View Full Submission View Parent Comment
3:21 PM, Tuesday July 14th 2020
edited at 3:23 PM, Jul 14th 2020

I've put down a lot of notes directly on top of your drawings, which you'll find in this album. There's a lot of different things there, but I'll outline a couple major, repeated issues that I'm seeing come up frequently:

  • You tend to draw ellipses instead of sausages when constructing some of your legs. You've got them right in a few places, but overall I think you need to review what the difference is, here.

  • You also need to keep getting in the habit of hooking your contour curves around, rather than letting them fly straight off the surfaces on which they're meant to sit.

  • Your head constructions in the demo drawings are generally pretty good, but you very consistently forget the importance of getting those 'pieces' (eye socket, muzzle, etc.) to fit right up against one another in your own drawings.

  • You always draw your ribcage mass way too small. As explained here, it should be 1/2 the length of the torso.

  • It's pretty easy to forget about the big engine shoulder and hip muscles, but they're really big and will integrate with the other additional masses you add to your drawings.

  • When adding additional masses, you're making some headway in thinking about how they wrap around in a few areas, but more often than not you're still stamping them as separate shapes, without considering how they're supposed to wrap around the underlying forms when you draw their silhouettes. I imagine this goes hand-in-hand with the difficulty you have in wrapping your contour curves around forms.

In general, I'm noticing that when you put marks down, you're exhibiting a lot of uncertainty - it results in sketchy behaviour in some places, and gaps between lines that really should be connecting to impose a sense of solidity to your forms. While it's totally understandable that you're not confident about what you're doing here, it's important that you fake it anyway. Decide first what the nature of the form you wish to draw is to be, then figure out the individual marks you need to put it down on the page. Then commit to each individual stroke (using the ghosting method of course), putting one mark down for each required line. Don't leave any gaps between those lines, and most of all, when you're drawing lines that are intended to sit along the surface of another form, force yourself to think about how that line is actually running along a 3D surface - not just marks on a flat page.

I didn't point this out in the redline notes, but if you take a look at this example, there's a lot of complexity and nuance once can capture through adding individual additional forms to the leg structures of the animals. Each one is added in such a way that it actually wraps around the structure that exists prior to it, and with that you slowly build up these little bits of volume.

Edit: I forgot to mention this - while the donkey proportions are all out of whack, I wouldn't call it botched. Proportions matter, but the construction of believable, solid forms that integrate and interact with one another in a realistic fashion are far more important, and in this regard you've done a decent job with this demonstration. It's entirely possible to get your proportions totally wrong, but actually nail the construction and end up with a good result that is actually believable - as though you were just faithfully capturing a horribly disfigured animal that's roaming around out there somewhere.

Next Steps:

First, I want you to draw some sausage forms and practice wrapping other masses around them, similarly to the leg example I included at the end of my critique. You can also try some larger sausages (like imaginary torsos) and work on building up additional masses on those.

Then I'd like you to do another 5 animal drawings, on your own. Focus on animals that don't have too much poofy fur, where you can see a good deal of their musculature. Horses, deer, lions, buffalo, etc.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
edited at 3:23 PM, Jul 14th 2020
6:41 AM, Friday July 17th 2020

https://imgur.com/a/SBH2tSk

A few pages of my attempts to build and fit forms together and 5 more animals. This time the animals have little fur on them to obscure their muscles/fat.

I tried to take note of what you told me in the drawings but, I have had limited success in improving this time.

Still having trouble with a lot of the basics. It still looks as if my forms are far too basics and I'm not building them up enough or I'm relying too much on the basic sausage shape on it's own.

Accuracy is still a major issue. I've been trying to work on it but, I'm still suffering from the inability to draw the things in front of me.

Foreshortening threw me for a loop on the last image (the horse) so it's not done very well at all.

7:34 PM, Friday July 17th 2020

Starting with the first few pages of additional forms on sausage structures, I outlined your main issues here. Basically, the specific positioning of your additional forms matters a lot. That little sharp corner we get right where we get the mass to wrap around the underlying structure has to fall right at the edge of the underlying structure, because that's what gives the impression that the form continues along behind the form. What you're doing right now is very similar to drawing a contour curve that doesn't actually stretch all the way across from one edge of the form to the other. It ends up reading as complex flat shapes that are just stamped on top of one another.

I'm also noticing a continued tendency to draw your ribcages way too small - this is something I pointed out in my last critique. Again, read through this section. It states that the ribcage should occupy about 1/2 the length of the torso. You're not drawing equally sized masses for the ribcage and pelvis - the pelvis is FAR smaller.

Overall, looking through these sausage structures I can't help but get the sense that you're drawing more than thinking. It's normal to be frustrated, but I don't see a lot of patient consideration of what you're doing. Instead, as you push through you make more common mistakes, like the prevalence of drawing ellipses rather than sausage forms in your last two pages of this exercise. You also frequently don't draw through your ellipses, as you're meant to do for each and every ellipse you draw through these lessons.

To that point, your animal constructions seem to follow the same kind of pattern. Most students end up having to put a lot of time into each and every mark they draw, into observing their references not only carefully but constantly, regularly looking back at their reference to identify where the next major form in their structure has to go, ensuring that they're not working from their memory.

Looking at a number of factors - the amount of time between submissions, for example - I genuinely think you just go in with far higher expectations of how quickly you should be able to draw these things. Your Lesson 4 work was marked as complete on June 17th, and your initial Lesson 5 submission was on July 6th - not quite three weeks. While that's not an unreasonable amount of time, it's not unusual for students to take a full month or more to get through this lesson.

Then, we can look at your latest revisions, which were submitted about two and a half days after being assigned. That's more than a third of the original work assigned with the lesson, done in less than a seventh of the time. Combine things like the 50% rule assigned back in Lesson 0, and that is by no means enough time to complete the work as it is intended.

Long story short, yes - you do struggle with this work quite a bit, but I can also see progress. While half the time you forget to draw sausages instead of ellipses, when you do draw proper sausage chains, they've improved greatly over how they were drawn in lesson 4. The issue appears to be that you do not invest as much time as is needed to every single mark you draw, to observing your reference constantly instead of relying on memory, and to follow the instructions as they are written.

You may have certain disadvantages - for example, forgetfulness when it comes to the many issues frequently raised - but none of those are inherently stopping you from learning to draw, it just makes the process more difficult. What is hindering you most is that these difficulties are causing you to become frustrated, and that frustration is no doubt causing you to expect far more of yourself than you should.

I am going to ask you to do this lesson over, as a new submission - but before that, I'd like to see examples of you actually adhering to the 50% rule from Lesson 0 (which is explained here). Show me what you draw outside of Drawabox, show me your attempts at drawing the things that ultimately spur you to learn how to improve.

Next Steps:

Do the full lesson over, and post it as a new submission rather than as a revision. Prior to doing this, show me some of the drawing you do outside of Drawabox, outside of following courses, as set out back in Lesson 0 as something that should receive at least 50% of the time you spend drawing.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
2:51 AM, Tuesday August 4th 2020
edited at 8:47 AM, Aug 4th 2020

Alright I have a lot of work I've been doing outside the course.

Here are my attempts at some of the work that inspires me along with the sources:

https://imgur.com/a/6WPzHPn

These were done after I read your critique.

It's mostly video game box art, movie posters and, album art work.

Scifi and Fantasy. Most of the artwork I like is usually from the 1970s to the mid 90s.

As much as i want to work in color it's kind of pointless when I don't know how to get my line work in even vaugely correct and my shading is pretty bad.

Other work I've been doing before my last submission include:

80s; Fashion/Hair style:

https://imgur.com/a/Jj7ehRz

I've been doing rather poorly at both poraits and figure in spite of practicing specifically for them. I started Loomis's Fun with a Pencil around october last year because a lot of people have been telling me that book would teach the very basics of drawing. I recently finished it but, I feel as though I didn't really gain anything from doing it:

https://imgur.com/a/7SJ2tkC

Pages 80 through 90.

I was actually focusing on portraits for quiet a while this yet but, I failed to really improve.

https://imgur.com/a/URRrQX2

These were done late 2019 / early 2020.

most of these are from movies and television but, I have lost the original images.

There is so much I want to do but I feel I lack the foundation to actually move on to more complex things.

edited at 8:47 AM, Aug 4th 2020
View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Let's be real here for a second: fineliners can get pricey. It varies from brand to brand, store to store, and country to country, but good fineliners like the Staedtler Pigment Liner (my personal brand favourite) can cost an arm and a leg. I remember finding them being sold individually at a Michael's for $4-$5 each. That's highway robbery right there.

Now, we're not a big company ourselves or anything, but we have been in a position to periodically import large batches of pens that we've sourced ourselves - using the wholesale route to keep costs down, and then to split the savings between getting pens to you for cheaper, and setting some aside to one day produce our own.

These pens are each hand-tested (on a little card we include in the package) to avoid sending out any duds (another problem with pens sold in stores). We also checked out a handful of different options before settling on this supplier - mainly looking for pens that were as close to the Staedtler Pigment Liner. If I'm being honest, I think these might even perform a little better, at least for our use case in this course.

We've also tested their longevity. We've found that if we're reasonably gentle with them, we can get through all of Lesson 1, and halfway through the box challenge. We actually had ScyllaStew test them while recording realtime videos of her working through the lesson work, which you can check out here, along with a variety of reviews of other brands.

Now, I will say this - we're only really in a position to make this an attractive offer for those in the continental United States (where we can offer shipping for free). We do ship internationally, but between the shipping prices and shipping times, it's probably not the best offer you can find - though this may depend. We also straight up can't ship to the UK, thanks to some fairly new restrictions they've put into place relating to their Brexit transition. I know that's a bummer - I'm Canadian myself - but hopefully one day we can expand things more meaningfully to the rest of the world.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.