i don't mean to be a smart ass but in the white pelican demo you write: "It is entirely necessary however for us to understand what is going on underneath the skin (...) this information will prove to be very valuable in pushing the believability of your drawings in the most unexpected of ways."
is this just due to it being an older demo? if so it might be helpful to clarify that when you're doing the overhaul of the later lessons
Ah yeah, that is very much because it's older. There are a lot of little things that have become contradictions over the years, which is really why I'm fully overhauling everything, and planning to create an entirely new set of demonstrations when I get there.
awesome! i'm looking forward to that
Right from when students hit the 50% rule early on in Lesson 0, they ask the same question - "What am I supposed to draw?"
It's not magic. We're made to think that when someone just whips off interesting things to draw, that they're gifted in a way that we are not. The problem isn't that we don't have ideas - it's that the ideas we have are so vague, they feel like nothing at all. In this course, we're going to look at how we can explore, pursue, and develop those fuzzy notions into something more concrete.
This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.
