confused about texture

10:11 AM, Friday May 24th 2024

Hi everyone

I‘m trying to tackle the texture challenge and i feel a bit lost when I look at an image and i try to know which information on the image I should transform into a mark

Here is what I understand:

-there are two types of shadow: form shadow (the part of the form which is away from a light source) and cast shadow (cast on another form/surface)

-in drawabox, only draw form shadow if it contains texture information (no hatching), but drawing cast shadow is fine

-in drawabox, we don‘t draw textures on the whole form (like all the fur on a cat). We only draw it if its part of the shading of a form or if it impacts its silouhette.

-When drawing texture, we use both shadows (form shadow and cast shadow)

So if I understand it right, when doing the texture challenge, in the first square I only draw form shadows so that I understand the actual shape of the texture. Then, in the larger rectangle, I invent the cast shadows to make the gradations?

Is that correct?

Also, is reflection (like on metal or water) part of "texture"?

Finally, if you have any further reading recommandation to follow up on this subject in the way it is taught here I'm game

Thanks

Happy drawing to everyone!

0 users agree
7:21 PM, Saturday May 25th 2024

So there are a couple corrections I should note to what you've mentioned. Most notably, form shading isn't something we worry about in this course. In this section I do talk about how texture itself can serve as a way to convey form shading, but as noted in the title of the section, form shading isn't something we want students concerning themselves with for our purposes here. When drawing your textures, try to focus on cast shadows only.

The texture section is easily the one that is most needing an update, although our slow-and-steady overhaul process has only just reached Lesson 2 (most of our resources are committed to providing official critique and managing the community as a whole, so it is very slow), and a lot of the confusion arises from the fact that the demonstrations are very old - especially for the dissections. I believe that video is from 2017, which was before we realized that it was much more effective to have students focus on implicit markmaking and cast shadows.

Prior to that point, when it came to textures I was still trying to largely regurgitate what I was taught in my Dynamic Sketching class with Peter Han, which still involved a lot more "feeling things out" rather than explicit rules - so while when tackling this in the overhaul I probably will move away from reflections (which are not the same as texture), they're there currently because "texture" at the time was less about implicit markmaking, and more just about decoration.

We have updated the text portion of the material, as well as the texture analysis stuff to better focus on implicit markmaking, but the dissection stuff being more outdated has definitely led to uncertainty amongst students. The way we'll be moving forward though will tie in better to the overall focus of the course, bringing it all back around to developing those core 3D spatial reasoning skills. A cast shadow is itself something that helps to define the relationship between different structures as they exist in space - the design of the shadow shape itself establishes how the form casting the shadow relates to the surface receiving it. That's why, despite being superficially very different from all the construction we do here, it actually falls right in line with everything else we study in this course.

Despite the understandable confusion, it's best not to worry about it too much. While mostly we haven't updated it yet because we wanted to work through the course in order from start to finish, the fact that these issues/confusion are a lot less of a problem for those students who just push through and do their best has also reduced it as a priority. Even once the material's updated, the expectation won't be that you'll "get it" where it's introduced. It'll continue to be one of the parts of the course that throws you into the "deep end of the pool", to plant a seed in your mind as to how you can start thinking about these concepts, so that as we continue to work through the remainder of the course, exploring those 3D spatial skills in different ways, that it will all come together into a well-rounded understanding of 3D space.

10:10 AM, Monday May 27th 2024

Hi Uncomfortable,

Thanks for your reply and corrections. I'll have a reread of the texture section in the light of what you say here.

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something we've used ourselves, or know to be of impeccable quality. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Let's be real here for a second: fineliners can get pricey. It varies from brand to brand, store to store, and country to country, but good fineliners like the Staedtler Pigment Liner (my personal brand favourite) can cost an arm and a leg. I remember finding them being sold individually at a Michael's for $4-$5 each. That's highway robbery right there.

Now, we're not a big company ourselves or anything, but we have been in a position to periodically import large batches of pens that we've sourced ourselves - using the wholesale route to keep costs down, and then to split the savings between getting pens to you for cheaper, and setting some aside to one day produce our own.

These pens are each hand-tested (on a little card we include in the package) to avoid sending out any duds (another problem with pens sold in stores). We also checked out a handful of different options before settling on this supplier - mainly looking for pens that were as close to the Staedtler Pigment Liner. If I'm being honest, I think these might even perform a little better, at least for our use case in this course.

We've also tested their longevity. We've found that if we're reasonably gentle with them, we can get through all of Lesson 1, and halfway through the box challenge. We actually had ScyllaStew test them while recording realtime videos of her working through the lesson work, which you can check out here, along with a variety of reviews of other brands.

Now, I will say this - we're only really in a position to make this an attractive offer for those in the continental United States (where we can offer shipping for free). We do ship internationally, but between the shipping prices and shipping times, it's probably not the best offer you can find - though this may depend. We also straight up can't ship to the UK, thanks to some fairly new restrictions they've put into place relating to their Brexit transition. I know that's a bummer - I'm Canadian myself - but hopefully one day we can expand things more meaningfully to the rest of the world.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.