View Full Submission View Parent Comment
11:39 PM, Saturday July 11th 2020

I have to admit that while there is definitely improvement all in the right direction here, coming back with 6 individual drawings in under 24 hours is always a red flag that the student may not have put in as much time and effort into each individual drawing as they could have. Additionally, while I did not restrict you from including draw-alongs with demonstrations in these revisions, it is certainly something I'm taking note of. I do have some information to share about how to look at the demonstrations, but I'm going to focus my critique on the one drawing you did at the end on your own.

So, the thing about the informal demos is that those at the top of the list are newer than those further down. Because of how the course itself is continually being updated and altered (the process of critiquing students brings to light ways in which I can explain concepts more effectively, and also allows me to develop more successful techniques for how to approach these exercises), there are going to be areas where older demos don't reflect certain techniques that are stressed in later ones. The demos are there because they're still valuable, and serve an important role until I can actually find the time to create a more succinct, up-to-date collection of demonstrations (which I should be able to start getting to soon, as I've put in notice at my day job).

That said, if you look at, say, the elephant demo, you'll notice that the leg constructions don't apply the sausage method, which I stress in more recent ones. That is for the simple reason that I hadn't developed that methodology at that point.

This is basically just something to keep in mind when digesting the demonstrations - you still do need to think critically about what you've learned in the lesson thus far, and identify where those newer techniques override the ones presented in older demonstrations.

So, looking at your komodo dragon drawing, this is certainly moving more in the right direction in a number of ways. Your marks, while still not as confident and "complete" (in terms of drawing entire closed forms without gaps), are visibly less tailored towards keeping things clean and hidden away. You're also pushing the use of the sausage method much further. There are of course issues which I've outlined here. Since I've written a lot of notes there, I'll outline them a bit more cleanly below:

  • One thing to keep in mind is that no mark should be drawn without considering precisely what its purpose is, whether it is the best stroke to accomplish that task, and whether any other mark is currently attempting to accomplish the same task. Specifically here this relates to your tendency to draw more contour lines than are really necessary. Contour lines tend to suffer from diminishing returns, where the first will have a more significant impact, but your second will have less of one, your third will be even less, and so on. Furthermore, different kinds of contour lines will be more effective overall - like the contour lines that define the relationship between different forms in 3D are always, by their very nature in defining those relationships, more effective at creating the illusion that the forms are three dimensional, than the contour curves that wrap around the surface of a single form. In most cases you can actually get away with just the contour lines that define those connections/relationships.

  • Your forms tend to still have gaps, which immediately undermine the illusion that they're actually solid. If you look at the drawing of the komodo dragon's leg in the bottom left there, you'll see how every single form I've drawn is complete. I'm not being timid or tentative here - I decide a particular form needs to exist, and I draw it in its entirety, fully enclosed, within the space. My focus is on giving the impression that this form first and foremost is solid and 3D, and then thinking about how it relates to the forms around it.

  • When adding additional forms, don't give them artificially sharp corners. Think of those masses like chunks of meat - meat itself, without actually being cut, doesn't come to its own sharp corners - it's more malleable with gentle curves that will wrap around whatever it's placed upon, whilst maintaining its own volume.

  • Your head construction doesn't really reflect the kind of specific structure shown in the tapir head demo, where we establish the different components as though they're pieces of a 3D puzzle that fit together. The eye sockets ought to be buttressed on its various sides by other components such as the muzzle, the brow ridge, the cheekbone, etc. Having them fit together in this specific manner is key to making the head feel solid, and having all those pieces feel grounded.

  • To take this point further, I drew my own approach at this head construction here. There are no additional notes, but the key comes down to how every component is clearly defined, enclosed, and drawn with confidence and purpose. I'm not timidly putting down subtle suggestions - I'm clear and direct in every constructional choice, focusing on how each form or addition exists in 3D space. Also for the tongue, I've approached it constructionally as well, similarly to how we tackled the leaves in lesson 3.

One point I didn't mention in the redline notes is that I went looking for a komodo dragon reference from which to do my head drawing, and I believe I found one that appears to match yours' pose pretty accurately, here. I also noticed that there were no larger images of this aside from this one, which is somewhat cropped. I'm not sure if you were able to find your own high resolution image, but resolution is pretty important - there's a lot going on, especially with the scaly texture of its skin that can make it quite a bit more difficult to identify all that's going on. Definitely be sure to work from high resolution images - even the size of the larger, cropped one I found is the bare minimum of what I'd generally want to work with. Given that I have more experience with what to look for, I can work a little better with low resolution images, but I would by no means ask that of you at this stage.

You are indeed making progress, but I'm going to assign 4 more pages with a few more restrictions, which I'll list below. I am definitely expecting that my critique on your next set will be a simple "much better", rather than another lengthy critique.

As a side note about the whole balance between the finding a balance between fun and improvement, that is certainly something all must struggle with - however, not within the context of this course. The drawings you do for this course are specifically just exercises we're doing to help develop your skills. The stuff you do for fun, which is extremely important, should be entirely separate, as described back here in Lesson 0.

Next Steps:

Submit 4 additional animal drawings, adhering to the following restrictions:

  • I only want you to do one such drawing per day. This is specifically so you're not put in any position where you might be inclined to focus on the completion of many in a given sitting, which can even subconsciously cause you to spend less time on a given drawing than you otherwise could.

  • All of these drawings should be your own - none of them should be done from the available demonstrations.

  • Do not employ any contour lines that rest on the surface of a single form (like the komodo dragon's tail). You are absolutely allowed and encouraged to include contour lines that define the connection between different forms, however.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
3:36 AM, Saturday August 1st 2020

Second round of revisions can be found here. https://imgur.com/a/p82bmJM

I took some time off in between and did one a day. I am not confident about these at all to be honest. I feel like I am going backwards. I understand if I need to do a third round of revisions.

Alan

3:28 PM, Monday August 3rd 2020

So looking at your drawings here, there's improvement and growth in some areas, and a bit of a backslide in others. What stands out to me most is that where in your last round of revisions, there was a much greater focus on putting your marks down confidently (like with this raccoon), whereas this time around you've gone back to being hesitant and almost sketchy with your lines. Notice how the lines in this one appear quite faint, and you end up with a lot of gaps. Throughout most of your drawings you also end up with a lot of repeated linework where you've automatically reinforced lines repeatedly by reflex - not applying the ghosting method, not planning and preparing before each and every mark, and executing with a single stroke.

Out of the lot, this deer is definitely the strongest, though you definitely should be more careful in capturing the entire drawing, not letting it get cut off along the bottom (unless the legs actually did get cut off in the drawing itself).

In the deer, you're also making somewhat better use of the sausage method - in the other drawings you're more inconsistent in its use, drifting to forms that are not 'simple sausages' (as explained back in lesson 2 and in this diagram). This method is really specific - it's not just about chaining any arbitrary forms together, sticking to simple sausages helps maintain a solid structure that at the same time establishes a sense of flow and gesture. Once in place, you can them add bulk wherever necessary by adding additional forms as shown here.

Another issue that stood out to me that was what I pointed out in the top right of these notes I gave you last time, about hard corners on your additional forms. We can see these present in this drawing - they give the impression that the mass is somehow buttressing against some other form, but there is no reasonable mass there for it to be wrapping against.

Conversely, if we look at the deer again, we can see a similar "sharp corner" for the mass along its back, but it is much more obviously because of how that mass is right up against the thigh muscles and the neck. It's still not perfect, but at least here there's a good reason for that mass to behave in such a way.

Now, last of all, you appear to have completely ignored one of the restrictions I gave you for these revisions. When assigning them, I stated:

Do not employ any contour lines that rest on the surface of a single form (like the komodo dragon's tail). You are absolutely allowed and encouraged to include contour lines that define the connection between different forms, however.

You have continued to use countless contour lines that sit along the surface of a single form throughout these drawings. As I mentioned, the ones that define the connections between different forms are perfectly fine, but you've got plenty of additional contour lines that you've drawn on your additional masses, on the deer's antlers, on the ears of the last drawing, and so on. This tells me that you did not read my critique all that closely, or that if you did, you didn't ensure that you were aware of what was being asked of you on the next day, or the day after that.

At the end of the day, the main issue that you're encountering is that you're having trouble following the instructions that are given to you. This is as normal as anything else, but understanding what your primary hurdle is, is a critical part of learning to get beyond it.

I'm going to assign additional pages once again, and I will continue to do so if you don't adhere to what I ask.

Next Steps:

4 more animal drawings, and again:

  • Don't use any contour lines that don't define the connection between different forms.

  • Don't sketch. We are not experimenting on the page, we are planning and preparing every individual stroke. In the previous submission where you primarily drew along with demos, your linework was much more confident, and there weren't so many repeated strokes and gaps. Note the fact that when drawing a lot of the contour lines that you weren't supposed to include, you tended to draw them without much thought or planning as to how they'd wrap around the underlying forms. You're leaning more on drawing rather than thinking through the spatial problems you're trying to solve.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
2:41 AM, Saturday September 19th 2020

Ok took some time off (Due to personal matters) found some time to continue Lesson 5. Worked with Elodin this week as I was getting pretty frustrated. Needed to try something different.

Latest revisions can be found here.

https://imgur.com/a/FTrjDf0

Also got a new scanner. This goes up to 1200 dpi. Lines look alot clearer. Enjoy! Thanks for the C+C.

View more comments in this thread
The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
The Art of Brom

The Art of Brom

Here we're getting into the subjective - Gerald Brom is one of my favourite artists (and a pretty fantastic novelist!). That said, if I recommended art books just for the beautiful images contained therein, my list of recommendations would be miles long.

The reason this book is close to my heart is because of its introduction, where Brom goes explains in detail just how he went from being an army brat to one of the most highly respected dark fantasy artists in the world today. I believe that one's work is flavoured by their life's experiences, and discovering the roots from which other artists hail can help give one perspective on their own beginnings, and perhaps their eventual destination as well.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.