0 users agree
6:48 PM, Thursday March 25th 2021

Starting with your organic forms with contour curves, these are generally coming along pretty well. You're making a conscious choice to stick to the characteristics of simple sausages, and while a few of them have ends that come out a little stretched (not entirely circular), it's clear that you're aiming in the right direction. The contour curves themselves are a little hesitant at times though, which leads to a touch of wobbling, so keep an eye on that and keep working on achieving a confident execution. Also, mind the degree shift for your contour curves, which is explained in this section as well as in the newly updated ellipses video. Basically, the degree of the contour lines needs to shift, getting wider as we slide away from the viewer.

Moving onto your insect constructions, there's both good and less good here, but overall I think the main issues can be addressed fairly easily. In terms of strengths, I'm seeing you working with a lot of separate components, building your constructions up to better understand how they eixst in 3D space.

The main issue I'm seeing is that you seem to be separating your drawings into lines that are drawn more faintly, and lines that are drawn to be much darker and heavier. It seems very much as though you're starting with a more explorative "underdrawing", then only drawing the lines you really want to include as part of your actual construction afterwards, drawing them with a heavier weight to make them stand out against the previous ones. This approach, as explained here in Lesson 2's form intersections isn't appropriate for this course.

First and foremost, it is extremely important that you treat every single form you draw as being a solid, tangible part of the construction. If we allow ourselves to approach out drawings with the flexibility and freedom of simply putting marks down on a flat page, then we leave ourselves open to making the kinds of marks that remind the viewer that they're just looking at a drawing - not at an actual 3D object. One way we can keep ourselves from doing that is to ensure that once we've added a 3D form to the construction, we do not redraw or alter its silhouette at all.

For example, looking at this one, I've highlighted one of many areas where you cut back across the silhouette of a form you'd constructed. We can see this at play quite a bit throughout its legs as well. You appear to have reinforced the inner line weigh line weight to refine the silhouette - but unfortunately in doing so, we don't actually change the nature of the form that exists in 3D space. We merely break off the connection between them, leaving us only with the impression of a flat shape on the page.

Here's a demonstration of why this flattens out our drawing. While that example shows it in the context of cutting back into a silhouette, it happens when we make any 2D modifications to our drawing, including extending out a silhouette, redrawing a silhouette entirely, or adding flat shapes - for example, where you added spikes onto the same insect's head, where each one was drawn as an open shape rather than a full enclosed 3D form.

Instead, we have to work purely through the addition of new, complete, enclosed, 3D forms, defining their relationship with the existing structure either by adding a contour line to establish how they intersect (like lesson 2's form intersections), or by modifying the silhouette of the form so it actually wraps around the existing structure where it makes contact as shown here. Here are some examples of additive construction, in this beetle horn demo as well as in this ant head demo.

So that's basically the big issue. You seem to be running into it primarily because of how you try to use line weight, going back over lines to establish a "clean up pass" and distinguish the lines you want to keep from those you'd prefer be forgotten. Unfortunately, that's not how line weight works - at least within the context of this course. Line weight serves to clarify how specific forms overlap, and should be limited to localized areas instead of being drawn all the way around the silhouettes of your forms. Also, line weight should be kept quite subtle (shouldn't be really obviously heavy), and should be drawn with confidence using the ghosting method instead of traced more carefully over your existing lines. This is because we don't want to get caught up in following the line as it exists on the page. Anything that reminds us or the viewer that we're really just drawing lines on a page should be avoided. Always think in 3D space, or strive to.

So for example, looking at this praying mantis, the use of heavy line weight ends up working to really flatten things out. While line weight has to be quite subtle, just a whisper to the viewer's subconscious to clarify how those overlaps are arranged, we can of course be much more broad and bold with our cast shadows. The only difference is that cast shadows can't just cling to the silhouette of a given form - they have to be cast onto another form's surface. Sometimes students confuse the two, leading to very thick line weight.

In regards to the appropriate use of all this additive construction, putting your early lines down confidently (instead of lightly and faintly) and so on, I'd recommend you take a look at this more detailed lobster demo from the informal demos page. Pay attention to how I work through every step, and how every form I construct is respected as an important part of the overall result.

Looking at how you approach your leg construction, I can definitely see that you're making clear efforts to stick to the sausage method. That is good to see. Taking that further, here's an approach you can employ to more effectively build upon those base armatures, to build up more bulk where it's needed. Wrapping forms around each other in this way - ensuring that the silhouette actually makes direct contact with the underlying structure, so the 3D relationship can be more clearly defined (even if this means breaking it into multiple additional masses) can work very effectively, both in constructing legs, as well as in other circumstances. You can see this at play both in this ant leg demo and even in this dog leg demo, as this will be used extensively in Lesson 5 as well.

So! I've shared quite a bit with you here. While I do feel overall you're moving in the right direction, I do want to give you the opportunity to apply what I've pointed out here. So, I'm going to assign a few revisions below.

Next Steps:

Please submit 3 more pages of insect constructions.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
9:59 AM, Tuesday April 6th 2021

https://imgur.com/gallery/IGBGBTH here is the link to my revisions.

I also had a question regaurding the sphere and sausage forms we draw for our constructions. When were drawing the head, thorax, abdomen and limbs are we still supposed to go over the forms a couple times or do we just go around once and thats it?

4:59 PM, Thursday April 8th 2021

To answer your question, we specifically draw "through" (around 2 times) our ellipses only, because it leans into our arm's natural desire to make elliptical shapes. For this same reason, you definitely don't want to draw through your sausage forms, because that'll start turning them more into ellipses instead.

You're definitely moving in the right direction here, and I can see you attempting to use a lot of the techniques I demonstrated in my last critique. There is however still plenty of room for improvement:

  • When constructing heads, you will likely have an easier time starting with a smaller ball and then building up. For example, the hornet drawing ended up with a really big starting head mass, and so everything else you attached was really dwarfed in comparison. Instead, start with a smaller mass (even a normal sphere) and then try to build off it. See how that feels.

  • When adding masses to your leg segments, you approached it in two ways - sometimes you'd wrap a couple different masses around, other times you'd just envelop the whole segment with another larger form. Definitely use the first approach - using multiple forms, and wrapping them individually around the segment in different places. The reason this is better, as shown here, is because each additional mass's silhouette makes more direct contact with the underlying structure, instead of ending up with the segment just floating loosely inside of it.

  • Keep working on achieving simple sausage forms. I can see that you're trying, but because it's pretty tricky to draw them at such a small scale, especially when they're narrow, it can be quite difficult.

You'll continue to improve with practice, but I can see that you're aiming for the right things. I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete, but keep the points I've raised here in mind as you move forwards.

Next Steps:

Move onto lesson 5.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
9:32 AM, Friday April 9th 2021

Thanks again for all the helpful information.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
PureRef

PureRef

This is another one of those things that aren't sold through Amazon, so I don't get a commission on it - but it's just too good to leave out. PureRef is a fantastic piece of software that is both Windows and Mac compatible. It's used for collecting reference and compiling them into a moodboard. You can move them around freely, have them automatically arranged, zoom in/out and even scale/flip/rotate images as you please. If needed, you can also add little text notes.

When starting on a project, I'll often open it up and start dragging reference images off the internet onto the board. When I'm done, I'll save out a '.pur' file, which embeds all the images. They can get pretty big, but are way more convenient than hauling around folders full of separate images.

Did I mention you can get it for free? The developer allows you to pay whatever amount you want for it. They recommend $5, but they'll allow you to take it for nothing. Really though, with software this versatile and polished, you really should throw them a few bucks if you pick it up. It's more than worth it.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.