View Full Submission View Parent Comment
7:00 PM, Friday February 11th 2022

Your work here is kind of mixed.

When it comes to head construction, I can see that in this rhino you made a pretty good effort to apply the specific points shown in the informal head construction demo (I'd make some small adjustments but generally it clearly showed that you were following the demonstration). On the other two however, it's pretty clear that you weren't paying that much attention to the demo provided - on the wolf you have the eye socket shape wit the same number of corners, but you've got the point facing upwards rather than downwards, and so you don't end up with the wedge shape for the muzzle to fit into, nor the flat edge across the top for the forehead to rest upon. For the bear, you went with a 4 cornered diamond, which does not match the demo at all.

For leg construction, you seem to be stopping pretty early. In the bear you neglected to define any of the joints between the leg segments with contour lines (as stressed in the middle of the sausage method diagram. You're doing it more consistently in the rhino (except for one of the back legs), and same goes for the wolf. But the sausages are just the first step to leg construction - as I've called out to you in the past, we can then build upon those structures as shown here. You just stop at the basic sausages and call it a day.

In general, this also goes hand in hand with the fact that I think you are struggling to spend as much time as you should observing your reference. There's a lot of oversimplifying going on, and that simply occurs when we keep our faces glued to the page we're drawing on, and don't look at our reference frequently enough. Every single mark and form we put down should be informed by having looked at our reference and identified a specific element we wish to transfer over to our construction.

In addition to this, I know I shared this example of how to approach building up feet with boxier forms, using the corners of their silhouettes to distinguish the front/side/top planes, and then how we can further build upon them with yet more boxy forms for the toes. I had shared it with you on discord - I know this because I frequently went back into our convos to find it in order to share it with other students.

Lastly, it looks like the additional masses you drew on the bear's back don't reflect the points I raised in my last critique about how those silhouettes ought to be designed. I mentioned there that inward curves need to be used strategically, only in order to define a contact being made with another structure - basically where our mass gets pressed up against something else. Where such contact is not made, we thus must only use outward curves. If we look here on the bear we can see that inward curves were placed arbtirarily along the outer edge, where nothing is pressing against it.

Here's how those masses can be drawn to better establish a relationship with the existing structure in 3D space.

As a whole, I really don't think you're putting your all into what you've submitted here. I know in the past you've been prone to creating a lot of drawings, then only submitting a couple. I don't know if that's what you're doing here, but think about it this way - if you did 20 drawings when only 3 were requested, and they all took roughly the same amount of time, you could have spent 6 times more energy, effort, and time on the three that were requested. Quantity does not replace the quality of the effort and time you invest into each individual mark, and into following the instructions for every technique.

Lastly, your organic intersections are coming along decently, although note that when the cast shadow is farther away from the form, that tells us that there's more physical space between the form and the surface it's casting a shadow onto. This can be very useful when you've got, say, a form that has a section that's suspended in the air, but here it does give the impression that the sausage is lifting off a little bit.

Anyway, you'll find your revisions assigned below.

Next Steps:

Please submit 3 additional animal constructions. Submit every animal construction you produce, but as you're being told only to produce 3, that's what should be submitted.

Additionally:

  • On the drawing, note the times you started/stopped for each session, along with the date. I want you to keep track of just how much time you're spending on each drawing, how it's spread out, etc.

  • Be sure to review the lesson material and my past feedback prior to working on each construction - you're prone to forgetting things that have been called out. That's not your fault, but it is your responsibility to compensate for it, rather than to have me call out similar problems each time.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
5:06 AM, Thursday February 24th 2022
edited at 7:09 AM, Feb 24th 2022

https://imgur.com/a/4oBIlQC

How to do front view faces?

or construction when the face is fully on the side

edited at 7:09 AM, Feb 24th 2022
8:11 PM, Friday February 25th 2022
edited at 8:12 PM, Feb 25th 2022

I've put plenty of time into putting notes right on your work, so I'm not going to get into much detail in text:

I left the horse alone because it's the strongest of the bunch, although I did notice its eye socket was probably drawn without looking at the informal head construction demo, and deviates from it quite a bit. Its eyeball is also tiny, and needs to be much bigger.

Your cougar head actually wasn't fully facing forward (it's turning slightly more to our right) - this is usually the case, you rarely get angles that are facing full-forward or fully to the side, but when they do occur, they still apply the same principles of construction because these processes require us to understand how the forms we're building up exist in all three dimensions - not just from a single angle of view.

That said, I would strongly encourage you to pay attention to whether it's actually fully forward - if there's even a slight angling, it helps to emphasize it.

As a whole there are definitely areas where you're improving - I'm seeing a lot more cases where you're purposefully designing the silhouettes of your additional masses. There are however two main issues:

  • Your observation's not... great. I mean, there are a lot of things in your reference that you overlook entirely (the huge arc of the cougar's back, the fact that the top of the camel's head is almost a straight line, with only a very small bump at the brow/forehead area, or the fact that the camel's front leg is angling backwards, where you drew it coming forwards).

  • There are a ton of places where you're still just not applying what you do know - for example, in tackling the camel's mouth, you fell straight back to just drawing what you see in two dimensions, cutting across the silhouette of that existing structure.

I am glad that you noted down the time spent on each drawing. If I'm doing my math correctly, you spent:

  • 7 + 26 = 33 minutes on the cougar construction

  • 19 + 17 = 36 minutes on the camel construction

  • 28 minutes on the horse construction

This is way too little, especially considering that you need time to both observe your reference continuously, and to identify the purpose of each individual mark you want to make, and execute it to the best of your current ability. I'd like to see you spending several times that on each construction. For the same of comparison, I've spent over an hour already on this critique, and I haven't even had to construct a single animal in full - and have loads of experience that helps me work more quickly than you, along with the efficiency digital tools afford me.

You are seriously underestimating how long this should be taking you. To be completely honest, while you are definitely making progress and gradually addressing the issues I'm calling out, you're very much offloading the bulk of the work onto me. I call out a list of issues, you give yourself the time to make progress with one or two at most, then come back around to have me call out similar points again. Rather than putting your all into this, you're depending on me to do a lot of the thinking.

That's not how this course works, and I would not have invested this much time already if we were not friends. The way this course works is simple:

  • You do your absolute best, giving yourself as much time as you require to read, follow, and apply the instructions to the best of your ability. This means, above all else, investing a ton of time to avoid all the mistakes or slip-ups you can on your own.

  • You will still have made mistakes, or have misunderstandings - that's normal. So you submit your work for critique, and I break down all the areas where you can stand to improve, or where you're not quite grasping something.

  • You go back in and repeat the process with the new information - go back over the existing lesson material, go back over my feedback, and so on, and invest as much time as you reasonably can to apply it all to the best of your ability.

  • You submit it again - hopefully you show clear signs of growth on all the addressed fronts, but if you don't, that's okay. You did your best, you put lots of time into it, and we give it another go.

There are students who get full redos who have done their absolute best and held to everything - this happens when either I've over-extended myself in the rounds of feedback I've provided, or where it really is best for them to get a chunk of attempts, and a chance to go over everything anew, to give themselves a chance to review the material and get further with it on their own before seeking feedback again.

Giving me a grand total of 1.5 hours of work, however, when the feedback itself takes nearly as long, is severely imbalanced, and is not how this course is meant to work. I'm going to give you one more set of more limited revisions to demonstrate the absolute best of your effort, your time, and your energy, and if I still find it lacking, I'm going to send you for a full redo.

Next Steps:

Please submit another 3 animal constructions. I don't want to give you a specific amount of time to spend, so instead I'm going to ask for a minimum of 3 days to be spent on each individual drawing - meaning, when you write your start/end times, there should be sessions from 3 distinct dates at minimum.

Build up your constructions gradually, spend as much time as you need to execute each mark to the best of your ability. Yes, skinny sausages are hard, but they're a crap ton harder when you're only giving yourself a grand total of 30 seconds to make each one.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
edited at 8:12 PM, Feb 25th 2022
4:48 AM, Monday April 18th 2022
View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Pentel Pocket Brush Pen

Pentel Pocket Brush Pen

This is a remarkable little pen. Technically speaking, any brush pen of reasonable quality will do, but I'm especially fond of this one. It's incredibly difficult to draw with (especially at first) due to how much your stroke varies based on how much pressure you apply, and how you use it - but at the same time despite this frustration, it's also incredibly fun.

Moreover, due to the challenge of its use, it teaches you a lot about the nuances of one's stroke. These are the kinds of skills that one can carry over to standard felt tip pens, as well as to digital media. Really great for doodling and just enjoying yourself.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.