View Full Submission View Parent Comment
0 users agree
10:54 PM, Monday November 9th 2020

Starting with your organic forms with contour lines, these are mostly well done, aside from a bit of hesitation I'm noticing in the execution of your marks. Remember that executing your marks confidently, without any sort of hesitation from the moment they touch the page is important, as it helps keep our marks smooth and simple.

Overall you've approached your insect constructions quite well, but there are some issues I want to address. The biggest one doesn't actually show up that frequently in your work, but it's still worth discussing as it's not an uncommon issue. Looking here, I've pointed out how in your mantidfly drawing, you've treated the initial masses you drew as though they weren't actually solid forms upon which the rest of your construction was built. You've treated them as though they were not actually solid forms, but rather a loose plan. Constructional drawing hinges on the idea that every single addition to the construction is a solid, three dimensional form. Once one of these forms are drawn, we can't simply modify its silhouette by either cutting across it or extending it. Every change has to occur in 3D space. There are ways to actually cut into a form in three dimensions as explained here, but this isn't particularly well suited to organic subject matter. So, in cases like this, we work largely additively, which means building up new forms and defining how they relate to the underlying structure, either by defining the connection to it or establishing how this new form wraps around.

Now, this is something you've definitely done a better job at throughout much of the lesson, and honestly as you move through the lesson you demonstrate continued improvement on this front.

Another issue that stood out to me was that for this rhino beetle's head/horns, you jumped into a pretty complex form right from the get-go, and as a result, it never really felt all that solid or three dimensional. Construction forces us to work with simple forms because it ensures that each one's going to feel solid. Then we connect them to one another to build up that complexity, bit by bit, never jumping too far ahead to a point where that structure isn't supported by what's already there. Here's a demonstration of how I would build up a more complex horn, though it isn't quite the kind of horn seen here.

Lastly, don't forget that back in lesson 2 I explain that form shading will not be a part of this course, and should not be included in your drawings. It is easy to mistake the idea of "detail" with "decoration", but that is not an accurate comparison. Instead, our drawings are divided into two overall stages - construction and texture - and their goals are very similar, both being focused on the communication of visual information.

With construction, we convey to the viewer what they need to know to understand how they might manipulate this object in their hands. Through texture, we convey to them what they need to know to understand what it'd feel like to run their fingers over the object's various surfaces. It all pertains to the forms - the macro structural forms, or the micro textural ones, but it is all a matter of communicating elements that exist within 3D space. We are not simply trying to make things look good (which is what decoration is about), but rather to serve a more concrete, less subjective purpose. Always keep this in mind when approaching texture, and remember that a key part to being able to convey that information is to actually observe it and study it from your reference first.

Anyway! All in all you are making good progress, so I'll go ahead and mark this lesson as complete.

Next Steps:

Feel free to move onto lesson 5.

This critique marks this lesson as complete.
11:06 PM, Monday November 9th 2020

Thank you very much for the feedback! I struggled sometimes as I think my underlying forms were the wrong size in some cases. Thank you I'll definitely take your advice on board in the next lesson

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
PureRef

PureRef

This is another one of those things that aren't sold through Amazon, so I don't get a commission on it - but it's just too good to leave out. PureRef is a fantastic piece of software that is both Windows and Mac compatible. It's used for collecting reference and compiling them into a moodboard. You can move them around freely, have them automatically arranged, zoom in/out and even scale/flip/rotate images as you please. If needed, you can also add little text notes.

When starting on a project, I'll often open it up and start dragging reference images off the internet onto the board. When I'm done, I'll save out a '.pur' file, which embeds all the images. They can get pretty big, but are way more convenient than hauling around folders full of separate images.

Did I mention you can get it for free? The developer allows you to pay whatever amount you want for it. They recommend $5, but they'll allow you to take it for nothing. Really though, with software this versatile and polished, you really should throw them a few bucks if you pick it up. It's more than worth it.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.