Lesson 4: Applying Construction to Insects and Arachnids

5:00 PM, Friday March 1st 2024

Imgur: The magic of the Internet

Imgur: https://imgur.com/a/f5ccCDs

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered enterta...

Thank you for the review!

0 users agree
4:50 PM, Saturday March 2nd 2024
edited at 4:58 PM, Mar 2nd 2024

Hello Howard, I'll be the teaching assistant handling your lesson 4 critique.

Before I get to critiquing your work, I just wanted to quickly note that having your scanner set to process your drawings to only black and white like this is not ideal. When it comes to scanning, the reason it's better to avoid anything that performs additional processing like this on your images is that it can make it a lot harder to determine whether the linework itself was executed poorly, or if it's the software deciding to throw out a lot of extra marks that help give the ones that did show up context. It is better to have the scanner set to a photo, or full colour mode, or if that is not possible then the cameras on most phones will work fine, especially if the photos are taken in indirect sunlight, which really helps to maximise the potential of that hardware.

Anyway, I'm going to be critiquing the work based on what I see - so do keep that in mind in case what you've submitted doesn't accurately represent what the pages look like in real life.

Starting with your organic forms, it looks like you're aiming to stick to the characteristics of simple sausages that are introduced here. They're getting a bit more consistent than your lesson 2 attempts at this exercise, but there are still cases where you've got subtle swelling or pinching through the middle of the forms, or ends that are a little lopsided or flattened. Keep striving to stick to the properties of two equal sized balls connected by a bendy tube of consistent width. Make sure you're giving yourself ample time ghosting each one and executing the line with confidence once your pen touches the page.

Your contour curves are getting smoother and more confident than your previous pages, which is great.

Your curves are mostly sticking to the same degree. Keep in mind that the degree of your contour lines should be shifting wider as we slide along the sausage form, moving farther away from the viewer. This is also influenced by the way in which the sausages themselves turn in space, but farther = wider is a good rule of thumb to follow. If you're unsure as to why that is, review the Lesson 1 ellipses video. You can also see a good example of how to vary your contour curves in this diagram showing the different ways in which our contour lines can change the way in which the sausage is perceived.

Moving on to your insect constructions, looking at your demo drawings you've done a good job following most of the steps closely, and the only real concern I have with the demo pages is that you don't seem to have used the sausage method of leg construction, as introduced here. Now, in all fairness, the sausage method isn't actually used in the older house fly demo, which is a little outdated in this regard. The louse demo looks to be your best attempt at leg construction, as you'd drawn chains of overlapping sausage forms, and just got a little mixed up on where to place the contour lines. We want to place the contour lines at the joints, to clarify how the sausage forms intersect (like the form intersections exercise) rather than along the surface of individual sausage forms (like from the organic forms with contours exercise).

The strategy you seem to have employed for the majority of your legs looks like you'd drawn circles for the joints, then connected them with lines, as noted on this analysis of your bee. It's not uncommon for students to be aware of the sausage method, but to decide that the legs they're looking at don't actually seem to look like a chain of sausages, so they use some other strategy.

The key to keep in mind here is that the sausage method is not about capturing the legs precisely as they are - it is about laying in a base structure or armature that captures both the solidity and the gestural flow of a limb in equal measure, where the majority of other techniques lean too far to one side, either looking solid and stiff or gestural but flat. Once in place, we can then build on top of this base structure with more additional forms as shown in these examples here, here, and in this ant leg demo and also here on this dog leg demo as this method should be used throughout lesson 5 too.

Moving on to an analysis of the constructions done from your own references, things are a little mixed. You've got some pages, such as this fly where you're clearly thinking about those ball forms of the head and abdomen as volumes in 3D space, and others such as this shrimp which feel like a series of 2D shapes stamped onto a flat piece of paper. I'd like you to take some time to compare the approach you used for your shrimp construction with this demo of a similar species from a similar angle. Notice how with the first step Uncomfortable establishes simple solid forms for head, thorax and abdomen, and that he allows these forms to overlap, using contour lines to define where these forms intersect in 3D space. You'd kept your first step nice and simple, which is great, but you'd drawn a series of flat geometric shapes (triangles and rectangles) adjacent to one another, rather than solid organic forms (ellipses to represent balls, or sausage forms) which overlap. As discussed in this section of the lesson intro page we want to perceive our first simple forms as solid and 3D prior to moving forward.

I did also notice a tendency to draw your earlier constructional marks a little more faintly, especially when blocking in ellipses for the head/thorax/abdomen. Be sure to make every mark with the same confidence - drawing earlier parts more faintly can undermine how willing we are to regard them as solid forms that are present in the 3D world, and it can also encourage us to redraw more, and trace more over this existing linework later on, rather than letting them stand for themselves.

The last point I want to talk about relates to differentiating between the actions we can take when interacting with a construction, which fall into two groups:

  • Actions in 2D space, where we're just putting lines down on a page, without necessarily considering the specific nature of the relationships between the forms they're meant to represent and the forms that already exist in the scene.

  • Actions in 3D space, where we're actually thinking about how each form we draw exists in 3D space, and how it relates to the existing 3D structures already present. We draw them in a manner that actually respects the 3D nature of what's already there, and even reinforces it.

Because we're drawing on a flat piece of paper, we have a lot of freedom to make whatever marks we choose, but many of those marks would contradict the illusion you're trying to create and remind the viewer that they're just looking at a series of lines on a flat piece of paper. In order to avoid this and stick only to the marks that reinforce the illusion we're creating, we can force ourselves to adhere to certain rules as we build up our constructions. Rules that respect the solidity of our construction.

For example - once you've put a form down on the page, do not attempt to alter its silhouette. Its silhouette is just a shape on the page which represents the form we're drawing, but its connection to that form is entirely based on its current shape. If you change that shape, you won't alter the form it represents - you'll just break the connection, leaving yourself with a flat shape. We can see this most easily in this example of what happens when we cut back into the silhouette of a form.

For example, I've marked on your bee in red where it looks like you cut back inside the silhouette of forms you had already drawn. One thing I did notice is that many of the instances of cutting into forms (though not all) came down to the fact that your ellipses would come out a little loose (which is totally normal), and then you'd pick one of the inner edges to serve as the silhouette of the ball form you were constructing. This unfortunately would leave some stray marks outside of its silhouette, which does create some visual issues. Generally it is best to treat the outermost perimeter of the ellipse as the edge of the silhouette, so everything else remains contained within it. This diagram shows which lines to use on a loose ellipse.

On the same image I marked in blue where you'd extended off existing forms using partial, flat shapes, or one-off lines, not quite providing enough information for us to understand how they actually connect to the existing structure in 3D space.

Instead, when we want to build on our construction or alter something we add new 3D forms to the existing structure. Forms with their own complete silhouettes - and by establishing how those forms either connect or relate to what's already present in our 3D scene. We can do this either by defining the intersection between them with contour lines (like in lesson 2's form intersections exercise), or by wrapping the silhouette of the new form around the existing structure as shown here.

This is all part of understanding that everything we draw is 3D, and therefore needs to be treated as such in order for both you and the viewer to believe in that lie.

You can see this in practice in this beetle horn demo, as well as in this ant head demo. You can also see some good examples of this in the lobster and shrimp demos on the informal demos page. As Uncomfortable has been pushing this concept more recently, it hasn't been fully integrated into the lesson material yet (it will be when the overhaul reaches Lesson 4). Until then, those submitting for official critiques basically get a preview of what is to come.

Conclusion

I want to make it clear that there is a lot that you're doing really well. It looks like you're using the ghosting method and making every effort to stick to the principles of markmaking introduced in lesson 1. It also looks like you've done your best to follow the demos and apply those methods to your own constructions. I'm a little concerned that for some of your original constructions you may not believe your own lie quite yet. This is an ongoing process, and I think spending a little more time doing a couple of extra pages here will make the next lesson much more manageable for you. Please read through the feedback above carefully and apply the points discussed here to the following:

  • Draw along with the shrimp demo, following each step as closely as you can.

  • 2 pages of insect constructions using references of your choice.

Next Steps:

  • One drawing done following the shrimp demo.

  • Two more pages of insect constructions.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
edited at 4:58 PM, Mar 2nd 2024
4:57 PM, Tuesday March 5th 2024

Thank you very much for your thoughts. Attached are the three pages you asked for. I think I got the right settings on my printer but then Imgur wouldn't allow an upload. Here's the google link - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Lg3A-02d_50FizgUNd_D3UITU3_tVF6-?usp=sharing

Enjoy!

9:05 PM, Tuesday March 5th 2024
edited at 9:08 PM, Mar 5th 2024

Hello Howard, thank you for replying with your revisions.

I think the reason Imgur wouldn't accept the files is because they're in .TIF format, try saving as a .JPEG or .PNG next time.

Starting with the drawing done along with the shrimp demo, the intent with this assignment was for you to follow each step as shown, as closely as possible, so that you could learn the techniques Uncomfortable uses here and then apply them to your own constructions. It appears that though you did look at the shrimp demo, but you were largely doing your own thing with this construction, instead of following the demo directly. It looks like you were either using a different reference, or working from memory or imagination for substantial periods.

This is unfortunate, as there are mistakes in your shrimp which contravene the final point from my initial critique, by altering the silhouette of forms you have already drawn, undermining the 3D illusion we seek to create with these constructions. I've marked these on your work here using red where you cut back inside the silhouette forms you had already drawn, and blue where you had extended them with one-off lines or partial shapes.

Moving on to the constructions done from your own references, you're extending these with flat partial shapes as well. I've marked an example on this bee and included a diagram showing how to build this addition with a complete new form that attaches to the existing ball form in 3D space instead. I'd like you to reread the section on differentiating between the actions we can take when interacting with a construction from my initial critique, and study the various diagrams and demos I shared with you to help you to apply this to your constructions.

The last point to cover is that although I think you're trying to use the sausage method of leg construction, quite a lot of your leg forms are coming out as ellipses or stretched spheres, which as stated on the lower left of the sausage method diagram should be avoided, as they tend to be too stiff. So, as noted on your bee only draw around your sausage forms once, as going around them multiple times leans into the arm's natural tendency to make elliptical motions, often causing the forms to become elliptical. Remember to include the contour curve at each joint, to show how the forms intersect in 3D space.

I can see that you've had a go at building additional forms onto the hind leg of your bee, nice work. While it seems obvious to take a bigger form and use it to envelop a section of the existing structure, it actually works better to break it into smaller pieces that can each have their own individual relationship with the underlying sausages defined, as shown here. The key is not to engulf an entire form all the way around - always provide somewhere that the form's silhouette is making contact with the structure, so you can define how that contact is made.

Unfortunately there's quite a bit of information from my initial critique which has not been applied here, so I will be asking you to complete another round of revisions. If anything said to you here, or in my initial critique, is unclear or confusing you are allowed to ask for clarification.

Please complete the following:

  • 1 drawing of the shrimp demo following each step as closely as you can.

  • 2 pages of insect constructions from references of your choice.

Next Steps:

  • 1 drawing of the shrimp demo following each step as closely as you can.

  • 2 pages of insect constructions from references of your choice.

When finished, reply to this critique with your revisions.
edited at 9:08 PM, Mar 5th 2024
9:28 PM, Tuesday March 5th 2024

Yes, I did misunderstand your shrimp instructions and used another model. I'll do it the correct way now. And practice more on the others. Thanks!

The recommendation below is an advertisement. Most of the links here are part of Amazon's affiliate program (unless otherwise stated), which helps support this website. It's also more than that - it's a hand-picked recommendation of something I've used myself. If you're interested, here is a full list.
Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Drawabox-Tested Fineliners (Pack of 10, $17.50 USD)

Let's be real here for a second: fineliners can get pricey. It varies from brand to brand, store to store, and country to country, but good fineliners like the Staedtler Pigment Liner (my personal brand favourite) can cost an arm and a leg. I remember finding them being sold individually at a Michael's for $4-$5 each. That's highway robbery right there.

Now, we're not a big company ourselves or anything, but we have been in a position to periodically import large batches of pens that we've sourced ourselves - using the wholesale route to keep costs down, and then to split the savings between getting pens to you for cheaper, and setting some aside to one day produce our own.

These pens are each hand-tested (on a little card we include in the package) to avoid sending out any duds (another problem with pens sold in stores). We also checked out a handful of different options before settling on this supplier - mainly looking for pens that were as close to the Staedtler Pigment Liner. If I'm being honest, I think these might even perform a little better, at least for our use case in this course.

We've also tested their longevity. We've found that if we're reasonably gentle with them, we can get through all of Lesson 1, and halfway through the box challenge. We actually had ScyllaStew test them while recording realtime videos of her working through the lesson work, which you can check out here, along with a variety of reviews of other brands.

Now, I will say this - we're only really in a position to make this an attractive offer for those in the continental United States (where we can offer shipping for free). We do ship internationally, but between the shipping prices and shipping times, it's probably not the best offer you can find - though this may depend. We also straight up can't ship to the UK, thanks to some fairly new restrictions they've put into place relating to their Brexit transition. I know that's a bummer - I'm Canadian myself - but hopefully one day we can expand things more meaningfully to the rest of the world.

This website uses cookies. You can read more about what we do with them, read our privacy policy.