeks, and so on. You can also see this shown in this moose head demo.

I did point out that in this drawing in particular, it was quite small, not quite taking full advantage of the space available to you on the page, but in most cases you do appear to be drawing quite a bit larger, which is good. Just keep in mind that the more space you have, the more you'll be able to engage your brain's spatial reasoning skills. This will help with some of the smaller things like wrapping eyelids around eyeballs.

There's one last thing I wanted to address - this is a bit more present in some of your later drawings (like the elephants, mostly). Here your drawings end up splitting into two components. You've got the underlying construction, and then you redraw the entire creature on top with darker, richer lines, separating it into an 'underdrawing' and a 'clean-up pass'. This is something I want you to avoid moving forward - line weight is not intended to replace existing marks, but rather to emphasize them only, clarifying specific overlaps. Line weight goes on specific local sections of existing lines, and if you find yourself trying to add weight to the full length of a given mark, you're probably falling back into this approach.

That approach tends to promote the mentality that we're creating a "final drawing" - that we focus on decorating it, rather than focusing on our goal of visual communication. This comes out in your approach to texture in certain parts of the elephants as well, specifically the deeper furroughs in its skin. There you've somewhat forgotten the principles from Lesson 2, specifically those of implicit textural drawing techniques.

The thing to keep in mind is that everything we do in these drawings is focused on one goal - conveying information to the viewer. Through construction we give them the information they need to understand how they could manipulate the object in their hands. Through texture however, we convey what the viewer needs to know to understand what it'd feel like to run their fingers over its various surfaces. In order to achieve this, we're still focusing on specifically conveying 3D forms. Where you drew the lines on the elephant's skin, what we really want to be doing is implying the chunks of skin. Every mark drawn should be understood as a shadow being cast by some form preset in your object.

Anyway! This has definitely gotten very long, so I'm going to leave it there. I'll ask you to do a few additional pages of animal drawings below - you're definitely doing well overall, but I want to see more purposeful use of the sausage method when constructing your animals' legs.

Next Steps:

Please submit an additional 3 animal drawings, demonstrating proper use of the sausage technique, as well as the other points I raised throughout my critique.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
3:43 PM, Thursday October 22nd 2020

Dear Uncomfortable,

thank you for the critique! You've raised some good points, and I tried keeping those in mind as I drew the 3 additional pages.

Another thing I wanted to mention is that by the time I received the critique for lesson 4 I had already finished lesson 5, so that's why some of the mistakes were carried over. I'm kinda struggling with the 50-50 rule, because I am actually really enjoying the grind. I did start feeling burned out the end of the cylinder challenge, but I'm waiting for my elipse guides to arrive so this has given me some time to make some preety pictures :D.

Best regards,

MisterSpades

https://imgur.com/a/pzf0UFv

4:45 PM, Thursday October 22nd 2020

As explained back in Lesson 0, students receiving official feedback should absolutely not be moving onto the next lesson until they are given the all-clear to do so, specifically for this reason. Our critiques need to be based on work that is as up-to-date as possible, so if what you're submitting was completed prior to receiving the critique for the lesson's prerequisites, that severely hinders the efficacy of our feedback.

Fortunately lesson 5 is not a prerequisite for the cylinder challenge, so moving ahead on that would have been fine, but moving forward please do not jump ahead. If you have already gotten into lesson 6 and onwards, I will fully expect you to be redoing it.

Furthermore, the whole "enjoying the grind" thing suggests that you might not understand the purpose of the 50 percent rule. I actually allude to this at the end of that section from Lesson 0:

If you catch yourself thinking, "oh but I'm having fun just drawing lines and boxes," then you're missing the point.

The 50 percent rule isn't about giving students a break and forcing them to pace themselves. It's not something that can, or should, be ignored by those who have stronger endurance and a greater propensity for pushing through and grinding. This rule exists entirely because of students like that - the ones who without realizing it get addicted to the hand-holding a structured course provides, who lose sight of why they're learning to draw in the first place and who hyperfocus on the idea that they'll get into their own drawings once they feel they're adequately ready. They feel this way because, as explained in Lesson 0, they're not comfortable with the idea of drawing things that don't come out looking good, at least outside of the structure of an exercise or assignment. They thirst for the sense of direction and purpose, to know that all of their time is being spent properly, and to draw something for the hell of it and to have it come out badly feels like a "waste" of time.

Adhering to the 50% rule is meant to be hard. It is frustrating for everyone, so in this you are not alone. Keep in mind that the choice to draw something of your own, the choice to sit down and put even the worst, least interesting idea you have to paper, is a choice. It is something you have control over, and when you opt not to do so, that is a conscious decision you are making. So take control over your decisions, and adhere to the 50% rule. There are far too many students who ignore it, and of those who reach the end of the course, they tend to find themselves directionless, uncertain of what to do next, because they've been relying on this course as a map, without a greater map of their own to guide them forward.

Moving onto your animal drawings, these are considerably better than before. The frog and dog are very well done, though in the frog there is definitely a few places where you go way overboard with contour lines, drawing them because you feel you're supposed to rather than thinking about what they're contributing to the drawing. The complete lack of contour lines on the dog definitely shows that they were not needed in the first place, as the interaction between these forms still feels entirely believable and three dimensional.

The rhino is moving in the right direction, and admittedly is a complicated subject. I will however point out that when using those filled black shapes, you definitely have a mixture of some of them representing cast shadows, and others (like inside the ears) simply being spaces that were filled in, with no specific forms being implied. Always remember that - every filled shape you draw is a shadow shape, and every shadow is being cast by a form that you must be aware of.

As a side note, don't cross-hatch. If you're going to use hatching, keep it in one direction only, at least within this course. Since we don't get into how to use different kinds of hatching in this course, and even whether it is necessarily a good idea to use it with a fineliner, keep that stuff as simple and straightforward as possible, and don't overuse it.

To that point, I'm actually confused by a couple places where you opted to use hatching, like under where the dog's belly gets "tucked" in, it almost looks like you tried to cut back into the silhouette of the torso sausage, and to hide it by hatching the part that was removed. This is not an uncommon mistake, but it is one worth paying attention to - cutting back into the silhouette of a form will actually flatten out part of your construction, purely because the silhouette is a 2D shape. It's not the form itself, but like the footprint the form leaves on the page. Similar to the footprint of an animal travelling in the woods, we can judge many things by the footprint alone. The species of the animal, how big it was, how fast it was moving, etc. But if we change the footprint, we don't change the nature of the animal itself - we just make the footprint less useful.

There is a way to use this kind of "subtractive" construction correctly, as explained here, which involves splitting a form into multiple pieces by drawing contour lines along their surfaces. This results in two solid pieces that can exist on their own without the other, whilst still reading as three dimensional. This is however better suited to geometric construction. When dealing with organic construction, additive construction where we simply build up more forms (as you've been doing here for the most part) is preferable.

Long story short, don't just cut back into the silhouettes of forms that are meant to be three dimensional and voluminous. This is okay for things like leaves, because they're already flat, but not here.

Overall I'm still pleased with your progress. I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete.

Next Steps:

Move onto the 250 cylinder challenge.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Let's be real here for a second: fineliners can get pricey. It varies from brand to brand, store to store, and country to country, but good fineliners like the Staedtler Pigment Liner (my personal brand favourite) can cost an arm and a leg. I remember finding them being sold individually at a Michael's for $4-$5 each. That's highway robbery right there.

Now, we're not a big company ourselves or anything, but we have been in a position to periodically import large batches of pens that we've sourced ourselves - using the wholesale route to keep costs down, and then to split the savings between getting pens to you for cheaper, and setting some aside to one day produce our own.

These pens are each hand-tested (on a little card we include in the package) to avoid sending out any duds (another problem with pens sold in stores). We also checked out a handful of different options before settling on this supplier - mainly looking for pens that were as close to the Staedtler Pigment Liner. If I'm being honest, I think these might even perform a little better, at least for our use case in this course.

We've also tested their longevity. We've found that if we're reasonably gentle with them, we can get through all of Lesson 1, and halfway through the box challenge. We actually had ScyllaStew test them while recording realtime videos of her working through the lesson work, which you can check out here, along with a variety of reviews of other brands.

Now, I will say this - we're only really in a position to make this an attractive offer for those in the continental United States (where we can offer shipping for free). We do ship internationally, but between the shipping prices and shipping times, it's probably not the best offer you can find - though this may depend. We also straight up can't ship to the UK, thanks to some fairly new restrictions they've put into place relating to their Brexit transition. I know that's a bummer - I'm Canadian myself - but hopefully one day we can expand things more meaningfully to the rest of the world.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.